Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PENCARI CUAN

Channel

PENCARI CUAN

@abhsagk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,222subscribers

-282 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001884539968
TypeChannel
Username@abhsagk
Created24 June 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/abhsagk

Growth

25,22225,50425,36326 August 2026 — 25,504 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,502 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,471 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,441 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,408 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,363 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,315 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,260 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,222 subscribers26 August 20264 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -282. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,180–25,546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 03:4025,222-38
2 Sept 2026, 16:1725,260-55
1 Sept 2026, 13:2525,315-48
31 Aug 2026, 10:2525,363-45
30 Aug 2026, 11:0825,408-33
29 Aug 2026, 13:0725,441-30
28 Aug 2026, 10:5525,471-31
27 Aug 2026, 11:0425,502-2
26 Aug 2026, 22:3025,504first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 24 June 2023the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 1 post, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1453.8%
😭726.9%
🤨415.4%
🤡13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2023 to 17 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2025, 22:54 UTC≈15,100 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

14😭7🤨4🤡1

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @abhsagk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

OnTop™
@OnTopTM · 455,366
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 15 here — alongside 14 others — read 26 August 2026
Leo | Indonesia – kenalan, bertemu teman baru
@leoindonesia · 844,180
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 26 August 2026
- remaja hijrah
@remaja_hijrahh · 52,549
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PENCARI CUAN” (@abhsagk), 25,222 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abhsagk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.