Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الفلاقة العراقية

Channel

الفلاقة العراقية

@alfalaqa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,771subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001727124723
TypeChannel
Username@alfalaqa
Created25 May 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alfalaqa

Growth

2,7712,7872,7797 August 2026 — 2,787 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,785 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,780 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,778 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,777 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,775 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,771 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 17 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,769–2,789 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 07:292,771-4
21 Aug 2026, 01:552,775-2
17 Aug 2026, 18:092,777-1
14 Aug 2026, 13:592,778-2
11 Aug 2026, 02:352,780-5
7 Aug 2026, 21:422,785-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:162,787first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 25 May 2022the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

937 reactions across 5 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
34636.9%
👍24426.0%
🔥14615.6%
👌697.36%
👏454.80%
😁212.24%
🤣161.71%
🥰90.961%
🤔80.854%
😱70.747%
🤡70.747%
🎉40.427%
😢40.427%
🤮40.427%
🤬30.32%
🐳20.213%
🤩20.213%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 937reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2022 to 24 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jan 2026, 22:10 UTC≈1,090 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

للي يريد يدخل بعالم الامن السيبراني 😈 ويتعلم الأشياء المستحيلة ننصحكم بالانضمام لهذا حدث الرهيب والمستقبلي https://www.instagram.com/p/DT6Mw_CADQi/?img_index=1&igsh=Yjdsc2RzbmRqNTB3

6🤣1

9 Oct 2024, 22:46 UTC≈9,680 views109 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ملاحظة : هذه الشخصية هي المسؤولة الاول في عملية تفجير البيجر

👌5913👍12🤣8🤔6😢4🔥3🤬3

9 Oct 2024, 22:42 UTC≈37,300 views142 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

قوله تعالى ( فمن اعتدى عليكم فاعتدوا عليه بمثل ما اعتدى عليكم ) {البقرة 194} حصري ⚠️ مسؤول في وحدة 8200 في الاستخبارات العسكرية الاسرائلية وأماكن تواجده ومعلوماته الشخصية يرجى من الإخوة المجاهدين السرعة في التعامل معه من مواليد 1988 يعمل في تل ابيب ويقيم في حيفا الكيان المحتل متزوج من "Ziva Zure " ومسجلة باسم زوجها باسم "Ziva Cohen" لديهم طفلين يعمل مسؤول في جهاز الاستخبارات في جيش الدفاع الاسرائيلي تحديدا الوح

🔥77👍289🤣7😱7👌4😁4🤮3

2 Feb 2023, 18:01 UTC≈13,400 views192 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍133🔥25😁14🤡7👌6👏4🐳21

25 May 2022, 15:24 UTC≈19,400 views487 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اهلا شبابنا الابطال الغيارى بالبداية خلينا انعرفكم ليش اختارينا هل اسم ( الفلاقة ) هو تعبير يطلق مجازاً على أشخاص من عامة الناس استطاعوا حمل السلاح والقتال تلبية ً لنداء الوطن ولاستقلاله -هدف اطلاق الفريق هو مشاركة كل مواطن عراقي بالدفاع عن المظلومين حول العالم المبادئ العامة للفلاقة -وجد فريقنا بالأساس لتقديم الدعم السيبراني لجمهورية العراق -مساندة المجاهدين -عمل جيش الفلاقة هو ردع اي خطر يهدد الامن القومي العر

317👍71👏41🔥41🥰9🎉3😁3🤩2

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @alfalaqa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 340,203 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الفلاقة العراقية” (@alfalaqa), 2,771 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alfalaqa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.