Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ˗ˏˋ argenthill ⁺◦ daily !! ´ˎ˗🦞

Channel

˗ˏˋ argenthill ⁺◦ daily !! ´ˎ˗🦞

@argentixboothilldaily

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,787subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002243892943
TypeChannel
Username@argentixboothilldaily
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/argentixboothilldaily

Growth

1,7871,7961,791.58 August 2026 — 1,796 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,796 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,795 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,794 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,787 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,786–1,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:051,787-7
12 Aug 2026, 13:441,794-1
9 Aug 2026, 05:211,795-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:201,796no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:191,796first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

950 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 544505196182296050465268.6%
custom 544990853045265545116517.4%
custom 544962504543125421813314.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 950reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 08:51 UTC413 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 544505196182296050432

3 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC418 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мешок кала

custom 544505196182296050438

10 Apr 2026, 16:55 UTC≈1,250 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 544505196182296050445

10 Apr 2026, 16:54 UTC≈1,200 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Йоу подписчики как дела даешь молодежь рассказывайте

custom 544505196182296050438

10 Apr 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,180 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 544505196182296050477

10 Apr 2026, 16:33 UTC≈1,100 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗹 ༝ 𝒹𝒶𝒾𝓁𝓎 ᡣ𐭩 ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⃝𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓 ⠀𝑐𝑟 ﹕﹫ 𝑖𝑛 𝑋 ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⤷ #art - #argenti - #boothill - #argenthill

custom 544505196182296050424

20 Feb 2026, 22:10 UTC≈1,830 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мешок кала

custom 544505196182296050458custom 54496250454312542187

3 Feb 2026, 13:42 UTC≈2,230 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мешок кала

custom 544990853045265545149custom 544962504543125421817

3 Feb 2026, 13:24 UTC≈2,190 views105 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wbtix228Photo

пока я рисовала это я захотела жить

custom 544505196182296050467custom 544962504543125421821custom 544990853045265545117

24 Jan 2026, 09:21 UTC≈2,220 views86 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мешок кала

custom 544990853045265545151custom 544962504543125421820custom 544505196182296050415

19 Jan 2026, 22:49 UTC≈2,170 views85 reactionsread 8 August 2026

если мне объяснят, заяем колумбине криты, то я возрожу дэйлик и начну делать вп🙏🏼🙏🏼

custom 544505196182296050457custom 544990853045265545115custom 544962504543125421813

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @argentixboothilldaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,162,895 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“˗ˏˋ argenthill ⁺◦ daily !! ´ˎ˗🦞” (@argentixboothilldaily), 1,787 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/argentixboothilldaily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.