Channel
@angelinavangorclub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,471subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001672319868 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @angelinavangorclub |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/angelinavangorclub |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 1,471 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 1,478 | -10 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 1,488 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 1,492 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 1,497 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 1,499 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 1,503 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 1,506 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 1,510 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 1,511 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 1,513 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 1,518 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 1,519 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 1,519 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 40.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 22.2% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Tom Ford пополняют свою табачную коллекцию новой композицией Tobacco Chocolat от парфюмера Даниэла Андрие🤎 Табачная тема давно вдохновляет бренд, и именно Tobacco Chocolat создан на основе эксклюзивного аккорда какао с дымными полутонами, где насыщенные оттенки шоколада переплетаются с землистой терпкостью табака. Ноты: апельсин, дым, какао, пачули, перуанский бальзам, табак, темный шоколад, амброфикс.
❤2👍2🔥2
Продолжаем возвращение в 90-ые с камбека парфюмерной линии Gap. Спустя тридцать два после первого запуска Gap переосмыслил свои ароматы Dream, Grass, Heaven и Om, а также представил новую композицию Harmony. В рекламной кампании, получившей название "Wear What You Feel", снялась американская актриса Виктория Педретти. Dream: бергамот, жасмин, кедр. Grass: мандарин, чай, матча, кедр. Heaven: груша, ваниль, пачули. O…
❤2👍2😁2
Summer Fridays выпускают серию парфюмированных мистов и в пару к ним бартеры для тела с одноименными отдушками — Vanilla, Pistachio Milk и Pink Guava. Композиции миста универсальны: для мужчин и женщин, подходят для всех типов кожи, волос и одежды, а так же их модно смешивать для создания уникальных ароматов. Vanilla: амбра, мускус, ванильный пирог. Pistachio Milk: дерево, фисташка, малина, молоко, сахар. Pink Guav…
❤4👏1🔥1😁1
Новости с полей: Зендая объявлена новой Prada Girl и глобальным амбассадором Prada Beauty, став лицом аромата Paradoxe. «Мне нравится, как Paradoxe прославляет сложность, захватывая как силу, так и уязвимость, не пытаясь подставить или определить кого-то. Для меня ароматы, которые мы выбираем, являются отражением того, как мы движемся по миру. Присоединение к бренду кажется совершенно естественным продолжением этого…
❤3👍2🥰2🥴1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @angelinavangorclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AngelinaVangor” (@angelinavangorclub), 1,471 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angelinavangorclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.