Photo, posted without a caption
👍1

Channel
@acaipsindicato
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,258subscribers
+213 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002570521311 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @acaipsindicato |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/acaipsindicato |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 1,258 | +204 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:02 | 1,054 | +4 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 1,050 | +1 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 1,049 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 1,050 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 1,049 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 1,048 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 1,047 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 1,046 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 1,045 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 1,048 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 1,046 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 1,045 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 1,045 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 46.2% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 23.1% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
🔊 » 𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗜𝗣 - 𝗖. 𝗔𝗬𝗨𝗗𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗦 𝗢𝗘𝗣 𝟮𝟲 📢 Publicado el 𝗰𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗮 𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗼 del proceso selectivo del 𝗖𝘂𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗼 𝗱𝗲 𝗔𝘆𝘂𝗱𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗲 Instituciones Penitenciarias (𝗢𝗘𝗣 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲). 🗓️ El 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗲𝗷𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗼 está previsto para el 𝟮𝟱 𝗱𝗲 𝗼𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗯𝗿𝗲 de 2026, a las 9:00 h (hora peninsular) en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid y a las 8:00 h (hora insular) en la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Edificio de Ingenierías). 🩺 El 𝘀𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗼 …
🔊 » 𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗜𝗣 - 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗖𝗜𝗢́𝗡 𝗡𝗢́𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗦 💶 𝗟𝗮𝘀 𝗻𝗼́𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘀 𝗱𝗲 𝗷𝘂𝗹𝗶𝗼 𝘆𝗮 𝘀𝗲 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮́𝗻 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗼, pero desde ACAIP seguimos exigiendo explicaciones y responsabilidades. ✅ Los compañeros nos confirman que el 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗻𝗼 𝗱𝗲 𝗹𝗮 𝗻𝗼́𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮 ya se está materializando en sus cuentas bancarias y que la incidencia parece haber quedado resuelta. 📄 Tras la 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗷𝗮 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 presentada por ACAIP, la Secretaría General de Instituciones Penitenciarias ha tra…
🔊 » 𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗜𝗣 - 𝗡𝗢́𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗦 ✊️ Tras la 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗷𝗮 que registramos a primera hora de esta mañana exigiendo la 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗼́𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗮 del retraso en el abono de las nóminas y la 𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗼́𝗻 𝗱𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗱𝗲𝘀, la Secretaría General de Instituciones Penitenciarias ha remitido una 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗼́𝗻 𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 a todos los directores informando de la incidencia y está realizando gestiones para solucionarla. 💶 Desde 𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗜𝗣 seguimos 𝘃𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘀…
Photo, posted without a caption
🔊 » 𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗜𝗣 - 𝗡𝗢́𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗦 🚨 Desde 𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗜𝗣 hemos presentado una 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗷𝗮 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 ante la Secretaría General de Instituciones Penitenciarias por el 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗻 𝗲𝗹 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗻𝗼 𝗽𝘂𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘀 𝗻𝗼́𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘀 correspondientes al mes de julio. ⚠️ Consideramos 𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 que la Administración justifique este retraso en supuestas incidencias técnicas o problemas de coordinación con el Tesoro Público. Los trabajadores cumplimos cada día con…
🔊 » 𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗜𝗣 - 𝗘𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗣𝗢𝗦 𝗗𝗘 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗖𝗖𝗜𝗢́𝗡 ⛑️ 𝗛𝗼𝘆 𝘀𝗲 𝗵𝗮 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗼 en el BOE la 𝗱𝗼𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗼́𝗻 𝗱𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 para los centros penitenciarios. ⚠️ Desde 𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗜𝗣 denunciamos que esta dotación 𝗻𝗼 𝗰𝘂𝗯𝗿𝗲 las necesidades reales que afrontamos actualmente en los centros penitenciarios. 🦺 Seguimos reclamando 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗰𝗼𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘇𝗼𝘀 adaptados a 𝗰𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗶́𝗮, que garanticen una protección eficaz para toda la plantilla. 🛡️ También exigi…
Video, posted without a caption
🔊 » 𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗜𝗣 - 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗔 🗣 𝗝𝗼𝗮𝗾𝘂𝗶́𝗻 𝗟𝗲𝘆𝘃𝗮, portavoz de ACAIP, responde a las informaciones que cuestionan la actuación de los trabajadores penitenciarios y defiende la realidad que se vive en nuestras prisiones. ⚖️ Desde ACAIP recordamos que los funcionarios penitenciarios 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗺𝗼𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗷𝗼 𝗹𝗮 𝗹𝗲𝘆 𝘆 𝗹𝗼𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗼𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗼𝘀, con todas las actuaciones sometidas al control judicial y administrativo. 🤜🤕 Denunciamos que, en numer…
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2👏1
🔊 » 𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗜𝗣 - 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗗𝗨𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗗 📢 El Consejo de Transparencia ha 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗼́𝗻 y concluye que 𝗹𝗮 𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗼́𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗮́ 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗿 los 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗼𝘀 𝗱𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗼 de la productividad y justificar 𝗽𝗼𝗿 𝗾𝘂𝗲́ 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗼𝘀 𝗽𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗼𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗶𝗯𝗲𝗻 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲. 🔍 Esta 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗼́𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝘂́𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮 para garantizar que la productividad se asigna con 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗼𝘀 𝗼𝗯𝗷𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗼𝘀 y no mediante decisiones arbitrari…
😁1
https://www.elpespunte.es/articulo/sevilla/interno-provoca-incendio-hospital-psiquiatrico-penitenciario-sevilla-obliga-intervencion-maxima-tension/20260720120626141965.html
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @acaipsindicato. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ACAIP TELEGRAM NACIONAL” (@acaipsindicato), 1,258 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/acaipsindicato.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.