Channel
@amplifr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,543subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001003354492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amplifr |
| Created | 22 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amplifr |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 2,543 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 2,545 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 2,544 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 2,548 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 2,545 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 2,548 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 2,546 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 2,547 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 2,547 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
286 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 95 | 33.2% | |
| 😢 | 88 | 30.8% | |
| ❤ | 56 | 19.6% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 8.04% | |
| 🎉 | 16 | 5.59% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 2.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 286reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2021 to 1 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Здравствуйте, это команда Амплифера, мы приняли решение закрыть компанию. На развитие продукта в текущих условиях нет ресурсов, поэтому мы собираемся прекратить его поддержку в ближайшее время. Если вы используете Амплифер — проверьте электронный ящик, связанный с аккаунтом. Мы отправили подробное описание процесса завершения сотрудничества. Мы закроем регистрацию новых пользователей 7 ноября. Аккаунты с подпиской…
😢88❤24👍11🎉9👎4
Всем привет, На связи команда Амплифера Мы приостанавливаем публикацию развлекательного контента в социальных сетях. Для наших клиентов ничего не изменится: Амплифер продолжает работать, публиковать посты и собирать статистику. Берегите себя.
👍30❤17🔥3👎2🎉1
Первый шаг в продвижении — оформление страницы 📝 Собрали в блоге подробную инструкцию для «ВКонтакте»: http://amp.gs/jZE2a
👍7🔥3
Как делать фотографии для Инстаграма, чтобы их лайкали, сохраняли и репостили? ⭐ Собрали 7 советов, которые помогут разобраться: http://amp.gs/jZpVu
👍4❤2👎2🎉1🔥1
Пост для тех, кто утомился к вечеру пятницы 😴 Держите подборку сериалов для отдыха и вдохновения: http://amp.gs/jZ121
❤9👍6
Чем «Яндекс. Дзен» поможет бизнесу?😎 Рассказываем в блоге и предлагаем сразу 3 формата для продвижения: http://amp.gs/jZIKF
👍3🎉2
Подписчики в Инстаграме не должны скучать ☃️ Поэтому собрали 6 интерактивных механик, которые разнообразят «Истории»: http://amp.gs/jm5Fm
👍7
Чтобы понимать, какая соцсеть приносит клиентов, проанализируйте трафик 📊 Как это сделать с помощью аналитических систем и Амплифера, рассказываем в блоге: http://amp.gs/jmwp6
👍2
Новости за январь 🗞️ • Платная подписка на контент в Инстаграме; • YouTube недостаточно защищает от фейковых новостей; • Исчезающий текст и реакции в Телеграме; • Канье Уэст против NFT. Подробности в блоге: http://amp.gs/jmKBU
👍4🎉2❤1
Чтобы такого написать и поднять сайт в поисковой выдаче...🙄 Собрали 10 советов, как с помощью контента получить больше трафика и улучшить рейтинг сайта: http://amp.gs/jmNbj
🔥4👍3
Реакций и комментариев всем!😎 Держите подробную инструкцию, как их включить в Телеграме: http://amp.gs/jmUdj
❤2👍1
3 приложения, которые помогут создать классное видео для Инстаграма 🎬 Рассказываем, где монтировать, добавлять эффекты и накладывать музыку: http://amp.gs/jmV1X
👍4❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @amplifr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 786,131 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Amplifr” (@amplifr), 2,543 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amplifr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.