Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ملتقى التخدير (القناة العامة)

Channel

ملتقى التخدير (القناة العامة)

@ans2q

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,111subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001786655711
TypeChannel
Username@ans2q
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ans2q

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

1,340 average views per post against 1,105 subscribers — an engagement rate of 121.0%. Across the 7,754 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 5.19% and 21.2%, with a median of 11.0%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (21 July 2026 20 August 2026)
Posts measured8 of 8 published in the window (3 exact, 5 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled10,694
Mature posts only121.0% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers1,105 measured 18 August 2026
Cohortb1000:ara · 7,754 channels · p10 2.51% · p25 5.19% · p50 11.0% · p75 21.2% · p90 38.3%
Position in cohort99.149th percentile · 11.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.268% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 20 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,1051,1111,10818 August 2026 — 1,106 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,105 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,111 subscribers18 August 202621 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,104–1,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 18:561,111+6
18 Aug 2026, 23:351,105-1
18 Aug 2026, 18:151,106first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
114.0%
avg views ÷ 1,111 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.729%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held19 (27 June 202615 August 2026)
Views total8,864
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥119100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC558 viewsread 18 August 2026

تبليغ مهم للطلبة تمت إضافة القرار بشكل نهائي ويرجى من الطلبة الاطلاع على البرنامج الخاص بالطالب ، بالاضافة نتمنى من جميع الطلبة الالتزام بما يصدر من تبليغات، وعدم التواصل مع أفراد عائلتي أو أقاربي لغرض التوسط أو الاستفسار عن أي موضوع يخص القسم. كل تبليغ يتم نشره يكون واضحًا ورسميًا، وأي مستجدات سيتم إبلاغكم بها مباشرة عبر القنوات المعتمدة. ويرجى كذلك من بعض الطلبة مراعاة الذوق والاحترام في أوقات التواصل؛ فقد حصل

Signed مُحمـد العَبـاسي ♛

11 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC883 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026

تم اضافة القرار لطلبة المرحلة الثالثة بشكل كامل للمواد التقويمية . يرجى من الطلبة مراجعة البرنامج

❤‍🔥6

Signed حمزة كمال العساف

11 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC823 viewsread 18 August 2026

طلابنا الأعزاء، للتوضيح بخصوص قرار الإضافة: الإضافة موجودة ومطبقة، لكن آلية تطبيق الـ(10) درجات الخاصة بالمادة الوزارية تكون على درجة الببل بشكل منسب اي قرابة ٥ درجات على الببل شيت ليستوفي شرط النجاح (من 60)، وليس إضافة 10 درجات مباشرة إلى الدرجة النهائية. وبالنسبة للمراحل الثانية والثالثة: هناك طلاب استفادوا من المعالجة الأولى. فمثلاً إذا كان الطالب قد استفاد من 3 درجات في المعالجة السابقة وبقيت عليه درجتان، وبعد

Signed مُحمـد العَبـاسي ♛

6 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC≈1,150 views11 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥11

Signed Khalid Raad Al-Dawoud

29 Jul 2026, 22:31 UTC≈1,670 views10 reactionsread 18 August 2026

*طلاب بخصوص قرار الخمس درجات التعليمات تصدر من الرئاسة للقسم وبعدين القسم يبلغ بيها ما صدر اي تعليمات من الرئاسة للقسم للان

❤‍🔥10

Signed ⚕️حسام عمار-Hussam Ammar

27 Jul 2026, 06:48 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 18 August 2026

طلاب بالنسبة للمواد الداخلة في الدور الثاني، لا تعتمدوا على تبليغ الكورس الأول، ولا على المحاضرات الداخلة أو غير الداخلة، ولا على صيغة الامتحان. المطلوب منكم دراسة المادة كاملة. حسب تبليغ القسم:

Signed 𝑨𝒃𝒅𝒖𝒍𝒎𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒌 𝑲𝒉𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒍

