Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,404–3,474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 18:37
3,412
-2
14 Sept 2026, 14:17
3,414
+1
10 Sept 2026, 14:59
3,413
-8
5 Sept 2026, 08:00
3,421
-4
1 Sept 2026, 11:55
3,425
-15
29 Aug 2026, 18:42
3,440
-7
26 Aug 2026, 23:37
3,447
+8
24 Aug 2026, 01:38
3,439
-27
20 Aug 2026, 06:16
3,466
+11
17 Aug 2026, 09:48
3,455
+24
13 Aug 2026, 11:13
3,431
+10
10 Aug 2026, 17:08
3,421
+4
7 Aug 2026, 22:06
3,417
-3
7 Aug 2026, 13:18
3,420
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:50
3,420
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 58s
Average length
1m 19s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
50 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
21
42.0%
👍
20
40.0%
👌
5
10.0%
🤩
2
4.00%
👏
1
2.00%
💯
1
2.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ ИНТЕРНЕТНИ ЛАРЗАГА СОЛГАН ВИДЕО! СИЗ ҲАМ КЎРДИНГИЗМИ?
💬 Сиз бу ҳолат ҳақида қандай фикрдасиз? Изоҳда ёзиб қолдиринг.
📲 Фойдали деб ҳисобласангиз, ушбу видеони камида битта дўстингизга юборинг — улар ҳам қонунни билиб юришсин!
https://t.me/Yuridik_Maslahat24
#фойдали_малумот
⚠️ ПАСПОРТ НУСХАСИНИ БЕРИШ ҚАНЧАЛИК ХАВФЛИ?
Кўпчилик паспорт нусхасини бемалол Telegram орқали ёки нотаниш шахсларга юбориб қўяди. Аслида эса бу жиддий хавфларга сабаб бўлиши мумкин.
Паспорт нусхаси қандай мақсадларда суиистеъмол қилиниши мумкин?
✅ Сизнинг номингизга онлайн микрокредит ёки қарз расмийлаштиришга уриниш.
✅ Сиз ҳақингизда сохта шартномалар ёки аризалар тайёрлаш.
✅ Турли онлайн платфо…
#Оммавий_оферта
📢 РАСМИЙ ЭЪЛОН
Ҳурматли фуқаролар ва мижозлар!
«YURIST KONSUL KONSALTING» хусусий корхонаси томонидан тасдиқланган № YKK-OF-01/2026-сонли "Ҳуқуқий хизмат кўрсатиш тўғрисидаги Оммавий оферта шартномаси" расман эълон қилинади.
📅 2026 йил 7 августдан бошлаб мазкур Оммавий оферта кучга кирган ҳисобланади.
Ушбу Оммавий оферта:
⚖️ юридик маслаҳат бериш;
📄 ҳуқуқий ҳужжатлар тайёрлаш;
💻 онлайн ва офлайн …
⚖️ ALIMENTDAN VOZ KECHISH EVAZIGA UY TALAB QILSA BO‘LADIMI?
Ko‘pchilik o‘ylaydi: "Alimentdan voz kechsam, evaziga uy yoki boshqa mol-mulkni olsam bo‘ladimi?"
❗️ Bu masalada qonunchilik nimani belgilaydi?
❗️ Qanday kelishuv qonuniy hisoblanadi?
❗️ Qaysi holatlarda bunday kelishuv haqiqiy bo‘lmaydi?
Batafsil javobni videoda ko‘ring:
🎥 https://youtu.be/bJADclT2G4o
##
❓СИЗНИ ҲОЗИР ЭНГ КЎП ҚАЙСИ ҲУҚУҚИЙ МАСАЛА ҚИЙНАЯПТИ?
💬 ИЗОҲЛАРДА ЁЗИБ ҚОЛДИРИНГ! ИМКОН ҚАДАР ҲАР БИР САВОЛГА ҲУҚУҚИЙ ЖИҲАТДАН АНИҚ ВА АСОСЛИ ЖАВОБ БЕРИБ ЎТАМИЗ. ⚖️
Каналимизга уланиш учун👇
https://t.me/Yuridik_Maslahat24
t.me/Yuristgasavolberish
ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ
#фойдали_малумот
⚖️ ЭР-ХОТИН ЗАГССИЗ ЯШАГАН БЎЛСА, МОЛ-МУЛККА ҲАҚЛИМИ?
Кўпчилик фақат шаръий никоҳ билан яшаса ҳам, қонун олдида эр-хотин ҳисобланаман, деб ўйлайди. Аммо қонунчиликка кўра, никоҳ ФҲДЁ органида давлат рўйхатидан ўтказилганидан кейингина эр-хотинлик ҳуқуқ ва мажбуриятлари вужудга келади.
❗️Шу сабабли ЗАГСсиз яшаган аёл ёки эр:
— иккинчи томон номига расмийлаштирилган мол-мулкнинг автоматик равишда ярм…
https://youtu.be/5NNq-x73zVo
⚖️ Саволингиз бўлса, изоҳда қолдиринг. Барчасига жавоб берамиз.
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Yuridik_Maslahat24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❓ Жиноят кодексига мувофиқ, неча ёшдан шахс жиноий жавобгарликка тортилиши мумкин?
Жиноят содир этгунга қадар ўн тўққиз ёшга тўлган шахслар36%
Жиноят содир этгунга қадар ўн икки ёшга тўлган шахслар16%
Жиноят содир этгунга қадар ўн беш ёшга тўлган шахслар17%
Жиноят содир этгунга қадар ўн тўрт ёшга тўлган шахслар30%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yuridik Maslahat-24. “YURIST KONSUL” — юридик хизматларни кўрсатиш маркази.” (@Yuridik_Maslahat24), 3,412 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yuridik_Maslahat24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.