Broad Risk Expansion Pushes Altcoins Into Stronger Weekly Momentum β’ Total market cap: $2.44T β’ 24h volume: $158.43B β’ BTC dominance: 59.2% β’ ETH dominance: 11.4% The market is showing broad participation, with nearly every major visible asset positive across both the daily and weekly frames. Trading activity is elevated at $158.43B, while ETH dominance at 11.4% accompanies stronger performance across several largeβ¦

Channel
Altcoin Alpha π
@altcoin_alpha
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry
25,644subscribers
-325 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002490627121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @altcoin_alpha |
| Description | 𧬠Hunting down the next 50x? We break down low-cap altcoins, new narratives, and upcoming launches with deep analysis and brutal honesty. Only real alpha, no paid shills. @net_admin_global |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/altcoin_alpha |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 25,644 | -28 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 25,672 | -24 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 25,696 | -25 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 25,721 | -23 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 25,744 | -25 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 25,769 | -26 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 25,795 | -26 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 25,821 | -39 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 25,860 | -20 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 25,880 | -19 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 25,899 | -24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 25,923 | -15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 25,938 | -17 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 25,955 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 25,969 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 25,969 | first reading |
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 22.6%
- avg views Γ· 25,644 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,790
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.68%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (13 July 2026 β 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 115,764 |
| Reactions total | 1,769 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 293
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 23 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,967 reactions across 27 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 342 | 11.5% | |
| π | 341 | 11.5% | |
| π― | 340 | 11.5% | |
| π | 332 | 11.2% | |
| π₯ | 329 | 11.1% | |
| π₯° | 329 | 11.1% | |
| π€© | 318 | 10.7% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 317 | 10.7% | |
| β€ | 316 | 10.7% | |
| π | 1 | 0.034% | |
| π | 1 | 0.034% | |
| π | 1 | 0.034% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 2,967reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 30 we hold a reading for Β· 3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @altcoin_alpha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
ETH and HYPE Drive a Broad Market Expansion β’ Total market cap: $2.21T β’ 24h volume: $48.21B β’ BTC dominance: 58.8% β’ ETH dominance: 10.5% Market breadth has improved sharply, with most major assets posting strong daily gains and several extending double-digit weekly advances. ETH is outperforming BTC, while HYPE, SOL, XRP, ZEC, and LINK confirm that momentum has expanded well beyond Bitcoin. πΉExpansion Leaders β’β¦
π₯12π€©11π₯°11β€βπ₯10π9π―9π9β€8
Core Assets Recover as Weekly Rotation Remains Concentrated β’ Total market cap: $2.19T β’ 24h volume: $48.85B β’ BTC dominance: 58.8% β’ ETH dominance: 10.5% The market is showing a more constructive daily tone, with BTC, ETH, SOL, LINK, ADA, and XRP all trading higher. Weekly structure remains uneven, however, as strength is still concentrated in a limited group while several large and mid-cap altcoins remain negativβ¦
π19π16β€βπ₯15π₯14π14π€©13β€12π―11
