12 measurements spanning 12 days, net +28,238. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 01:36
29,818
+4,331
3 Sept 2026, 20:57
25,487
-4,027
2 Sept 2026, 11:47
29,514
+17,769
1 Sept 2026, 11:47
11,745
-17,631
31 Aug 2026, 13:28
29,376
+78
30 Aug 2026, 13:25
29,298
+51
29 Aug 2026, 16:11
29,247
+584
28 Aug 2026, 14:48
28,663
+1,549
27 Aug 2026, 12:03
27,114
+7,456
26 Aug 2026, 14:28
19,658
+4,620
25 Aug 2026, 17:48
15,038
+13,458
24 Aug 2026, 23:00
1,580
first reading
Engagement
76 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.0%
avg views ÷ 29,818 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,100
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.626%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 76 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 65 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
76 (3 May 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Views total
668,398
Reactions total
4,183
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 01:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
42
Videos
3
Links
7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,183 reactions across 65 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5796427196268551812
3,775
90.2%
🔥
97
2.32%
👍
87
2.08%
👏
79
1.89%
❤
72
1.72%
⚡
19
0.454%
💯
14
0.335%
👌
12
0.287%
🏆
7
0.167%
🍾
5
0.12%
🌚
2
0.048%
👎
2
0.048%
🤡
2
0.048%
🤬
2
0.048%
✍
1
0.024%
🍌
1
0.024%
🐳
1
0.024%
👻
1
0.024%
🗿
1
0.024%
🤔
1
0.024%
2 further kinds
2
0.048%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 66 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZecZcash. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 76 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 May 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥 ZCASH ORIGINALS #001
THE THREE ENGINES BEHIND ZCASH’S REPRICING
ZEC has crossed $1,000 again — but the price may only be part of the story.
Three major developments are happening simultaneously across the Zcash ecosystem.
1️⃣ CAPITAL MARKETS
Grayscale’s Zcash ETF (ZCSH) began trading on NYSE Arca on August 25.
According to The Block, it recorded at least $34.4M in net inflows through September 4.
For the firs…
🚀 $ZEC JUST HIT $1,200!
Another major milestone for Zcash.
$ZEC briefly pushed above $1,200 on Binance, reaching a 24H high of $1,220 — while gaining nearly 18% in 24 hours.
From $1,000 to $1,200 in just days. 🔥
Privacy is having its moment. 🔒⚡
⚡ $ZEC | #Zcash
🔒 Privacy • Freedom • Financial Sovereignty
🔥 @ZecZcash
🐋 DIAMOND HANDS: ZCASH WHALE TURNS ~$1.1M INTO $23M
One of the most impressive ZEC trades of this cycle just surfaced.
According to on-chain monitoring, a long-term Zcash whale accumulated 22,840 ZEC between 2021 and 2024 at an average price of approximately $48.44 per ZEC.
💰 Estimated cost: ~$1.1 million
🚀 Position value: ~$23.11 million
🔥 Estimated profit: ~$21.96 million
📈 Return: ~20×
After ZEC broke above th…
🕰 SATOSHI WAS THINKING ABOUT ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROOFS IN 2010
On August 11, 2010 — more than six years before Zcash launched — Satoshi Nakamoto discussed zero-knowledge proofs on BitcoinTalk.
He wrote:
“It’s hard to think of how to apply zero-knowledge-proofs in this case.”
At the time, Satoshi was exploring whether advanced cryptography could help verify transactions without requiring everyone to know all of the und…
🏛️ ZCASH HISTORY: EDWARD SNOWDEN WAS THERE FROM THE BEGINNING
For nearly six years, one of the most famous names in the global privacy movement kept a major Zcash secret.
In 2022, Edward Snowden revealed that he had participated in Zcash’s original 2016 trusted setup ceremony — under the pseudonym “John Dobbertin.”
Snowden was one of six participants who helped generate the cryptographic parameters required for Zc…
🎥 CYPHERPUNK CIO: ZCASH COULD REACH 15% OF BITCOIN’S VALUE
Will McEvoy, CIO of publicly traded Cypherpunk Technologies, lays out his long-term thesis for Zcash:
“Zcash takes the best features of Bitcoin — the 21 million hard cap, Proof-of-Work mining and a similar emission schedule — and adds privacy.”
McEvoy believes Zcash could ultimately be valued as high as 15% of Bitcoin.
That view carries weight: Cypherpunk…
🚀 ZCASH BREAKOUT POINTS TO $2,500 LONG-TERM TARGET
Zcash continues to attract attention after its powerful move above the $1,000 level, with a new technical analysis highlighting significantly higher potential for $ZEC.
According to FXEmpire, Zcash has confirmed a breakout from a major ascending triangle pattern that had been developing since March 2026.
📈 Key points from the analysis:
• Major resistance around $6…
custom 579642719626855181283👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @ZecZcash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
When did you first invest in $ZEC?
Let’s see how long the Zcash community has been here. 👇
🔸 2016–201845%
🔸 2019–202010%
🔸 2021–202214%
🔸 2023–202412%
🔸 2025–202622%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
If you were using ZEC for your own transactions, which would you prefer?
🔒 Fully shielded — privacy first34%
⚖️ Both — depending on the situation47%
🔍 Transparent — I don't need privacy11%
🤔 Not sure yet — still learning10%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 6 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zcash (ZEC) | News & Community” (@ZecZcash), 29,818 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZecZcash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.