Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Arax AI

Channel

Arax AI

@araxai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,218subscribers

-146 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003994867094
TypeChannel
Username@araxai
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 28 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/araxai

Growth

5,2185,3645,2916 August 2026 — 5,364 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,340 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,310 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,258 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,218 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,196–5,386 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:465,218-40
13 Aug 2026, 04:595,258-52
10 Aug 2026, 01:245,310-30
7 Aug 2026, 10:015,340-24
6 Aug 2026, 14:215,364first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 5,218 subscribers
Avg views / post
559
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held30 (28 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total16,775
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1263.2%
🔥421.1%
👍15.26%
👎15.26%
💩15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC807 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📌 قبل از انتخاب ابزار AI، اول مسئله‌تان را مشخص کنید. معمولاً سؤال این است: 🔹 برای کار من، ChatGPT یا Gemini مناسب‌تر است؟ 🔹 چه زمانی Claude یا Cursor ارزش استفاده دارند؟ اما سؤال مهم‌تر: می‌خواهید AI دقیقاً کدام بخش از کارتان را بهتر کند؟ نیاز یک برنامه‌نویس، پژوهشگر یا تولیدکننده محتوا یکسان نیست. ممکن است هدفتان این باشد: 🔹 تحلیل مقاله و فایل 🔹 تحقیق و حل مسئله 🔹 تولید محتوا و ایده‌پردازی 🔹 توسعه و دیباگ پروژه 🔹

11 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC42 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚨 چرا هوش مصنوعی جواب‌های سطحی می‌دهد؟ مشکل همیشه از مدل نیست؛ گاهی درخواست ما ناقص است. وقتی می‌نویسیم «یک کمپین فروش طراحی کن»، مدل نمی‌داند: • مخاطب کیست؟ • هدف و محدودیت‌ها چیست؟ • خروجی با چه معیاری سنجیده می‌شود؟ نتیجه؟ پیشنهادهای عمومی مثل تخفیف و قرعه‌کشی. نکته مهم: عبارت «قدم‌به‌قدم فکر کن» معجزه نمی‌کند. پاسخ مرحله‌ای هم ممکن است اشتباه باشد؛ نتیجه را با داده‌ی واقعی بررسی کن. ✅ فرمول درخواست حرفه‌ای • زمی

2

10 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC577 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 جشنواره آراکس: ترکیب «پایداری» و «هوشمندی» ابزارهای حرفه‌ای، زیرساخت حرفه‌ای می‌خواهند! قطعی اینترنت وسط ترید یا کدنویسی یعنی فاجعه. 🎁 آفر شفاف و بی‌تکرار: با خرید ۱۰۰ گیگ VPN اختصاصی (تنها ۶۰۰ هزار تومان)، یک ماه اکانت اختصاصی و ضمانت‌دار Gemini 3.1 Pro را هدیه بگیرید! چرا این پیشنهاد؟ بهترین دستیار هوشمند هم با اینترنت پرنوسان بی‌فایده است. شما فقط هزینه یک زیرساخت امن (VPN آی‌پی ثابت) را می‌پردازید، اما

9 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC678 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚨 به هوش مصنوعی نگو «جواب بده»؛ بگو «میزگرد» تشکیل بده! مدل‌های رایگان در تصمیمات مهم، سطحی‌ترین جواب رو می‌دن؛ چون برای عدم‌ریسک برنامه‌ریزی شدن. اما یک تصمیمِ درست، نیازمند چالش است. 🎯 تکنیک اتاق فکر چندوجهی به‌جای یک جواب ساده، هوش مصنوعی رو وادار کن مناظره‌ای چالشی بین متخصصان مجازی تشکیل بده. ⚡️ 🧪 پرامپت آماده (برای کپی‌کردن): برای بررسی: [مسئله‌ات را بنویس] میزگردی با ۳ شخصیت شبیه‌سازی کن: ۱. استراتژیست خلا

1

8 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🎨 عکست رو فقط «فیلتر» نکن؛ تبدیلش کن به یک تابلوی واقعی. خیلی از پرامپت‌های تبدیل عکس به نقاشی، فقط کمی بافت روی تصویر می‌اندازن و خروجی هنوز کاملاً دیجیتالی به نظر می‌رسه. این پرامپت طوری نوشته شده که چهره، ژست و لباس عکس اصلی حفظ بشه، اما نور، بافت، رنگ و جزئیات تصویر به یک پرتره رنگ‌روغن واقع‌گرایانه با حس نقاشی دست‌ساز تبدیل بشه. 🖼 🔵 نتیجه‌ای که باید بگیری: ▪️ حفظ چهره و هویت عکس اصلی ▪️ ضربه‌قلم‌های قابل‌مشاهد