26 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 18 August 2026

تبليغ عاجل ونهائي على جميع طلبة القسم الدخول إلى برنامج SIS (هيبك) والتأكد من صحة المرحلة الدراسية المسجلة لهم للعام الدراسي 2025-2026. إهمال هذا التبليغ قد يؤدي إلى اعتماد البيانات الحالية كما هي عند استكمال إجراءات التدقيق، وأي طالب لا يراجع بياناته خلال المدة المحددة يتحمل المسؤولية الكاملة عن أي خطأ في مرحلته الدراسية، ولن يُعتد بعبارة (لم أكن أعلم) بعد انتهاء مدة المراجعة. سيتم نشر فورم خاص فقط للطلبة الذين ي

22 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,830 views4 reactionsread 18 August 2026

إعلان مهم تمت مطابقة جميع الاعتراضات الخاصة بالمواد الوزارية، وكانت النتائج مطابقة بالكامل، باستثناء حالة واحدة فقط تم تعديلها وفقاً لما ورد من الجهة المختصة. كما نود إعلامكم بأنه تم رفع وإضافة درجات جميع الطلبة الذين لم تكن درجاتهم قد وصلت سابقاً، وأصبحت النتائج محدثة بشكل نهائي. لذا، على الطلبة الذين ما زالت نتائجهم دون حد النجاح، الاستعداد للدور الثاني، مع تمنياتنا لهم بالتوفيق والنجاح.

❤‍🔥4

Signed حمزة كمال العساف

13 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,960 viewsread 18 August 2026

مستشفى طوارئ ام الربيعين متابعة التبليغ على الكروب الخاص بيكم

Signed مُحمـد العَبـاسي ♛

11 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,930 views11 reactionsread 18 August 2026

🚨 إنذار أكاديمي نهائي إلى طلبة التدريب الصيفي كافة تؤكد رئاسة قسم تقنيات التخدير أن التدريب الصيفي جزء أساسي من متطلبات البرنامج الأكاديمي، وأن الالتزام بالدوام والانضباط المهني ليس أمراً اختيارياً، بل واجباً أكاديمياً يخضع للتقييم والمتابعة. ولوحظ خلال الفترة الأخيرة وجود حالات غياب وعدم التزام ومغادرة لمواقع التدريب دون مبرر، وهو سلوك يتنافى مع أخلاقيات المهنة والتعليمات الجامعية، ولن يتم التساهل معه مستقبلاً.

❤‍🔥11

Signed عثمان العبادي

11 Jul 2026, 10:39 UTC≈1,470 views5 reactionsread 18 August 2026

🎓 أكاديمية رواد التخدير مؤسس أكاديمية رواد التخدير 🫁🫀 تخدير وعناية مركزة 🩺 📚 تبسيط التخدير بلغة يفهمها الطالب. 💯 أساعدك تكون تخديري واثق وناجح. 🚑 من أساسيات التخدير إلى المهارات العملية داخل غرفة العمليات. ستجد معنا: ✅ شرح مبسط ومنظم لجميع مواضيع التخدير. ✅ أدوية التخدير وجرعاتها واستخداماتها. ✅ شرح أجهزة التخدير ومراقبة المريض. ✅ حالات سريرية وأسئلة للمراجعة والامتحانات. ✅ نصائح للتدريب الصيفي والعمل داخل صالة العمل

❤‍🔥5

Signed عثمان العبادي

10 Jul 2026, 22:06 UTC≈1,380 views22 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

الغازات الاستنشاقية. تفيدكم بالتدريب https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLxI0TVsn2WNX6JSHu8DpQdnqDtVPmL886&si=f3JZQq-FHuPYS-1H

❤‍🔥22

Signed Elaf Abdulnabi

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ans2q. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الرعاية الأجتماعيه ( الوجبة السابعة )
@madalaty2 · 81,585
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ملتقى التخدير (القناة العامة)” (@ans2q), 1,111 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ans2q.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.