Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for زعـ ـيـ ـم الـمـ ـجـال | 𝚉𝙰𝙴𝙼 𝙴𝚌𝚕𝚒𝚙𝚜𝚎

Channel

زعـ ـيـ ـم الـمـ ـجـال | 𝚉𝙰𝙴𝙼 𝙴𝚌𝚕𝚒𝚙𝚜𝚎

@ZAEM_ECLIPSE

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,882subscribers

+1,075 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002632631180
TypeChannel
Username@ZAEM_ECLIPSE
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZAEM_ECLIPSE

Growth

4,8075,9855,3967 August 2026 — 4,807 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,940 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,212 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,556 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,676 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,764 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,933 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,976 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,985 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,957 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,882 subscribers5,8827 August 20268 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1,075. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,630–6,162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 12:195,882-75
2 Sept 2026, 23:585,957-28
31 Aug 2026, 00:255,985+9
27 Aug 2026, 17:335,976+43
24 Aug 2026, 09:235,933+169
20 Aug 2026, 22:275,764+88
17 Aug 2026, 19:535,676+120
14 Aug 2026, 19:175,556+344
11 Aug 2026, 11:575,212+272
8 Aug 2026, 18:534,940+133
7 Aug 2026, 19:024,807first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

477 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30864.6%
😁5411.3%
🔥387.97%
183.77%
🤯102.10%
🥰102.10%
👏81.68%
💘81.68%
😍51.05%
😎51.05%
😘51.05%
❤‍🔥30.629%
🙈30.629%
😨20.419%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 477 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC840 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

متوفر 2 اكات تليجرام مزيف مش محظورين هندي مزيف انشاء 2024 (@akanmma) فيتنام مزيف انشاء 2024 (@N36982) لتواصل @zaem_s1

2

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

30 Jul 2026, 01:19 UTC≈2,890 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ياريت من كل اخواتي تخش تسيب كومنت حلو اثبات الثغره ولايك واشتراك مش هتخسر حاجه https://youtu.be/81u7f8EgGbE?si=zOrtkaaJ_QfaF-rm قدروني عشان هنزلكم الجديد علطول

19🔥1

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

28 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC≈2,490 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

لايكات وتعليقات الفديو واقعه خالص حرام عليكو والله

21🥰2

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

28 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC≈2,260 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ان شاء الله خلال ساعات كل بيت فيه ثانويه عامه هيفرح وربنا هيجبر بخاطرهم ❤️❤️ ادعوا لهم بالله عليكم ربنا يفرح قلوبهم🤲🤲

44💘7

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

28 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC≈2,380 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ده الشرموط ابن الاحبه عراقي بيقول اني انا سارقها كسمك بجد عيل اهطل كان في قناتي سرق الثغره وكل حاجة وحولها من قناتي لقناته وطردت كسمك زي الكلب وبقولهالك من نص قناتي يكسمك ان عيل ديوث وحرامي وهتفضل ابن ديوثه اشكال بنت عرص

😁365❤‍🔥1

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

28 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC≈1,980 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

الثغره اتسرقت واتوزعت علي بتوع اليمن وبتتباع خخخ

😁117🤯2😨2

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

27 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTC≈2,120 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

اشوف اعملكم ثغرة قنوات مزيف او احتيال؟؟!

  1. اه89%
  2. لا14%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14🔥2

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

26 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC≈1,950 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

الي يقلب من الثغره يسيب كومنت حلو لثغره علي اليوتيوب

17🥰3

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

26 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC≈3,300 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

رابط الشرح https://youtu.be/81u7f8EgGbE?si=zOrtkaaJ_QfaF-rm الحق اقلب اكونتك

4

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

26 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC≈2,440 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

عاااااااش يجلبي

6🔥5🥰3

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

25 Jul 2026, 21:08 UTC≈1,720 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

عايز كام واحد يساهم في ايميلات بباسورد التطبيق زي الي في الشرح ونضيفهم في البوت واعمل بوت جديد تبعت اليوزر الحساب للبوت بس وهو ييشد @Zaem_S1

14🔥6

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

25 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC≈1,940 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

شكلكم مش عارفين تستخدمو بوت الشد لو كده شدو يدوي من الايميل او اعملكم بوت شد علي الحسابات مجرد تبعت يوزر الحساب بس / بس هحتاج ايميلات كتير عشان اضيفها في البوت

12👏4❤‍🔥2

Signed 𝑨𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒁𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝑬𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒆

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ZAEM_ECLIPSE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTCAnonymous Poll169 voters

اشوف اعملكم ثغرة قنوات مزيف او احتيال؟؟!

  1. اه89%
  2. لا14%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“زعـ ـيـ ـم الـمـ ـجـال | 𝚉𝙰𝙴𝙼 𝙴𝚌𝚕𝚒𝚙𝚜𝚎” (@ZAEM_ECLIPSE), 5,882 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZAEM_ECLIPSE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.