Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Аирдропы в Telegram 💎

Channel

Аирдропы в Telegram 💎

@airdrops_tgm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,506subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002026270599
TypeChannel
Username@airdrops_tgm
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/airdrops_tgm

Growth

1,5061,5291,517.57 August 2026 — 1,529 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,529 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,526 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,520 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,517 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,510 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,508 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,507 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,506 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,503–1,532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 09:431,506-1
27 Aug 2026, 02:471,507-1
23 Aug 2026, 19:061,508-2
19 Aug 2026, 22:351,510-7
16 Aug 2026, 21:531,517-3
13 Aug 2026, 18:271,520-6
10 Aug 2026, 16:031,526-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:331,529no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:391,529first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

648 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23536.3%
🔥20431.5%
👍16926.1%
🤬294.48%
🍾81.23%
😱20.309%
🌚10.154%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 648 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2024 to 17 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
40
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @airdrops_tgm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 December 2024 to 17 January 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jan 2025, 18:24 UTC≈3,170 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Заходим повторно фармить WOOF 🐶 Период - 14 дней https://t.me/earn/join?startapp=j_6_r_Nl8zNTY5MzQ

21🔥14🤬13

15 Jan 2025, 14:15 UTC≈3,080 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🐸 Влетаем в новый пул @earn! В прошлый раз за один час фарма удалось заработать больше $PX, чем за несколько месяцев усилий. Думаю, объяснять, почему этот пул заслуживает внимания, не нужно. И да, фармить можно не только стандартным способом, но и за NFT из основной коллекции. Пулы не ждут, времени всего то 22 часа 🚀

🔥2015🤬5

10 Jan 2025, 15:10 UTC≈2,690 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🪙 EARN новый Launchpool $PX (NotPixel) Залетаем ➡️ EARN Заходим, привязываем кошелек и фарми токены $PX Для держателей: NOT, TON, BUILD, DOGS, ANON Период фарма: 10 января – 14 января

🔥2621🤬4🍾3

2 Jan 2025, 17:09 UTC≈3,080 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кстати проверил вывод в XLM Выводил на BYBIY Вывело за минуту, по курсу в принципе тоже самое что и на USDC или на SSLX менять 👍 🔥7$ без вложений, менее чем за день (15 минут) с тапалки норм🎅👨‍💻 ➡️ Играть в gold_eagle_coin

🔥128🤬3🍾1

30 Dec 2024, 22:58 UTC≈3,580 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нашел такой проект (тапалку) 💎Можно сразу выводить средства 🍾И не нужно что-то вкладывать 👌 Что мы делаем? 💸Выполняем задание 💸Приглашаем друзей Получаем токены,конвертируем в USDC и можем выводить на кошельки или биржи🚀 Ссылка📲 (тык) Для вывода нужно иметь аккаунт: https://sl8.online/invite/nVr2VW Завтра дам подробную информацию по выводу, пока регистрируйтесь сначала в социальной сети дальше заходите в тапалк

14🤬3🍾1🔥1

30 Dec 2024, 20:50 UTC≈3,150 views13 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дешевле всего звезды можно купить тут SPLIT

13

30 Dec 2024, 20:34 UTC≈3,010 views16 reactions23 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Купил на 50к звезд и вам советую!

9👍3🔥3😱1

30 Dec 2024, 19:47 UTC≈4,070 views14 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В @sticker_bot завезли пингвинов PENGU Есть паки по 5к и 10к звезд Выглядит как гем на фоне всего хайпа вокруг, пингвины в $ кратно больше чем нот раздали

👍74🔥3

29 Dec 2024, 13:45 UTC≈4,810 views21 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

😱 Новая мини апка от разработчиков BLUM и PAWS Теперь - DONOT Рекомендую закинуть от 0.2-1 TONа Все просто - заходим, нажимаем “cook donot” закидываем TON , получаем тон и токены DONOT на пассиве Мы зашли на 50 TON, по логике должны бодро насыпать, рекомендую закинуть хоть что-то и не скипать🍾 Залетаем изучаем ➡️ DONOT

👍106🔥5

27 Dec 2024, 12:19 UTC≈3,820 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пришел тон за первое колесо фортуны, следующее колесо фортуны по идее на Новый год 🎄 Не забывайте конектить кошельки и ежедневно сбивать по 1 заданию

👍1311🔥8🍾1

25 Dec 2024, 13:44 UTC≈3,130 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤑 TON Wrapped 2024: ваши итоги года в сети! Посмотреть свои достижения за этот год можно ➡️ @toonorgbot А также забираем эксклюзивный бейдж TON Society Тапни👇 чтобы узнать подробнее Экосистема TON добилась впечатляющего прогресса в 2024 году, представив миру новые захватывающие проекты и восторженное сообщество, стремящееся к взаимодействию с Web3. Ваше путешествие — часть этой захватывающей истории, поэтому мы за

16🔥11👍5

24 Dec 2024, 20:05 UTC≈3,290 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💎Розыгрыш 49 TON , будет 7 призовых мест по 7 TON ✅Определение победителей - автоматическое Для участия - просто нажмите учавствовать в посте выше ☝️

11🔥9👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @airdrops_tgm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 747,005 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аирдропы в Telegram 💎” (@airdrops_tgm), 1,506 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airdrops_tgm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.