Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ВÓРОН | 42 МСД

@ZOV_34ru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,654subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001595151492
TypeChannel
Username@ZOV_34ru
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZOV_34ru

Growth

2,6542,6662,6606 August 2026 — 2,666 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,666 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,663 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,654 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,652–2,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:082,654-9
9 Aug 2026, 02:212,663-3
6 Aug 2026, 05:192,666no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:142,666first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 2,654 subscribers
Avg views / post
332
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held23 (15 April 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,658
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29m 06s
Average length
2m 05s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

377 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11731.0%
custom 53011612630977171407118.8%
🫡7018.6%
custom 53008466782181216324411.7%
🙏277.16%
👍153.98%
custom 5330111898178318984133.45%
custom 527419570606678181082.12%
custom 525820379477208585471.86%
👏41.06%
custom 543617246053584923710.265%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 439reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 23 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZOV_34ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC326 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥8🫡5👍4custom 53011612630977171402

6 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC228 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ровно 111 лет назад - 6 августа 1915 года наши прадеды совершили героический подвиг. Это солдаты 226го Землянского полка. 111 лет назад, при штурме крепости Осовец, немцами был применен газ против войск Российской Империи. У Русских не было противогазов и единственное, что они могли, это намотать на лица мокрые тряпки. В результате химической атаки, ещё до боя из строя выбыло несколько тысяч человек и в окопах остало

🫡5🔥2🙏2custom 52741957060667818101

29 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC432 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ZS42MSDVideo

Колёса врага долго не крутятся, если за дело берётся «Гид». Дроновод роты БпС «Ворон» 42-й гвардейской дивизии превратил охоту на вражескую технику в свою личную специализацию. Автомобили, НРТК и прочая колёсная братия попадают под раздачу без права на второй круг. Птичка взлетела, цель найдена, удар нанесён. Всё, приехали! 📱 Стальная Сорок Вторая 📱 ВКонтакте 📲 MAX

🔥9custom 53008466782181216325custom 52582037947720858543custom 53301118981783189841

28 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC470 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @otryadkovpakaVideo

#Эпизод33 Партизаны и подпольщики Отряда Ковпака продолжают свой ратный труд На этот раз уничтожен🔥 релейный шкаф в Ровенской области (идейные наследники Николая Кузнецова из Ровно просто жгут и одни из самых результативных), в результате чего на несколько часов были прерваны железнодорожные перевозки нацистов, нарушена военная логистика. ❗️Партизаны и подпольщики на территориях, подконтрольных киевскому режиму ест

custom 53011612630977171402

20 Jun 2026, 12:37 UTC≈1,030 views21 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Неприятная атака украинских нацистов на Москву обнажила важную проблему — нехватку ППО. Несмотря на то, что публично мы всегда декларируем, что тыл у нас защищён надёжно, кажется, пора пришла признать, что проблема всё-таки есть. И на фронте, и в тылу, и уже в глубоком тылу. Мы могли не наблюдать прилёт за прилётом, если бы было достаточно средств малой ППО. Тех же Ёлок. Где наши дроны-перехватчики? На видео с мес

custom 530116126309771714012🔥4custom 52582037947720858544👍1

9 Jun 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,210 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ЗАПОРОЖСКИЙ ФРОНТ | ОРЕХОВСКОЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЕ 💬 ВÓРОН | 42 МСД 👁 💬 Стальная Сорок Вторая

custom 53301118981783189846👍3🔥2custom 54361724605358492371

8 Jun 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,320 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Три года назад начался "контрнаступ" ВСУ на Запорожье... «Сегодня в два часа ночи, ровно три года назад началось Запорожское сражение. Вечная память павшим в боях за Родину. Вечная слава живым! Россия проиграла бы войну. Погибли бы тысячи людей. Враг был бы в Крыму. Они вышли бы к Азовскому морю, перерезали сухопутный коридор в Крым. Окружили бы огромную ГВ наших, в том числе ГВ Днепр. И одновременным уничтожен

🫡20🙏5👏4custom 52741957060667818102custom 53008466782181216321

2 Jun 2026, 09:27 UTC≈3,090 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ЗАПОРОЖСКИЙ ФРОНТ | ОРЕХОВСКОЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЕ Сожгли тут малость техники 👀 💬 ВÓРОН | 42 МСД 👁 💬 Стальная Сорок Вторая

🔥14custom 53008466782181216324custom 53011612630977171403custom 53301118981783189842

1 Jun 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,170 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥6🙏6🫡3👍2custom 53301118981783189841

31 May 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,130 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если за сутки наберем определенную сумму , выложу видео где Укропа разрывает на части в деталях 🫡 Газ товарищи 😁 Участникам подпишем каждый боеприпас в лс , для личного пользования с видео 💪

🙏4

30 May 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,550 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем доброго времени суток 🫡 Встал двигатель на автомобиле который выполняет важнейшую роль в нашей работе , собрали на ремонт только 116 932рубля, а нужно 250 т.р. Дорогие подписчики, просим вашей помощи, срочно 🚨 СБЕРБАНК 2202 2010 7594 1258

🙏8🫡4custom 53011612630977171403custom 53008466782181216322

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @ZOV_34ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 604,157 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ВÓРОН | 42 МСД” (@ZOV_34ru), 2,654 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZOV_34ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.