📝 [HFW] Hello, want to exc-private channel w/ @lRager @qMork @AlexTudner @rJinyoung @heauther @adiozs @kpaus @dislkon @urrubyjenniekilm @MiLLady and @Euvseo. DNI if you're -15, sensitive HW, anti rl thingy, anti NSFW. Drop ur @ and I'll hit you later. 🕸 0 people have voted so far. 📖 Anonymous Board

Channel
Misotheist Scoutz, 1950.
@a56gz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001594622631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @a56gz |
| Description | 📁 t.me/User73629 |
| Created | 30 September 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/a56gz |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 30 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2021 to 25 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📝 [HFW] Hello, want to exc-private channel w/ @lRager @qMork @AlexTudner @rJinyoung @heauther @adiozs @kpaus @dislkon @urrubyjenniekilm @MiLLady and @Euvseo. DNI if you're -15, sensitive HW, anti rl thingy, anti NSFW. Drop ur @ and I'll hit you later. 👤 @qWomanly 👤 @lMilf 👤 @Beautoe nsa 👤 @renjgn nsa 👤 @iMetalicia nsa 👤 @ikann 👤 @MarLbeoro 👤 @kwobeniy nsa 👤 @pdoll 👤 @rsweeaty everyone's allowed! 👤 @Nijngie…
👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
https://open.spotify.com/track/5CgihnZO9To8wj7ALOoTPD?si=5wmpQ5QgQGiHEc2Z0GtuRQ&utm_source=copy-link
Yodeler stomped one who rose, and another then ran away, But the drunk had come around, and glowed red, flush with rage. But Yodeler kept yodeling, and waived the braggart in. Braggart charged, Yodeler swung, catching him on the chin. Three men lay on the floor, the yodeler stepped over them. That night I learned never to cross a true yodeling champion. Not a lesson with much use, that I readily will admit, Much like…
I was in a bar in Texas, in the eastern back-country, with three beers already inside and another draining quickly. It was a perfect redneck bar, the kind of place I love, with sawdust on the floors below and taxidermy up above. A man drank in a corner, wearing a battered hat. he said nothing to no one, and I was thankful for that. For in the center of the bar, a loudmouth proudly raged, boasting of his magnificence,…
⠀⠀ ㅤ ㅤ
Photo, posted without a caption
ㅤ ㅤHoi Polloi re: common folk in sore need of distraction and belief in a brighter side of life, than saliva dehydrating brute nose to the grindstone pathetic existence, yoked as oxen to plows, where plodding tattered shod feet scraped a pencil thin line, whence, seeds sprinkled into futile ruts forecast angry birds to shutterfly, twittering like badass beastie boys bumming. Inn ascent bystanders avian avatars initia…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @a56gz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@adiozs · 12 postsdiskon
@dislkon · 12 posts.
@euvseo · 12 postsJz
@lRager · 12 posts@aktivisi
@aktivisi · 11 postMJ
@caelestines · 11 postJaemin ^__^
@daemin · 21 postKeep
@Domihnan · 11 postdprian
@dpriang · 11 postRajes's Property : RPIN.
@E1193 · 931 postP
@gorgeoust · 51 post୨୧: moiety of the babies, Hanni ♥️
@HannibPham · 11 postkeep eunchae
@hodngeunchae · 21 posthey
@impuritiens · 11 posta.
@izhengguo · 11 post.
@jesol · 31 postjjsomii
@jjsomii · 11 postJordan Poole
@JorddanPoole · 11 postFineline.
@kekashih · 331 post@kuronuma
@kuronumab1 postarchive
@kwobeniy · 11 postEastlyn
@lovewile · 11 postMasculine
@MaswcuLine · 11 postS
@urrubyjenniekilm · 21 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“Misotheist Scoutz, 1950.” (@a56gz). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a56gz.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.