1

8 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC61 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❤️ بعضی رضایت‌ها بیشتر از هر تبلیغی حرف می‌زنن. این‌ها فقط چند پیام نیست؛ پشت هر کدوم یک تجربه واقعی از خرید، راه‌اندازی و پشتیبانی آراکس قرار داره. وقتی مشتری میگه: «دم تو هم گرم که مورد اعتمادی» ❤️ برای ما یعنی چیزی مهم‌تر از تحویل سرویس اتفاق افتاده: اعتماد شکل گرفته. در آراکس تلاش می‌کنیم از اولین پیام تا تحویل و پشتیبانی، مشتری بدونه یک مجموعه پاسخگو کنارش هست. ممنون از اعتماد و همراهی‌تون. ❤️ 🆔 @araxai 👨‍💻 @

3

8 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC65 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

بین این 3 محصول کدوم یکی بیشتر به کارتون میاد؟

  1. Gemini Pro50%
  2. Ghatgpt Plus25%
  3. Claude35%
  4. Vpn اختصاصی آراکس20%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥21

8 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC759 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 یه VPN خوب، وسط کارت رهات نمی‌کنه. وقتی با ChatGPT یا Gemini کار می‌کنی، ترید می‌کنی، تماس داری یا ویدیو می‌بینی، قطع‌ووصلی فقط اعصاب‌خردی نیست؛ می‌تونه کل کارت رو مختل کنه. ⚡️ وی‌پی‌ان اختصاصی آراکس ▪️ اتصال پایدار و سرعت مناسب ▪️ آی‌پی ثابت با لوکیشن اروپایی ▪️ کانفیگ اختصاصی V2Ray ▪️ مناسب موبایل، لپ‌تاپ، ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی و ترید ▪️ پشتیبانی بعد از خرید 🧪 قبل از خرید، روی اینترنت خودت تستش کن. اگر سرعت و پا

2💩1

7 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC≈2,660 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 جشنواره ویژه فروش Gemini Pro آراکس برای تحقیق، تحلیل فایل‌های طولانی، کار با متن و تصویر و پروژه‌های جدی، Gemini Pro یک ابزار قدرتمنده. 🔵 با Gemini Pro می‌تونی: ▪️ فایل‌ها و منابع مختلف رو تحلیل و جمع‌بندی کنی ▪️ روی متن و تصویر هم‌زمان کار کنی ▪️ تصویر و ویدیو تولید کنی ▪️ برای کدنویسی و حل مسائل پیچیده کمک بگیری ▪️ پروژه‌های طولانی رو منسجم‌تر پیش ببری فقط جواب نگیر؛ تحقیق کن، تحلیل کن، بساز و پروژه جلو ببر. ━

👎1

7 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC223 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❤️ بعضی رضایت‌ها بیشتر از هر تبلیغی حرف می‌زنن. وقتی مشتری بعد از تجربه‌ی خرید قبلی، دوباره برای تهیه اکانت جدید سراغ آراکس میاد، یعنی اعتماد فقط در حد یک خرید باقی نمونده. و این جمله برای ما از خود سفارش ارزشمندتره: «هم از پاسخگویی‌تون و همراهیتون، هم از قیمت و ارسال به‌موقع راضی بودم.» 🌹 ما در آراکس تلاش می‌کنیم تجربه خرید فقط به تحویل یک اکانت خلاصه نشه؛ از اولین پیام و مشاوره، تا قیمت‌گذاری شفاف، تحویل به‌موقع

6 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC682 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 پکیج کامل هوش مصنوعی آراکس یک ماه ChatGPT + سه ماه Gemini Pro اختصاصی + ۱۰ گیگ اینترنت هدیه 🔥 همه فقط ۱٬۱۹۰٬۰۰۰ تومان دیگه لازم نیست اکانت و اینترنت مناسبش رو جدا تهیه کنی؛ همه‌چیز از روز اول آماده‌ست. 🤖 هوش مصنوعیChatGPT یک‌ماهه ▪️ تولید و بازنویسی محتوا ▪️ ایده‌پردازی و برنامه‌ریزی ▪️ کدنویسی، رفع اشکال و تحلیل 🔵 هوش مصنوعی Gemini Pro اختصاصی سه‌ماهه ▪️ بررسی فایل‌ها و اسناد طولانی ▪️ تحقیق و جمع‌بندی منابع ▪

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @araxai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTCAnonymous Poll20 voters

بین این 3 محصول کدوم یکی بیشتر به کارتون میاد؟

  1. Gemini Pro50%
  2. Ghatgpt Plus25%
  3. Claude35%
  4. Vpn اختصاصی آراکس20%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

اکانت claude موجود کنیم؟

  1. بله😍😍😍😍😍41%
  2. حتما❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️47%
  3. چرا که نه؟💚💚💚💚💚47%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 768,331 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Arax AI” (@araxai), 5,218 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/araxai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.