BTC Firms as Altcoin Momentum Splits β’ Total market cap: $2.18T β’ 24h volume: $41.53B β’ BTC dominance: 58.5% β’ ETH dominance: 10.5% The market remains balanced near $2.18T, but performance is increasingly fragmented beneath the headline level. Bitcoin is positive on the day while several altcoins continue to weaken, leaving market breadth uneven despite clear strength in ZEC, HYPE, LINK, and XMR. πΉBenchmark Split β¦
β€βπ₯20π17π€©16π₯°15π14π―14π14π₯13
Daily Rebound Broadens While Weekly Structure Stays Uneven β’ Total market cap: $2.17T β’ 24h volume: $26.60B β’ BTC dominance: 58.4% β’ ETH dominance: 10.5% Daily breadth has improved, with most visible assets trading higher over 24 hours. The weekly picture remains fragmented, however, as BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL, ADA, and several other assets are still negative. Low market-wide volume also keeps the rebound from showing bβ¦
π₯°5π4π€©3β€2π2π―2π1
Weekly Leaders Hold as Daily Pressure Broadens β’ Total market cap: $2.18T β’ 24h volume: $47.87B β’ BTC dominance: 58.5% β’ ETH dominance: 10.4% The market is broadly weaker on the daily frame, with most major assets trading lower over 24 hours. Weekly performance remains more differentiated: LINK, XMR, SOL, BNB, and HYPE are still positive, while ADA, LEO, BCH, and ZEC remain under heavier pressure. This keeps the maβ¦
Altcoin Rotation Strengthens as BTC and ETH Stay Soft β’ Total market cap: $2.19T β’ 24h volume: $56.70B β’ BTC dominance: 58.6% β’ ETH dominance: 10.5% The market remains mixed, with Bitcoin and Ethereum both negative across the daily and weekly frames while selected altcoins continue to attract momentum. Higher 24-hour activity is supporting rotation, but the strength is concentrated rather than broad-based. πΉRotatiβ¦
π18π€©13β€βπ₯12π12π₯°11π―10β€9π9
ETH and LINK Outperform as Bitcoin Slips β’ Total market cap: $2.19T β’ 24h volume: $54.61B β’ BTC dominance: 58.7% β’ ETH dominance: 10.4% Market structure is increasingly divergent: Bitcoin is slightly negative across both timeframes, while ETH, BNB, SOL, LINK, and DOGE are showing stronger momentum. BTC dominance remains high, but strength is spreading selectively into large caps and a small group of altcoins ratherβ¦
π―15β€13π13π€©13π₯°13π13π12π₯10
Daily Pullback Tests Weekly Altcoin Resilience β’ Total market cap: $2.21T β’ 24h volume: $44.65B β’ BTC dominance: 58.9% β’ ETH dominance: 10.4% The market is under broad daily pressure, with BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ZEC, and ADA all trading lower over 24 hours. Weekly structure is more resilient in several assets, creating a clear divergence between short-term weakness and medium-term relative strength. Elevated BTC dominβ¦
π15π13π₯12π11π₯°10π€©9β€8π―8
Weekly Structure Improves as XMR and SOL Extend Relative Strength β’ Total market cap: $2.22T β’ 24h volume: $34.83B β’ BTC dominance: 58.9% β’ ETH dominance: 10.5% The market is holding a firmer weekly structure, with BTC, ETH, BNB, and SOL all positive over seven days. Daily breadth is less uniform, however, as several altcoins remain under pressure while XMR stands out with strong gains across both timeframes. Lowerβ¦
π19π13π―11π₯11π€©11π10β€7π₯°7
ADA Breaks Away as Large Caps Lose Momentum β’ Total market cap: $2.19T β’ 24h volume: $56.58B β’ BTC dominance: 58.8% β’ ETH dominance: 10.4% The market is showing renewed short-term pressure across most major assets, while strength is increasingly concentrated in a small group of altcoins. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both slightly negative across the daily and weekly frames, but ADA, XMR, and selected weekly leaders conβ¦
β€20π₯°14π€©12π₯10π9π―9β€βπ₯8π7
ETH Regains Momentum While Rotation Stays Concentrated β’ Total market cap: $2.19T β’ 24h volume: $56.22B β’ BTC dominance: 58.8% β’ ETH dominance: 10.3% The market is holding a firmer structure as both Bitcoin and Ethereum trade positive across the daily and weekly frames. Liquidity remains active, but elevated BTC dominance shows that capital has not yet rotated broadly into altcoins. Strength is concentrated in a liβ¦
π₯°16β€βπ₯15π15β€10π₯10π8π€©7π6
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @altcoin_alpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βAltcoin Alpha πβ (@altcoin_alpha), 25,644 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/altcoin_alpha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.