Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alex Becker Insider 🎯

Channel

Alex Becker Insider 🎯

@alexbecker_insider

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

1,520subscribers

-278 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002311145994
TypeChannel
Username@alexbecker_insider
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alexbecker_insider

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5201,7981,6597 August 2026 — 1,798 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,798 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,785 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,702 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,520 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -278. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,478–1,840 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:051,520-182
10 Aug 2026, 20:481,702-83
8 Aug 2026, 06:371,785-13
7 Aug 2026, 15:471,798no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:501,798first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.1%
avg views ÷ 1,520 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.5
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (21 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total29
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$KHC The advance from the wave ii low has so far developed in 3 waves, so a larger low is not confirmed yet. Price is trying to build an upside reversal pattern, with the orange zone now the support area for a possible wave (4).

6 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$SOL Solana has reached a key support area, where a larger recovery is becoming increasingly possible. While the broader bear market outlook remains unchanged, the short-term structure is improving.

5 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$ETH Ethereum remains in a corrective structure despite holding above the former bear market trend line. The recovery from the June low reached resistance in only a 3-wave move, leaving the larger bearish structure intact and providing no confirmation that a major low has formed.

4 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Performance of a recent VIP signal👆 Coin: $ALT Take Profit 1 (0.005980$)✅ Take Profit 2 (0.005860$)✅ Take Profit 3 (0.005720$)✅ Take Profit 4 (0.005600$)✅ Our VIP members successfully realized a 100% profit from this signal and have subsequently closed their positions. For information on joining our VIP service, please contact @confidentialcircleVIP

4 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$ARQQ Is this 1-2 setup holding or failing? Elliott Wave Analysis #Arqit

4 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$UBER Is this the start of a B-wave recovery or a trap? Elliott Wave Analysis #UBER

3 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$ADA Cardano remains in a broader bear market, with the larger downtrend still favoring another move lower. A corrective wave 4 bounce is becoming increasingly likely, but unless the structure turns impulsively bullish, it would still be viewed as a temporary recovery rather than a trend reversal.

3 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Almost there. The hardest part of every cycle isn't buying. It's having the patience to let the process play out. If history rhymes, the next major opportunity may not be far away. $BTC #Bitcoin

30 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$FET The price is now testing the February low. It is becoming more and more probable that wave iv has topped already and that wave C of v is already unfolding.

29 Jul 2026, 07:39 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026

🚀 Top Trending Coins (Today) 1. CSPR 2. HYPE 3. BTC 4. PENGU 5. COTI 6. KAS 7. BNKR 8. SOL 9. ETH 10. ONDO 11. LIT 12. ANSEM 13. MON 14. TAO 15. SEI @confidentialcircleVIP

29 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$ZW1! Is the current pullback a finished 1-2 setup? Elliott Wave Analysis #Wheat

29 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$ADA The last decline looks like a 5-wave move, which could represent wave 1 of (3) to the downside. Micro resistance is located between $0.164 and $0.175. The situation remains unchanged. #Cardano

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @alexbecker_insider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alex Becker Insider 🎯” (@alexbecker_insider), 1,520 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexbecker_insider.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.