英国实卡有货,需要接码 联系: @YOYOv_v

Channel
YOYO全球实卡,蓝标,Line
@YOYv_v
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,988subscribers
+2,470 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003883437797 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YOYv_v |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 7 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YOYv_v |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@YOYv_v was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 17 August 2026 – 17 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 3,988 | +2,704 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 1,284 | -130 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 1,414 | -101 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 1,515 | -5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 1,520 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:47 | 1,520 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 1,521 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 1,519 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 1,518 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 1,518 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.176%
- avg views ÷ 3,988 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (7 July 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 7 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
60 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 19 | 31.7% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 30.0% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 26.7% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
韩国货源已备齐 韩国BAND,Kakao📱,Line📱有货管饱 Band这个是韩版贴吧。 联系客服: @H_olls
泰国LINE 韩国LINE 香港LINE 日本LINE带绑脱绑 台湾LINE带绑脱绑 韩国黑卡接kakao 各国实卡接码:tg-ws- LINE 大量到卡大量有货 联系客服: @H_olls
做马来盘的可以提前找我囤货了!!!!实名之后依旧有卡 @H_olls 马来西亚资讯:严查电话卡“集中实名登记”:疑流入诈骗集团,通讯部长要求电信CEO限时解释 马来西亚政府开始严查电话卡,被大量集中实名登记的问题,并担忧这些号码最终可能被网络诈骗集团利用。 据《Malay Mail》8月20日报道,马来西亚通讯部长法米(Fahmi Fadzil)今天表示,政府已经注意到有关大量电话号码被登记在个别人士身份名下的情况。 法米指出,如果相关情况属实,涉及的电信公司必须作出解释。 他表示,通讯部将召见有关电信公司,并要求相关公司的首席执行官(CEO)在今天结束前提供完整说明。 此次问题受到关注的一个重要原因,就是这些大量注册的电话号码存在被滥用于网络诈骗活动的风险。 网络诈骗集团往往需要大量电话号码,用于注册通讯软件账号、联系受害者或进行其他诈骗活动。如果实名登记制度出现漏洞,甚至允许单一身份异常注册大量号码,就可能增加电话卡被非…
kakao到货低价出售 客服:@H_olls
蓝标稳定出号中😀 可接(全球!)蓝标定制,ws官方企业认证,增加账号权重与客户信任度。 联系客服: @H_olls
📱📱📱📱 蓝标全球可定制咯😀 Meta Verified入口号直开😀 全球稳定出号中😀 联系客服:@H_olls
要实卡和老号的可以d咯(整理了一晚上)
📱📱📱📱📱 WS蓝标风控解除目前支持定制(全球) 1.提升信任度:在诈骗信息泛滥的环境下,蓝标能让客户一眼识别官方身份,大幅减少戒备心。 2.优化展示效果:即使客户未将您的号码存入通讯录,聊天列表中也会直接显示您的企业名称而非纯数字电话。 3.提高转化率:带有蓝标的商业账号通常能获得更高的消息开启率和回复率。 联系客服: @H_olls
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 接全球蓝标WhatsApp定制的,价格跟我一样美丽联系客服: @H_olls
日本Line📱 泰国Line📱 香港Line📱 韩国Line📱 台湾Line📱 可定制Line Works企业line (日本过七天企业Line)库存充足!!! 🤩虽是酷暑,但我价格依旧冰点🤩 联系客服: @VIP_808808
📱📱📱📱📱 我说我现货库存很多LINE,你说我贷款出海做老赖 联系客服: @H_olls
👍2🤣2👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @YOYv_v. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YOYO全球实卡,蓝标,Line” (@YOYv_v), 3,988 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YOYv_v.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.