📱三角洲无视加密内核📱 😛纯读取坐标无视任何加密😝 😁不动任何游戏内存,动了死全家,只读取😁 😃可自动跑刀系统层级触控,可云手机运行 😃 并可以跨系统进程内核只有在后台内核悬浮窗就不会消失,支持安卓9-16 内置大量4系5系6系驱动 (免root) 无视加密 直接读取真实坐标 不用隐藏任何环境 无遁地 无闪框 不是直装 不是框架 不是装载机 是真正意义上的跨系统级内核 内核 脚本是系统级层面的调用的Google开源的安卓13+ 以上版本的API接口 官方频道:@JZWM1 官方频道:@JZWM1 官方频道:@JZWM1 官方频道:@JZWM1 采用的原生Kotlin语言开发 领取svip领取svip领取svip领取svip 领取svip领取svip领取svip领取svip 领取svip领取svip领取svip领取svip 领取svip领取svip领取svip领取svip

Channel
肄君全防主频道🇨🇳
@YJNP6I
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,236subscribers
-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001937643199 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YJNP6I |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YJNP6I |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 2,236 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 2,247 | -11 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 2,258 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 2,276 | -30 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 2,306 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 2,311 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 2,311 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 May 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.358%
- avg views ÷ 2,236 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 May 2024 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 54s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
158 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 80 | 50.6% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 15.2% | |
| 🍌 | 19 | 12.0% | |
| 🌭 | 9 | 5.70% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 4.43% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 3.16% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 3.16% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 1.90% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.633% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.633% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2024 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
❗️❗️soso搜索资源群 💇 🌜🌜🌜 👓频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 😆加入即可搜索😁 https://t.me/+AKil6rXPKQQ2MTU1 https://t.me/+AKil6rXPKQQ2MTU1 免费开户 千元红包 免费数据号 公益内核 破解美化 免费看篇 八卦吃瓜 抖音热搜…… 点击下方按钮加入😃
赛罗端口新版安装包 请及时更换 2.0版本作废 下载链接https://www.123pan.com/s/m2IVVv-u6Ir3.html
👍19🤬5❤2😡2🥰1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
提卡链接 提卡链接 https://yjnp6.adbn.top
👍11❤7😁6👎2
赛罗端口反馈 稳定大号
👍3❤1
每把20杀以上谁的一辈子😊😊😍
❤3
赛罗端口39杀吃鸡
👍2
赛罗端口浏览器验证不上的 第一,允许列表没有挂浏览器 第二,账号密码填错了 点我查看使用教程
👍4❤2😁1
赛罗端口使用教程😡 再不会用直接剁吊吧
❤4👍3
没开😁#赛罗端口
你玩端口打一个人禁网10分钟 解封之后又发现是被隔离了 账号实名黑的问题所以才导致的
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @YJNP6I. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@YJNP6I named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“肄君全防主频道🇨🇳” (@YJNP6I), 2,236 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YJNP6I.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.