Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أنشِد ورتِّل مع بلال

Channel

أنشِد ورتِّل مع بلال

@anshid_ma_bilal

Has discussion group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,199subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001956859677
TypeChannel
Username@anshid_ma_bilal
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anshid_ma_bilal

Growth

7,1997,2497,2246 August 2026 — 7,249 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,248 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,242 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,234 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,229 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,219 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,212 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,207 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,207 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,205 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,199 subscribers6 August 202631 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 25 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,192–7,257 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 16:247,199-6
28 Aug 2026, 18:257,205-2
26 Aug 2026, 21:557,207no change
26 Aug 2026, 00:237,207-5
23 Aug 2026, 05:167,212-7
19 Aug 2026, 16:257,219-10
16 Aug 2026, 14:457,229-5
13 Aug 2026, 01:147,234-8
9 Aug 2026, 21:117,242-6
7 Aug 2026, 01:377,248-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:477,249first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 702,105 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بالوحي نُرَبِّي - سمر إبراهيم
@Belwhynoraby · 62,971
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
💦قناة الطِفل المُسلِم💦
@Muslimchild1 · 37,119
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أنشِد ورتِّل مع بلال” (@anshid_ma_bilal), 7,199 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anshid_ma_bilal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.