new guideline of kidney stone
❤30👍4🔥3⚡2

Channel
@amcuccessmcqchannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7,861subscribers
+875 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002502140012 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amcuccessmcqchannel |
| Description | Just only mcq |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amcuccessmcqchannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 7,861 | +176 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 7,685 | +134 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 7,551 | +108 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 7,443 | +167 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 7,276 | +203 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 7,073 | +83 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 6,990 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 6,986 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:19 | 6,986 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
665 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 593 | 89.2% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 6.17% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 1.80% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 0.902% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.752% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.602% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.451% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 665reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
new guideline of kidney stone
❤30👍4🔥3⚡2
emedici
❤6
File, posted without a caption
❤22👍6
⚠️There is something I want to say openly and honestly. Over the years, and recently I have received countless screenshots, messages, and feedback from successful candidates. Many of them have told me that a large proportion of the recalls and materials they saw elsewhere originated from our files and our community contributions. Some candidates even asked me to restrict access to the files. They suggested disablin…
❤333👍19💯10👏3🥰3🔥2
‼️If you are preparing for exam so please be smart enough to follow the group rules • Check pinned messages always, as important announcement will be pinned! • we can't serve over 13k doctors if they DM admins! Try to serve yourself by following announcements! • Thanks
👍9❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5👍3
⚠️AMC 2026 Private Group – 3 Simple Steps Hello Doctors 👨⚕️👩⚕️ If you have booked your AMC exam, please follow ONLY these 3 steps before requesting to join: 1️⃣ Send your placement proof 📩 Send your AMC exam booking screenshot/PDF to the admin for approval 2️⃣ Update your Telegram name 👉 Format: First Name | Exam Month | Exam Date Example: John 16th May 3️⃣ Join your exam-month group 🔗 Select ONLY your mont…
❤28
So, a lot of people have inquired about my preparation strategy in DM and whether I have actually cracked it on Tuesday. Yes I did and thanks to Almighty first and my family and this group especially Dr Shabbir and co. They were amazing. But I recommend others to book on later dates as I was left with only Tuesday that's why I had to ultimately go for it. So, what I did was that I made notes from RACGP, rch, SA heal…
❤52
I had been preparing for this exam since July last year, but my preparation was quite inconsistent due to some personal challenges. I came across this group in April, and it truly turned things around for me. I honestly don't think I would have been able to ace the exam without the support, guidance, and resources provided here. Thank you so much, Dr. Shabbir and the entire team. May God bless you in all your future …
❤4💯2🥰2🔥1
🎉 Congratulations to All AMC MCQ Candidates! 🎉 A huge congratulations to everyone who successfully passed the AMC MCQ Exam! Your hard work, dedication, and persistence have truly paid off. Wishing you all the very best as you move forward to the next stage of your medical journey. 👏🌟 To those who did not get the result you hoped for this time — please remember: this is absolutely not the end of your journey. Countl…
❤41🕊1
This was my second time taking the AMC MCQ exam. My first attempt was back in 2022. At that time, I did very little preparation. There were no AMC Success groups, no eMedici, and I was completely on my own. This time was different. I prepared for six months. I completed nearly 5,000 eMedici questions, used Amedex to build my theoretical foundation, and worked through the 2025 and 2026 recall questions. If you ask m…
❤42⚡2
Passed Alhumdullilah
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @amcuccessmcqchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@amcuccessmcqchannel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AMC SUCCESS MCQ CHANNEL” (@amcuccessmcqchannel), 7,861 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amcuccessmcqchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.