Ну так можно или нельзя чистить детали двигателя в аквабласте iBlast 😡🤚 #аквабластинг #iblast
🔥3👏1

Channel
@aqua_blasting_163
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
1,407subscribers
+40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001757412826 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aqua_blasting_163 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aqua_blasting_163 |
Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:19 | 1,407 | +2 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 1,405 | -3 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 1,408 | +8 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 1,400 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 1,402 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 1,401 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:35 | 1,402 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 1,400 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 1,399 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 1,398 | +32 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 1,366 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 1,365 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 1,364 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 1,366 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 1,367 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 1,367 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
85 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 47 | 55.3% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 41.2% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну так можно или нельзя чистить детали двигателя в аквабласте iBlast 😡🤚 #аквабластинг #iblast
🔥3👏1
Вибро галтовка тоже не простая штука
👍2🔥2
Газуем на iBlast ДЖЕТ 1000, которая поедет к специалистам по ремонту ГОЛОВОК БЛОКА-да да да! и парни берут уже вторую камеру у нас, и работают они стеклошариком 🙂🤚 #iblast #гидроабразив #аквабластинг
👍3
iBlast Джет 1200 полипропилен в Минск для Артёма #iblast #гидроабразив
👍8🔥1
Электро галтовку рекомендую 💯 за эту работу взял 3000 руб. Правда работал дробью, и потом стеклошариком #гидроабразив #iblast
👍6❤1🔥1
Меня часто спрашивают: что вообще можно чистить в аквабластинге iBlast и на чем тут можно заработать? Ответ простой: зарабатывать можно практически на всем, если не бояться работы руками. В аквабластинге всегда много слесарки: разобрать, промыть, где-то поработать химией, собрать назад. Как пример — работа на видео: вы, наверное, заметили, что мы не стали обрабатывать в iBlast тросы и хромированные элементы крепления…
👍11
Оптимизация 💪
🔥6
iBlast ДЖЕТ 1200 #аквабластинг
🔥7
🔥 Джет 1200 💪 в нержавеющем корпусе за 350 000 руб 🔥
🔥Джет 1000💪 в нержавеющем корпусе за 300 000 руб 🔥
Наш канал в мах https://max.ru/join/Fdsm0469caxrw6YRkYORSB6hE3yZ8jUE1FLtvxjTBTc
Удаляем ЛКП с пластиковых деталей в камере гидроабразивной очистки iBlast ДЖЕТ 1200. Аквабластинг мягко выбивает краску водой с абразивом и не перегревает пластик, поэтому геометрия и фактура детали остаются целыми. Можно снять ЛКП шлифмашинкой – но в труднодоступные места не подлезть, плюс есть риск «зализать» кромки и перегреть пластик. Можно химсмывкой – но легко получить потёки, вздутия и даже разрушение самого п…
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @aqua_blasting_163. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аквабластинг оборудование iBlast” (@aqua_blasting_163), 1,407 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aqua_blasting_163.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.