Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Апросиии

Channel

Апросиии

@apros_i

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

31,516subscribers

-604 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001508381967
TypeChannel
Username@apros_i
Created14 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/apros_i

Growth

31,51632,12031,8187 August 2026 — 32,120 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,120 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,108 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,084 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,058 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,037 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,024 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,987 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,957 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,916 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,871 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,832 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,792 subscribers19 August 2026 — 31,773 subscribers20 August 2026 — 31,749 subscribers21 August 2026 — 31,731 subscribers22 August 2026 — 31,697 subscribers24 August 2026 — 31,659 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,622 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31,582 subscribers27 August 2026 — 31,549 subscribers28 August 2026 — 31,516 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 21 days, net -604. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,425–32,211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 04:1331,516-33
27 Aug 2026, 06:4331,549-33
26 Aug 2026, 07:5331,582-40
25 Aug 2026, 08:4331,622-37
24 Aug 2026, 05:4231,659-38
22 Aug 2026, 14:4631,697-34
21 Aug 2026, 06:3331,731-18
20 Aug 2026, 07:4331,749-24
19 Aug 2026, 10:5831,773-19
18 Aug 2026, 12:1231,792-40
17 Aug 2026, 12:1531,832-39
16 Aug 2026, 04:1731,871-45
14 Aug 2026, 17:1831,916-41
13 Aug 2026, 09:1331,957-30
12 Aug 2026, 09:2731,987-37
11 Aug 2026, 09:5232,024-13
10 Aug 2026, 11:3532,037-21
9 Aug 2026, 13:2232,058-26
8 Aug 2026, 13:1432,084-24
7 Aug 2026, 14:3032,108first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.45%
avg views ÷ 31,516 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 95 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held95 (2 August 202627 August 2026)
Views total103,353
Reactions total1,997
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,997 reactions across 95 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊78939.5%
54027.0%
22011.0%
😨974.86%
🤯623.10%
😘522.60%
👏422.10%
😇422.10%
😢261.30%
❤‍🔥231.15%
😭160.801%
🔥120.601%
🤬120.601%
🍌100.501%
🎄90.451%
🌚50.25%
👍50.25%
🤔50.25%
🫡40.2%
💯30.15%
15 further kinds231.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,997reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 95 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @apros_i. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 95 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC171 views7 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

Обычная ситуация когда нашел мем?

  1. Заржал на туалете18%
  2. Нашел старый легендарный мем51%
  3. Случайно поделился видео с калькулятором31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥61

27 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC384 views14 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

Жиза когда заходишь в игру?

  1. Видишь дом друга21%
  2. Захожу на старый аккаунт49%
  3. Решил залутать опасный данж30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥111🕊1🤯1

27 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC507 views18 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

Что в детстве вы представляли по-другому?

  1. Одну тонну30%
  2. Любовницу26%
  3. Слово «в смысле»45%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🕊142😨2

26 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC625 views12 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

Кого ещё не отправляли в Дагестан?

  1. Ёжик21%
  2. Мишка Гуми бер54%
  3. Волк26%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11😨1

26 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC713 views15 reactions1 Starread 27 August 2026
Poll

Что нереально бесит?

  1. Заставляют регестрироваться57%
  2. Англичанка14%
  3. Забыл как зовут препода29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤬103🕊1🤯1

26 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC717 views20 reactions1 Starread 27 August 2026
Poll

Что нас ждет совсем скоро?

  1. Посиделки в туалете23%
  2. Усталость от учебы58%
  3. Потеря волос19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🕊13😭52

26 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC713 views19 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

Жизненная ситуация когда дома отключили свет?

  1. Резко врубили ночью36%
  2. Повсюду что-то мерещится26%
  3. С батей проверяем щиток38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

152🕊1😇1

25 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC804 views20 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

Самая захватывающая гонка?

  1. Капелек на стекле36%
  2. Подводных лодок8%
  3. Кто последний тот лох56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

163🕊1

25 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC836 views19 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

Жиза с младшим?

  1. Нужно за 5 минут собрать его23%
  2. Ему купили первый телефон46%
  3. Постоянно будит меня31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14🕊2🤯21

25 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC822 views19 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

Что вы смотрели когда были мелкими?

  1. Май Литтл пони35%
  2. Прохождение Фнаф43%
  3. Страшные фильмы23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

152🕊1😨1

25 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC847 views18 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

Жизненная ситуация когда помог бабушке?

  1. Отнес банки в погреб13%
  2. Перезагрузил телефон и он заработал48%
  3. Донес пакеты за награду39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🕊1231🔥1😇1

24 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC935 views26 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

Обычная ночь?

  1. Иду в туалет26%
  2. Думаю лечь спать раньше48%
  3. Постоянно что то мерещится26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16🕊32🤯2😨2😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @apros_i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 95 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTCAnonymous Poll106 voters

Обычная ситуация когда нашел мем?

  1. Заржал на туалете18%
  2. Нашел старый легендарный мем51%
  3. Случайно поделился видео с калькулятором31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTCAnonymous Poll218 voters

Жиза когда заходишь в игру?

  1. Видишь дом друга21%
  2. Захожу на старый аккаунт49%
  3. Решил залутать опасный данж30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTCAnonymous Poll278 voters

Что в детстве вы представляли по-другому?

  1. Одну тонну30%
  2. Любовницу26%
  3. Слово «в смысле»45%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTCAnonymous Poll340 voters

Кого ещё не отправляли в Дагестан?

  1. Ёжик21%
  2. Мишка Гуми бер54%
  3. Волк26%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTCAnonymous Poll357 voters

Что нереально бесит?

  1. Заставляют регестрироваться57%
  2. Англичанка14%
  3. Забыл как зовут препода29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTCAnonymous Poll316 voters

Что нас ждет совсем скоро?

  1. Посиделки в туалете23%
  2. Усталость от учебы58%
  3. Потеря волос19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,220,148 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Апросиии” (@apros_i), 31,516 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apros_i.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.