Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 依柔~的相册💕

Channel

依柔~的相册💕

@adchch568

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,459subscribers

+1,028 since we began measuring on 10 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003883056225
TypeChannel
Username@adchch568
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 November 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/adchch568

Growth

4311,45994510 Nov 2026, 10:22 — 431 subscribers11 Nov 2026, 21:49 — 1,459 subscribers10 Nov 2026, 10:2211 Nov 2026, 21:49
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1,028. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 277–1,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:491,459+1,028
10 Nov 2026, 10:22431first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.6%
avg views ÷ 1,459 subscribers
Avg views / post
417
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.258%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held20 (31 October 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total7,929
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤550.0%
👍550.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 08:04 UTC83 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🎰 番禺依柔半价福利 📮 参与条件: 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-广州茶颜悦色(免费上榜) └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 18 条 🎫 加入-广州茶颜悦色报告群 🎫 加入-依柔~的相册💕 🎫 加入-广州茶颜悦色榜单 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 半价P × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 中奖者三天内出击写报告群内抽奖工兵劵有效期3天,中奖者不兑换需要联系管理回收,否则中奖者抽奖加黑 广州茶颜悦色欢迎各位加入 官方活动现金红包等你领取👏 邀请好友进群得现金红包🧧 发送指令—邀请—即可获取单独邀请码✊✊✊ 邀请规则:进群24小时内发言最少一条为有效邀请,否则视为无效,不计入邀请奖励!此活动有效期2026-11-07至2026-12-07日! 邀请人数奖励: 第1️⃣名:288现金口令红包 第2️⃣名:188现金口令红包 第3️⃣名:88现金口令红包 第4️⃣名:人品666 第5️⃣名:人品666 🔋 人品加成:⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开…

10 Nov 2026, 06:36 UTC116 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🎉 【送福利啦:番禺依柔半价活动+红包】 🎁 活动奖品: • p半价(必须写报告) × 1份 • 18.8红包 × 1份 💰 参与消耗: 免费参与 ⏰ 开奖时间: 2026-11-14 15:00:00 🎫 参与门槛(必须全部加入): 🔹 加入群组---广州牡丹花(交流群) 🔹 加入频道---广州牡丹花公开榜 🔹 加入频道---依柔~的相册💕 🪧 抽奖说明: 🔹 中奖后24小时内兑奖,逾期无效! 🔹 炸号、封号等异常账号视为自动弃奖。 🔹 刷屏、灌水、发言重复,删除,撤回等。 🔹 奖励仅限本人使用,禁止转让或买卖。 🔹 P半价出击完成后必须提交报告,如若不提交,永久拉黑! 🔹 所有中奖信息在中奖区查看 @gzmdh8 ⚠️ 最终解释权归广州牡丹花所有。 💰 积分加票: - 在群里发送 “牡丹花98” ,每次扣 10 积分增加一个抽奖号,每人每天最多增加5个,开奖前每天都可以加(签到可得积分) 兑奖联系: @zhan1…

10 Nov 2026, 06:29 UTC106 viewsread 10 November 2026

广州牡丹花抽奖活动不断,白嫖卷、五折工兵卷、聊天自动抽红包等等,随时都能抽奖。 https://t.me/gzmdh https://t.me/gzmdh1

5 Nov 2026, 05:27 UTC507 viewsread 10 November 2026
Video

生理期来了 哥哥们。休息几天。🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

5 Nov 2026, 05:02 UTC474 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @GZNMMTL

【嫩妹报告】https://t.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】依柔 【联系方式】@zhan1137 【所在位置】番禺 【验证留名】熊猫人的朋友 【验证时间】11.5 【修车费用】6p 【颜值身材】高挑嫩妹 【服务内容】xcz 陪戏 【服务态度】非常好啊 听话的嫩妹更是妙妙妙 【优点缺点】妹妹话少 但是也能正常聊 最主要是很羞涩 【推荐程度】9 【体验细节】朋友心血来潮去了一趟天河 频频碰壁转身转成陀螺了 于是来到了番禺再做一回衰仔 结果挖到了小宝藏 我朋友说妹妹身材很高挑 有差不多170 腿又长又细 但是一手握上去又有肉的那种 熊有个小b这样 妹妹还是个凹陷头 很有吸上来的欲望 前戏也把握了不少时间 妹妹人照9.5 本人化妆了和图片没区别 一样可爱 很合我朋友的口味 最难得是妹妹刚开不久 做这行还很生涩 身上一股子娇羞的感觉真是勾人心魄 虽然是新人但是又不会事b 反…

❤1

3 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC490 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @GZNMMTL

【嫩妹报告】https://t.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】依柔 【联系方式】@zhan1137 【所在位置】番禺 【验证留名】善口(岸) 【验证时间】11.3 【修车费用】600p 【颜值身材】9 人照基本一致 【服务内容】课表都有 【服务态度】9 服务很棒 【优点缺点】 优点:长腿嫩妹,服务态度好,听指挥 【推荐程度】强烈推荐 【体验细节】 第一次来番禺就遇到这么好的老师,真的是非常幸运。本来怀着忐忑的心情约了老师,结果上门一看,一点都没有失望,人照基本一致。真的好高呀,瘦高瘦高的,身材很棒看着非常嫩,一问才刚刚18。简单聊一会天,进入正题。洗完澡出来妹子已经非常主动的脱光光了,坐在床上等着我的宠幸。先躺下感受一下服务,口的过程中一点没有齿感感觉比很多95老师的口都棒。他说一会后让老师躺下。开始给老师反向服务。舔完胸之后,直奔妹子的神秘花园。年纪大了就爱舔,对下面进行重点照顾后,感觉意犹未尽,又躺着指挥妹子坐在我的头…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @adchch568. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“依柔~的相册💕” (@adchch568), 1,459 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adchch568.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.