Channel
@andrew128128
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,557subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001594202532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @andrew128128 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/andrew128128 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 4,557 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 4,563 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 4,564 | +10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 4,554 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 4,559 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 4,562 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 4,562 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (23 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,121 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 19 | 29.2% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 24.6% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 15.4% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 10.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @andrew128128. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎁Бесплатный дом, хотели бы? Представьте: вам предлагают дом за 0 рублей. Не старый сарай, а настоящий дом с садом, домиком для гостей, парковкой на несколько автомобилей и даже участком сельхозземли. Звучит как розыгрыш? ⛩️А в Японии это реальность, т.к там уже много лет наблюдается серьёзный демографический спад, и много молодых людей уезжают в более крупные города. В итоге по всей стране накопилось около 9 милл…
👍4💯2❤1
О том, как вернуть налоговый вычет, можно подумать завтра. Сегодня можно спокойно прогуляться по белокаменной 😄 Хорошего воскресения!
🔥3
💬 Давайте сверимся. Что вам интереснее читать в этом канале?
The shares total 244%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Есть объекты недвижимости, спрос на которые определяется повседневной жизнью человека. Догадываетесь, о чём речь? О ГАБах — готовом арендном бизнесе. Этот сегмент считается одним из самых устойчивых в коммерческой недвижимости, потому что его фундамент — базовые потребности людей. 🧲Так значит я просто беру пустое помещение и ищу арендатора? Не совсем. При выборе помещения важно: • локация • пешеходный трафик • …
👍1🔥1
Не пропустите август! 😄
🤣7👍3💯2
«Андрей, если экономика проекта дает нужную нам доходность, не жди, пока цена станет еще ниже. Потому что объект может купить кто-то другой». Эту мысль мне однажды сказал партнер. И за годы инвестирования я не раз убеждался, насколько она правильная. В 2016 году я работал в найме. Один из клиентов попросил подобрать объект, и я с головой погрузился в рынок новостроек Москвы: изучал проекты, общался с агентами и зас…
👍2❤1
Можно ли сегодня рассматривать жилую недвижимость как инструмент для заработка? «Куплю пару квартир, сдам в аренду и буду жить на пассивный доход». 📊 Сегодня долгосрочная аренда жилой недвижимости в среднем приносит 5–7% годовых. Хотите больше? Можно перейти в посуточную аренду и увеличить доходность примерно до 8–12% годовых. Но это уже полноценный операционный бизнес со всеми его расходами и постоянным управлен…
❤3💯3👍2
День знаний позади. И, честно говоря, мы с командой до сих пор под впечатлением. Самое ценное после любого мероприятия — это обратная связь. В этот раз мы получили её и лично после выступлений, и через анкеты, которые заполнили участники. Чаще всего повторялось: 💬 «Проводите такие мероприятия чаще!» 💬 «Полдня — то, что нужно. Не успели устать и перегрузиться информацией.» 💬 «Круглые столы — огонь!» Мы специаль…
🔥7👍4❤3
Channel name was changed to «Андрей Любунь | Инвестиции в недвижимость»
Надеюсь, что такое выходные, переводить не надо! 😄
🤣6🔥2❤1
📊 В последнее время нельзя однозначно сказать, что рынок недвижимости вырастет, упадёт или будет стагнировать. Предлагаю разобрать 5 разных сегментов: 🔻Квартиры Резкого роста цен на жильё в ближайшее время я не ожидаю. Новостройки, вероятнее всего, будут находиться в стадии стагнации с ростом примерно на уровне инфляции, а вторичный рынок может оказаться устойчивее за счёт более высокого спроса. 🔻Офисы До увелич…
👍3🔥3❤1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @andrew128128. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
💬 Давайте сверимся. Что вам интереснее читать в этом канале?
The shares total 244%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Андрей Любунь | Инвестиции в недвижимость” (@andrew128128), 4,557 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andrew128128.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.