Channel
@apexcup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,094subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001468694633 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @apexcup |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/apexcup |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 4,094 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 4,098 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 4,103 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 4,113 | -12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 4,125 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 4,128 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 21 | 33.9% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 27.4% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 22.6% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.84% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 20 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😊А вот теперь начали •Разработчики запустили тест с ограничением рангов в одном отряде •Помимо ограничения рангов в команде, они запретили начинать матчи в заранее собранных командах для даймондов, мастеров и предаторов
👍4
😐А нет не начали •Разработчики перенесли изменения, связанные с ограничениями заранее собранных команд на неопределенный срок
😢Respawn начали тестировать большее ограничение в разнице рангов между игроками в заранее собранных командах • Например серебро не сможет теперь играть с платиной, только с золотом
👍5
🔥Награды за рейтинг 29 сезона
🔥2
😱iiTzTimmy поднялся с новичка до предатора за 33 часа •Предыдущий рекорд - 55 часов •На это потребовалось 142 матча, 28 из которых это топ 1
🔥11
☝️Respawn про смысл Аксель: •Аксель была создана для расширения вариантов мувмента после доминации Валькирии на ALGS •Ранняя версия ульты превращала Аксель в подобие Трезубца и она могла перевозить союзников •Было решено поменять ульту на взрывного дрона, чтобы сделать её более универсальной •Тактическое умение для командной ротации, мувмент остается ядром легенды
😢После последнего патча Апекс на пс5 стал чаще вылетать посреди игры
😁3
👎Слишком быстрые •Respawn говорят, что Аксель, Фьюз и Кондуит слишком быстрые, что выделяется на фоне других легенд •Скорее всего им почикают мувмент😉(ну Аксель уж точно)
👍4
😭У хаоса забрали турбозарядник в последнем обновлении •Мод не выдается при нанесении нужного количества урона
😢14👍4
👀Новые "пассивки" в Джокере которые выйдут 2 июня: • Маскировка в приседе • Эксперт карабканья по стенам • Бесконечные патроны • Бесконечные гранаты • Самоуничтожение • Адреналин при нокауте • Третий слот для оружия • Быстрое скольжение • Бег по стенам • Ускорение • Сыворотка перышка(Скорее всего нулевая гравитация) • Сыворотка уменьшения • Двойное лечение от малых хилок • Случайная пушка для третьего слота в инвент…
🔥2
😜Апекс теперь соло игра? •Появился баг из-за которого в матче 57 ботов. То есть все, кроме вашего отряда •Баг встречается при подборе быстрых матчей втроем •Вообще непонятно зачем добавлять ботов, если онлайн растёт. Но так же непонятно где этот весь онлайн, когда я по 2-3 минуты сижу в лобби и ищу матч🤔 •До этого была информация, что разработчики хотят на постоянной основе кидать по 1-2 отряда ботов в не рейтинг…
🥰2
✅Исправлено: - Улучшен экран загрузки, чтобы виднее указать, что игра все еще загружается - Уменьшен эффект наложения цвета от пассивного навыка Кондуит
🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @apexcup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,076,304 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ApexCup News” (@apexcup), 4,094 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apexcup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.