Channel
@Zlibraryorg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33,196subscribers
+7,677 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001647756209 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zlibraryorg |
| Description | For ads and paid promotion, contact @ZlibAdsBot Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/Zlibraryorg |
| Created | 13 June 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zlibraryorg |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 33,196 | +924 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 32,272 | +760 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 31,512 | +251 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 31,261 | +232 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 31,029 | +203 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 30,826 | +195 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 30,631 | +369 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:02 | 30,262 | +456 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 29,806 | +363 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 29,443 | +210 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:52 | 29,233 | +168 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 29,065 | +173 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 28,892 | +134 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 28,758 | +136 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 28,622 | +101 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 28,521 | +108 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 28,413 | +91 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 28,322 | +50 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 28,272 | +83 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 28,189 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2022 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 June 2022 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 11,400 |
| Reactions total | 95 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Oct 2026, 10:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,188 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 889 | 74.8% | |
| 🔥 | 87 | 7.32% | |
| 👏 | 75 | 6.31% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 2.44% | |
| 💯 | 24 | 2.02% | |
| 🤔 | 23 | 1.94% | |
| 🫡 | 18 | 1.52% | |
| 😁 | 16 | 1.35% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 1.01% | |
| 😎 | 5 | 0.421% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 0.337% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.253% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.168% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.084% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2022 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
It doesn't make sense to continue wanting something if you're not willing to do what it takes to get it. If you don't want to live the lifestyle, then release yourself from the desire. To crave the result but not the process is to guarantee disappointment. - Atomic Habits
❤72🔥13🫡7👏3
"The professional has learned that success, like happiness, comes as a by-product of work. The professional concentrates on the work and allows rewards to come or not come, whatever they like. The amateur spends their time obsessing over the outcome, while the master spends their time inside the process." From The War of Art by Steven Pressfield
❤68👏12🔥6
"We complain that our days are few, yet we act as though they would last forever. We want the wisdom of the philosopher without the hours of reading, and the peace of the monk without the discipline of silence. If you do not change your morning, you cannot expect to change your life." From The Daily Stoic by Ryan Holiday
❤56👏10🔥3
"Remembering that I'll be dead soon is the most important tool I've ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life. Because almost everything—all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure—these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important. Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have so…
❤35💯22👏7🔥5😎5🫡4
"You should be far more concerned with your current trajectory than with your current results. If you want to predict where you will end up in life, all you have to do is follow the curve of your tiny, daily gains or losses, and see how your small choices compound over ten or twenty years." From Atomic Habits by James Clear
❤52🔥7🤝3
"Stop asking the world what it can offer you, and start focusing on what you can offer the world. Passion doesn't produce great work; great work produces passion. Approach your daily routine like a true craftsman, mastering rare and valuable skills, and the lifestyle you want will follow naturally." - From So Good They Can't Ignore You
❤57🔥4
"Who you become is defined by what you’re willing to struggle for. People want an amazing physique, but you don't get it unless you legitimately appreciate the pain and physical stress that comes with living inside a gym for hours upon hours. True desire is measured by what you are willing to suffer for." - The Subtle Art of Not giving a F*ck
❤39🔥7👏5🫡5⚡2
"It won't always go your way, so you can't get trapped in this idea that just because you've imagined a possibility for yourself that you somehow deserve it. Your entitled mind is dead weight. Cut it loose. Don't focus on what you think you deserve. Take aim on what you are willing to earn." – Adapted from Can't Hurt Me by David Goggins
❤33🔥5⚡4👏3🫡2
"There is a profound peace that comes from admitting you don’t want something enough to work for it. It is not an admission of defeat; it is an act of supreme clarity. By releasing an empty ambition, you free up your limited energy to focus on what you are actually willing to sweat for."
❤27⚡2💯2🔥1😍1
"We are all in love with the version of ourselves that has already won. We daydream about the applause, the finished book, the podium, and the wealth. But the reality of achievement is entirely unglamorous. It is a series of mundane, repetitive, and often lonely Tuesdays spent doing things that no one will ever applaud. If you cannot find a way to love those quiet, invisible Tuesdays, then your dream is not a goal—it…
❤32👏13⚡4🆒4
The modern world convinces us that there is a hack for everything—a faster route, a secret strategy, a hidden shortcut to the top. But greatness is stubborn; it refuses to be cheated. The only way to build anything of lasting value is to pay the full price, in full view, every single day. To stare at the mountain and wish you were at the summit without taking the first painful step up the rocky path is the very defi…
❤31👏7🔥1
"Everything comes with an inherent cost. If you want a magnificent body, the price is hunger and sweat. If you want a thriving business, the price is sleepless nights and rejection. When we say we want something, we usually mean we want the reward. But the more important question to ask yourself is, 'What kind of pain am I willing to sustain?' Because if you refuse to choose your struggle, the world will choose it fo…
❤35👏11🔥11
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Zlibraryorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Z Library Official 📚” (@Zlibraryorg), 33,196 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zlibraryorg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.