Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Zoroastrian wisdom

@ZoroastrianismWisdom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,537subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001217828040
TypeChannel
Username@ZoroastrianismWisdom
Created25 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZoroastrianismWisdom

Growth

1,5291,5371,5337 August 2026 — 1,530 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,529 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,530 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,537 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,528–1,538 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:451,537+7
10 Aug 2026, 23:051,530+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:341,529-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:311,530first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.4%
avg views ÷ 1,537 subscribers
Avg views / post
314
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,274
Reactions total400
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

400 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21152.8%
🔥11528.7%
🙏389.50%
👏82.00%
🕊82.00%
🥰61.50%
😍51.25%
30.75%
💯20.5%
😭20.5%
👍10.25%
😇10.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 400reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC145 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

druwandān pad ǰumbēnišn ī ān tāg ō dušox ōftēnd. pad se *dar frōd ōftēnd, dar-ē čiyōn tēx ī *spīg [ī] āb-dīdag. pad dušmat, dušhūxt, dušxwaršt ō dušoxšawēnd se rōzag-šabān. (Anklesaria, 1964, p. 161) پس گناهکاران، آن هنگام که چون پلِ چینود به لرزه درآید، از آن فرو افتاده و به دوزخ سقوط کنند. آنان از میان سه درِ هراس‌انگیز، که هر یک چون لبهٔ شمشیری آبدیده و برّان است، به ژرفای دوزخ فرو افتند. این سرنوشتی است که زادهٔ

🙏85🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC137 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥5🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC205 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

u-š pad bun dām, hamāg zamīg pad pāsbānīh be ō *warzāwand ādur ī farrōbay ud tagīg ādur ī gušnasp ud purr-sūd ādur ī burzēn-mihr, čiyōn āsrōn ud artēštār ud wāstaryōš hēnd, abespārd. (Anklesaria, 1964, p. 42) پس دادار اورمزد، در سپیده‌دمِ آفرینش، پاسداریِ سراسرِ گیتی را به سه آتشِ بزرگ و ورجاوند سپرد: آذرفرنبغ، آذرگُشنسب و آذربُرزین‌مهر. هر یک از این آتش‌های سپند، نگاهبانِ یکی از سه بنیادِ اساسیِ زندگیِ اجتماعیِ مرد

🔥96

4 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC159 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

5🔥2🙏1

2 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC304 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ohrmazd dām tanōmandīhā be ō gētīg dād. fradom asmān, dudīgar āb, sidīgar zamīg, čahārom urwar ud panǰom gōspand, šašom mardōm, ud ātaxš andar wisp būd pargandag; hammis pad šaš gōhrag, ī har gōhrag-ē drang ī pad abar dādan and būd, guft ēstēd, čand miǰ-ē ī ka ēk pad did frōd nihēnd. (Anklesaria, 1964, p. 7) پس دادار اورمزد، آفریدگان را که پیش‌تر در جهانِ مینوی زنده بودند، با بخشیدن تن و پیکری مادی، به جهانِ گیتی آو

15🔥4🙏4

1 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC308 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

handāzag ēd ī nimāyīhēd pad dēn kū ān ī kōdak-xrad mardōm xwēš xrad-iš wattom, ēn-iz kū hunsandīh ī pad kōdak-xradīh *parwānag-ē ast ī ō dušox. ēn-iz kū az dušdānāgīh ī az dušāgāhīh frahist mardōm druwand bawēnd [ud] *dušoxīg bē-z kē murd tā nūn bē-z kē mīrēnd az nūn frāz. (Anklesaria, 1964, p. 121) پس در دین چنین گفته شده است: برای آنکس که خردش هنوز کودکانه و نارس است، هیچ چیز زیان‌بارتر از داوریِ خامِ خودِ او نسبت

12🔥5🙏5

1 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC241 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

73🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 04:40 UTC439 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

se tis rāy tuxšišn kunišn, rāmišn ī xwēš ud passand ī wehān ud šnāsišn ī kirbag ud mizd rāy. (Dhabhar, 1930, p.4) انسان باید همواره برای سه چیز بکوشد: نخست، برای آسودگی و شادیِ خویشتن؛ سپس، برای گزینش و خشنودیِ نیکان؛ و سرانجام، برای شناختِ کرفه و پاداشی که از آن امور برمی‌خیزد… «بخشی از متنِ پهلوی اندرز اوشنر دانا» One should always strive for three things: first, the peace and joy of one’s own soul; then, the est

15🔥4🙏4

29 Jul 2026, 04:32 UTC366 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ud ān ī dil mādayān kār, <pad> wād ī ul-āhang ud frōd-āhang [ud] pad ātaxš ī wuzurg tāftan. ī hamāg tanān ǰumbišn-ē ī homānāg az ham zōr. (Anklesaria, 1964, p. 116) پس همانا دل، با هر دَم و بازدَمِ جان‌بخش، آتشِ درون را فروزان و گرم نگاه ‌دارد؛ چراکه جنبشِ همهٔ اندام‌ها، همگی از همین نیرویِ یگانه و هم‌افزا سرچشمه می‌گیرد… (بخشی از متن پهلوی گزیده‌های زادسپرم) Thus, with every life-giving inhalation and exhalation,

20🔥8

28 Jul 2026, 04:33 UTC349 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

čē čiyōn andarōn [ī] asmān āmad, ēg mēnōg asmān artēštār homānāg arwand, kē ayōxšutēn zrēhpaymōxt dārēd, xwad ayōxšustēn asmān *hē, pad burz wāng ud *staft *xrōsišn guft ō ahreman kū: nūn ka andar āmad hē, ā-t abāz nē hilēm. be winird, tā ka ohrmazd pērāmōn asmān any drubuštīh-ē ī saxttar be winārd, *ī ašō-āgāhīhā xwānīhēd. (Anklesaria, 1964, p. 17) پس آن هنگام که اهریمن به درون سپهر راه یافت، مینوی آسمان چون رزم‌آو

🔥1510🥰2😭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ZoroastrianismWisdom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 984,803 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zoroastrian wisdom” (@ZoroastrianismWisdom), 1,537 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZoroastrianismWisdom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.