Posted without readable text

Channel
亿万富豪养成计划
@YWFHYCJH
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
3,308subscribers
+50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002621341454 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YWFHYCJH |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YWFHYCJH |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 3,308 | +25 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 3,283 | -6 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 3,289 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 3,288 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 3,291 | +6 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 3,285 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:23 | 3,288 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 3,283 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 3,280 | +19 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 3,261 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 3,262 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 3,259 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 3,262 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 3,260 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 3,257 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 3,258 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 3,258 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 53.1% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 18.8% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 12.5% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
至于为什么空以太坊…… 似乎要说的话,在一年半前就说过一次。 以太坊是散户的末日战车,不是只有你一个人认为“以太坊比垃圾山寨稳,涨幅又比比特币大……” 有这个想法的人太多太多了…… 最底层的逻辑是,只有极少数人可以在金融市场赚钱,绝大部分人亏钱,少部分人不亏不赚。 管他什么叙事什么逻辑什么梦想,钱就只有那么多,你是庄家你怎么分蛋糕? 答案很简单,没收市场绝大多数人的资产就行了。 没收方式呢? 猎杀本能。 本能反应都是错的,克服本能,利用本能,逆本能。
❤6
7.11日凌晨,ETH1571位置平掉上轮1842空单 7.11日早晨,开出BTC57825多单 7.15日晚,开出ETH1940空单 开仓逻辑分享。 但聪明人会把我每一单的开仓位置,放大到1分钟级别图表去研究。 比特币57K的开单逻辑在于,比特币当时连续几天在58K附近盘整,但下方已经没有多少流动性可以扫了,只要跌破平行底部,那就是上涨的起点。 以太坊在1946的顶部也同样如此,1分钟图表第一次到达1946后,清算地图的上方其实在1955的位置有一千多万的止损可以打掉的,但太少,他不一定上去,爆冲或者不爆冲的区别,结果没有爆冲。没有爆冲就是直接空 多空两张单子都不会手动平仓了。 接下来的熊底多单,我等了4年,未来会至少拿4年。 这大半年做空赚了很多,但我才是比特币和以太坊最彻底的信仰者。 做多只是喜欢,做空才是爱。 喜欢就会放肆,爱是克制
💯6❤1
2026年上半年股票操作复盘之NVO: 1、2025年7月31日诺和诺德NVO暴跌开始关注,2026年3月27日才开仓买入NVO 2、观察了8个月之久,期间几次反弹都没有上车。 3、没有在2号位置也就是去年8月的这波反弹上车,是因为跌幅过深,反弹到1号下降压制线的时候,非常容易力竭而亡,无法长拿,如果是短线,入场点位又并不可靠,同时当时市场环境,AI和加密如火如荼,老登药王NVO抢钱是抢不过的。 4、3号黄线箭头是我们的入场点位和时间,参考依据是4号历史强支撑位A,并且放大来看,入场位置博的是一个W底,同时很贴近1号压制线,如果突破,一定是一鼓作气的势能。再加上如图所示的一些股息和PE相关数据,就上了 5、当时的备案是,如果继续下跌,会在5号蓝色横线位置加仓,同样是历史强支撑,虽然未能跌到5号位置,但安置好了不少资金在安全可靠的位置。 6、NVO未来涨跌暂不做分析,仅分享开仓逻辑。
😁4
市场永远是错的 尽量去预测市场,而不是跟随市场
❤1
ZEC这种熊市末期黑天鹅暴跌龙头币的针尖多单,确实没有一个可以参考的平仓价格,相对应的是可以慢慢吃一点资金费率,传家单了
纳斯达克指数跌到18000点附近开始抄底
❤6🤣3
AI不会察言观色,它只会听话照做。 听话照做让你觉得他厉害 察言观色让你觉得你厉害
做了个梦 意识到对于未来的感觉和判断是AI无论如何无法做到的。 AI可以基于已知信息给出最完整的分析和概率答案,但无法预判人性参与以后的巨大耦合性导向。 东方的文化属性会在最终的AI世界获得胜利
❤3👍2
先投爱迪生还是特斯拉?
- 1.先投爱迪生再投特斯拉48%
- 2.先投特斯拉再投爱迪生8%
- 3.2013年的时候投特斯拉😁49%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
之前聊到过,看空AI的资本市场不等于看空AI整体技术 技术好也不等于股价涨。 这中间最关键的充要条件就是人性。 将AI革命与一百多年前的电力革命做类比,并不过分。 通过AI的能力让生产力跃迁式的提升需要结构性的改变,时髦点的说法叫:范式转移。 但达成这个目标并不容易,拿智能驾驶举例,L3级别的自动驾驶尚且未能大面积普及,更别提其他所有领域的智能化了。 不是说他不会变,只是说他变得不会那么快。 科技大佬每天都在说,AI的进步有多快,大家都看得到。 但记得我们上面说的吗,技术强不等于股价涨。 就像学习好不等于能发财 是一个道理 更何况在同级别的方向选择上,也并非一蹴而就的: 交流电OR直流电? 最初不也是爱迪生把科学家特斯拉压制的死死的。 现在呢,GPU、ASIC、光芯片还有量子,你觉得哪个是未来呢? 谁来发电? 从煤电,水电,天然气,核电,风电,太阳能,电力革命也同样伴随着基建环节的变迁。 中央电网还是分布式? 那不是…
你在存储上赚到钱了吗
- 1.长线玩家一直浮盈9%
- 2.赚到之后再没回去9%
- 3.赚过又亏回去了19%
- 4.被套了13%
- 5.没碰过54%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @YWFHYCJH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
先投爱迪生还是特斯拉?
- 1.先投爱迪生再投特斯拉48%
- 2.先投特斯拉再投爱迪生8%
- 3.2013年的时候投特斯拉😁49%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
你在存储上赚到钱了吗
- 1.长线玩家一直浮盈9%
- 2.赚到之后再没回去9%
- 3.赚过又亏回去了19%
- 4.被套了13%
- 5.没碰过54%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 18 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“亿万富豪养成计划” (@YWFHYCJH), 3,308 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YWFHYCJH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.