Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Блог анестезиолога

Channel

Блог анестезиолога

@anesthesiologists_blog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

22,375subscribers

-463 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001338533624
TypeChannel
Username@anesthesiologists_blog
Created28 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held50
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/anesthesiologists_blog

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,37522,83822,606.56 August 2026 — 22,838 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,838 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,834 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,827 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,823 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,813 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,802 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,798 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,792 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,789 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,787 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,782 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,767 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,763 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,759 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,749 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,746 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,744 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,737 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,732 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,725 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,721 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,718 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,709 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,695 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,685 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,683 subscribers8 September 2026 — 22,662 subscribers11 September 2026 — 22,583 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,565 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,553 subscribers16 September 2026 — 22,549 subscribers18 September 2026 — 22,537 subscribers24 September 2026 — 22,516 subscribers3 October 2026 — 22,488 subscribers8 October 2026 — 22,471 subscribers12 October 2026 — 22,459 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,450 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,446 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,444 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,442 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,437 subscribers19 October 2026 — 22,431 subscribers20 October 2026 — 22,423 subscribers21 October 2026 — 22,413 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,402 subscribers23 October 2026 — 22,394 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,387 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,381 subscribers26 October 2026 — 22,375 subscribers6 August 202626 October 2026
50 measurements spanning 81 days, net -463. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,306–22,907 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 15:0922,375-6
25 Oct 2026, 12:4522,381-6
24 Oct 2026, 16:0022,387-7
23 Oct 2026, 12:5822,394-8
22 Oct 2026, 13:3722,402-11
21 Oct 2026, 05:3722,413-10
20 Oct 2026, 06:3722,423-8
19 Oct 2026, 07:3122,431-6
18 Oct 2026, 03:5722,437-5
17 Oct 2026, 05:5722,442-2
16 Oct 2026, 08:1622,444-2
15 Oct 2026, 09:5022,446-4
14 Oct 2026, 10:0122,450-9
12 Oct 2026, 19:3722,459-12
8 Oct 2026, 05:4122,471-17
3 Oct 2026, 15:1822,488-28
24 Sept 2026, 20:5722,516-21
18 Sept 2026, 19:5822,537-12
16 Sept 2026, 10:1822,549-4
14 Sept 2026, 16:4122,553first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 22,375 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,130
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026
Posts held38 (27 May 2026 – 20 October 2026)
Views total25,029
Reactions total828
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Oct 2026, 08:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 02s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,795 reactions across 38 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,76540.7%
🔥93013.7%
👍6389.39%
😱4897.20%
🤯4146.09%
😢3144.62%
💯2463.62%
🤣1812.66%
🤪1812.66%
😭1512.22%
🙏1211.78%
🤔1161.71%
👀731.07%
🥰350.515%
🙈280.412%
😁270.397%
👏260.383%
💊240.353%
😍90.132%
custom 521537972383568922970.103%
7 further kinds200.294%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,795 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 20 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 38 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anesthesiologists_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 20 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Oct 2026, 11:05 UTC959 views116 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Photo

Осенние вайбы Беларуси

🔥78❤32🥰6

19 Oct 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,400 views15 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Photo

Мы постоянно читаем нотации пациентам: «Следите за здоровьем, худейте, занимайтесь спортом!» Ага, очень интересно. А сами? Отработал сутки в РАО, остался на подработку, а из физической активности у тебя — только СЛР до хруста ребер да забег с тяжелой каталкой на КТ Какой тут фитнес-зал за 5000 рублей? Пока туда доедешь, уже пора обратно на дежурство Поэтому мой спортзал теперь всегда со мной в телефоне. Я перешел …

❤13🔥2

18 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,940 views123 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

Это ж сколько нужно употребить тонкого плана, чтобы такую чушь нести. Кстати, под видосом 14 к лойсов и тысячи поддерживающих комментариев.

