7 measurements spanning 17 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,135–4,158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 15:15
4,138
-5
20 Aug 2026, 21:29
4,143
-4
17 Aug 2026, 15:48
4,147
-3
14 Aug 2026, 13:17
4,150
-3
10 Aug 2026, 19:14
4,153
-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:15
4,155
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:06
4,155
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.36%
avg views ÷ 4,138 subscribers
Avg views / post
97.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
12 (23 June 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
195
Reactions total
19
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
159 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
63
39.6%
🔥
46
28.9%
👍
20
12.6%
🤩
14
8.81%
😢
8
5.03%
❤🔥
6
3.77%
🥰
2
1.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Какими могут быть части вашей личности: члены вашей внутренней семьи. В моей внутренней семье всю жизнь рулит критикующий родитель. Его главный инструмент влияния: запреты, чувство стыда, вины, порицания. Поэтому сейчас я стараюсь мысленно выключать громкость его голоса внутри меня.
Решила делать себе раз в неделю день тишины: без соцсетей и потребления контента. У меня в последнее время ощущение, что каждая моя минута заполнена чужими мыслями, а для собственного мышления пространства крайне мало. Когда непрерывно потребляю информацию, не могу ничего создавать сама.
«У эмоций есть смысл, и мы должны постараться понять, о чем они нам сообщают. Как правило, они пытаются побудить нас к каким-то действиям или, наоборот, к их прекращению.»
Хорошие плохие чувства - Рэндольф Несси
Это большая ошибка - ждать жизни без боли.
Несмотря на то, что каждый понимает, что такой жизни не существует, находится множество людей, упорно стремящихся всегда только избегать болезненных переживаний.
Вопрос никогда не был в том, будет ли боль.
Вопрос всегда был в том, какую боль вы готовы выбрать.
Можно испытывать дискомфорт, осваивая новую профессию.
А можно годами жить с болью нереализованности.
Можно пере…
Психика становится устойчивее не тогда, когда жизнь перестает причинять боль, а тогда, когда человек перестает избегать этой боли.
Избегающее, охранительное поведение защищает наши иррациональные установки и растит внутренние страхи. Именно оно часто ответственно за гнетущее ощущение неудовлетворенности своей жизнью.
Завтра сделаю либо подробный пост, либо подкаст на эту тему.
Про экстравертов-преступников😅
У Ганса Айзенка была интересная гипотеза.
Он считал, что дело не только в воспитании, но и в особенностях нервной системы.
По его теории, интроверты легче обучаются через последствия своих поступков. Их нервная система быстрее формирует устойчивые связи между действием и наказанием, поэтому социальные нормы усваиваются легче.
Экстравертам, напротив, для формирования таких связей тре…
Как связаны между собой травма отвержения и тяга к роскоши?
Если внутри человека живёт страх быть отвергнутым, он ищет доказательства собственной ценности снаружи. Внешние атрибуты становятся сообщением миру:
«Со мной всё в порядке. Меня можно выбрать. Меня нельзя отвергнуть».
Предметы роскоши, как и шопоголизм, могут притупить чувство неполноценности, но не могут его вылечить.
Поэтому человек покупает всё больше…
🔥8❤3🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @annlamart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Модная истерика @fashionisterika · 112,545 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Март | психология” (@annlamart), 4,138 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annlamart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.