Channel
@a7_govorit
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
10,649subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002240004383 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @a7_govorit |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/a7_govorit |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
11,200 average views per post against 10,649 subscribers — an engagement rate of 104.8%. Across the 55,140 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,619 subscribers — the middle half sit between 4.19% and 20.1%, with a median of 9.77%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 25 of 25 published in the window (1 exact, 24 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 279,019 |
| Mature posts only | 109.0% over 24 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 10,649 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000 · 55,140 channels · p10 1.60% · p25 4.19% · p50 9.77% · p75 20.1% · p90 36.0% |
| Position in cohort | 99.378th percentile · 10.7× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.274% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 10,649 | +72 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 10,577 | -231 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 10,808 | -93 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 10,901 | +48 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 10,853 | +172 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 10,681 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 10,681 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (16 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 279,019 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @a7_govorit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
агар сизда жиддий ниятлар йўқ бўлса, инсонлар ҳаётига кириб келманг. агар қадрлашни, севишни, ғамхўрлик қилишни билмасангиз, уларни қийнаманг. сиз ўзингизга ўхшаган, фақат фойдаланишни биладиган одамларни топинг. шунда сиз учун ўйин адолатли бўлади.
дуо қилдингми, иккиланма, Аллох аниқ беради деб кут. бермаганда дуо қилдирмас эди. балки бир дуолик масофа қолгандур оша хохлаётган нарсангга. aсло воз кечма!)
жуфт танлаётганда сиз ота-она устоз ва бўлажак фарзандларингизга ўрнак бўладиган намуна танлайсиз. ақлли танлов қилинг. хамма гап хуснда эмас.
эркакнинг рашки хамма аёлга хам насиб қилавермайди... «эркак ўз аёлига тўлиқ ишониши мумкин лекин уни ўраб турган дунёга эмас. агар у хавотир олса, илтимос қилса, асраса бу назорат эмас, йўқотишдан бўлган қўрқув. бу унга нисбатан ишончсизлик эмас, балки ғамхўрлик кўринишидаги севгидир.»
«как говорит Хуршид Расулов»
мен қўнғроқ қилмайман, лекин бефарқ ҳам бўлмайман. ёзмайман, лекин ҳар сафар сени ўйлайман. учрашмайман, лекин барибир соғиниб юраман. сенга бир оғиз ҳам сўз айтмайман, лекин сени доим севиб қоламан)
айрим дардларнинг давоси бир финжон чой устида мароқли суҳбат қуришдир.
Video, posted without a caption
бой одамлар пули билан мақтанмайди. гўзал аёллар эса ўз танасини ҳаммага кўз-кўз қилмайди. ҳақиқий бойлик камтарликда. ҳақиқий гўзаллик кўз-кўз қилмасликда қимматли нарса исботга мухтож эмас.
еркаклар хар доим хам чиройли юзли аёлларни севиб қолишмайди , улар гаплашса кайфияти кўтариладиган , унга далда бўладиган эмоцияга бой аёлларни севиб қолишади , чунки улар билан доим хурсандчиликда юришади.
бир кун хамма нарсанг болади, орзу килганингдан тортип, ният килганингача, хозирча еса сабр)
👩🏻: Боллани орзу-хаваси бўмиди уйин кулгидан бошкасини билишмиди. 🧑🏻: ......
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @a7_govorit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑨𝟕” (@a7_govorit), 10,649 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a7_govorit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.