🤣76💊24🤯12😭5👀3❤1👏1🤔1

17 Oct 2026, 15:27 UTC≈2,210 views46 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Photo

Самопроверка и освежить в памяти: Клинический случай: Пациентка, 67 лет, доставлена в инфекционное отделение с жалобами на многократную рвоту, водянистый стул с примесью слизи и резкую слабость. За 3 дня до госпитализации перенесла острую кишечную инфекцию смешанной этиологии (подтверждено ПЦР на Escherichia coli O157:H7 и Shigella). В анамнезе: гипертоническая болезнь II стадии, сахарный диабет 2 типа. Объективны…

❤29🤔13🔥4

6 Oct 2026, 19:44 UTC≈3,880 views219 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

Неочевидные факты о чуме 1. «Черная смерть» — это не название болезни, а описание симптомов. При септической форме токсины бактерий повреждают эндотелий, запускается системное воспаление, тромбоз, ДВС-синдром и некроз. Пальцы, уши и носы пациентов действительно чернели из-за некроза. Так что средневековые художники рисовали вполне реалистичный медицинский атлас. 2. Чума — ровесница мамонтов. Предок Yersinia pestis …

❤179👍30🥰6🔥4

3 Oct 2026, 17:52 UTC≈4,280 views8 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Poll

У вас есть амбиции стать руководителем в медицине? Заведующих не берём, начиная от +/- главврача клиники.

  1. Да (медик)18%
  2. Нет (медик)47%
  3. Да (не медик)6%
  4. Нет (не медик)31%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤8

3 Oct 2026, 09:27 UTC≈4,550 views131 reactionsread 21 October 2026

Как можно в 37-38 лет допиться до цирроза печени? Чтобы прям весь организм разваливался от массивного кровотечения из вен пищевода, до сепсиса. В моем понимании магазинным алкоголем так навредить себе очень сложно. Хотя, это возраст вполне себе почтенный, как минимум раньше. Сорокалетние неандертальцы в антропологии считаются долгожителями.

🤯96👀16❤9🙈5🤣4🍾1

27 Sept 2026, 16:41 UTC≈5,810 views170 reactionsread 21 October 2026

Продолжение Так вот, событие в голове случилось, тромб ликвидировали, или нет. Как мы помним, дальше человек либо умирает, либо становится инвалидом, либо отстраивается в той или иной степени (процесс до года). Но от чего умирает пациент? Одной из проблем с которую до сих пор уверенно не могут решить — это отёк головного мозга. Плюс, вазоконстрикция. Ишемия, повреждение и некроз головного мозга — это неврологическа…

🔥88🙏48❤24💯10

25 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC≈4,980 views207 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Photo

Ля, смотрите какой гриб нашел. Василёк, гиропорус синеющий.

🔥123🤪40❤23😍8👍6🤔6💋1

24 Sept 2026, 17:05 UTC≈5,450 views162 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Photo

Тихий взрыв Одной из самых опасных сосудистых катастроф является — острое нарушение мозгового кровообращения (ОНМК), оно же инсульт. В структуре пациентов в реанимации неврологические занимают видное место. Сегодня поговорим в первую очередь про ишемические инсульты. Что вам нужно знать, чтобы вовремя распознать инсульт? Начнем с того, что состояние это максимально экстренное, ведь каждую минуту погибает порядка 1…

❤125🔥20👍13💋4

23 Sept 2026, 05:04 UTC≈3,560 views147 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

Я, конечно, знал, что у нас на работе куркули, но чтобы забрать домой последнее казённое молоко из холодильника... Утром даже кофий не с чем пить. Кстати, купил книгу про наших мальчиков.

❤93🤣40👍14

21 Sept 2026, 18:04 UTC≈4,210 views203 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Очередной мужчина 60+ весь день отказывался от госпитализации СМП, пока к вечеру не стал вмирать. Привезли с отеком легких, в шоке, спутанном сознании. Стенты бахнули, а толку, миокард погиб. Вопрос доживёт ли до утра. Я не знаю сколько должно быть ещё сказано слов про симптомы инфаркта, сколько знакомых и друзей наших людей должны умереть, чтобы в голове что-то ёкнуло и люди внимательнее относились к своему здоровь…

😭137🙏27💯23❤13👏2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @anesthesiologists_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Oct 2026, 17:52 UTCAnonymous Poll828 voters

У вас есть амбиции стать руководителем в медицине? Заведующих не берём, начиная от +/- главврача клиники.

  1. Да (медик)18%
  2. Нет (медик)47%
  3. Да (не медик)6%
  4. Нет (не медик)31%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Jun 2026, 11:09 UTCAnonymous Poll1,120 voters approx.

Насколько хорошо вы переносите натуральный кофе? Речь даже не про тахикардию или повышение АД, а про нарушения в работе ЖКТ, различной степени выраженности, вплоть до месячных расстройств пищеварения.

  1. Пью любой кофе с кайфом, жалоб нет🤘78%
  2. Пью растворимый, натуральный не переношу6%
  3. Не пью кофе17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 20 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блог анестезиолога” (@anesthesiologists_blog), 22,375 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anesthesiologists_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.