Channel
@XYHLPD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,676subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002020284338 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XYHLPD |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XYHLPD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 6,676 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 6,677 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,387 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
星河娱乐彩金红包！累计充值1500RMB即可领取！ 仅限电子流水下分不限红！星河官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @XYHLPD 点击领取🧧流水夺宝 @XHYK_bot最高奖励999999U🧧🧧🧧 🧧星河 宝宝发送了一个红包 💴总金额: 18888.00 CNY,剩余:64/66 💳 领取门槛: 累计充值满 1500 RMB 📝 备注: okpay暂停充值先 请使用USDT进行充值 欢迎各位老板爆大奖 🔐 验证码: 2478 🥇吴杰 +364.73 CNY💴 🥈听风 出 NFT +276.75 CNY💴
星河娱乐彩金红包！累计充值1500RMB即可领取！ 仅限电子流水下分不限红！星河官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @XYHLPD 点击领取🧧流水夺宝 @XHYK_bot最高奖励999999U🧧🧧🧧 🧧星河 宝宝发送了一个红包 💴总金额: 18888.00 CNY,剩余:62/66 💳 领取门槛: 累计充值满 1500 RMB 📝 备注: okpay暂停充值先 请使用USDT进行充值 欢迎各位老板爆大奖 🔐 验证码: 4753 🥇启萌 +319.76 CNY💴 🥈小雅 +315.82 CNY💴 🥉雪儿 +309.09 CNY💴 🧧听风 出 NFT +264.26 CNY💴
星河娱乐彩金红包！累计充值1500RMB即可领取！ 仅限电子流水下分不限红！星河官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @XYHLPD 点击领取🧧流水夺宝 @XHYK_bot最高奖励999999U🧧🧧🧧 🧧如初发送了一个红包 💴总金额: 18888.00 CNY,剩余:85/88 💰 流水红包: 3.00倍 💳 领取门槛: 累计充值满 1500 RMB 📝 备注: 😂😂okpay暂停充值先 请使用USDT进行充值 欢迎各位老板爆大奖😂😂 😂😂 如何解忧，唯有暴富😂😂 💸💸发财不迷路，星河电子能暴富💸💸 🔐 验证码: 3107 🥇吴杰 +215.70 CNY💴 🥈启萌 +170.92 CNY💴 🥉听风 出 NFT +155.94 CNY💴
星河娱乐彩金红包！累计充值1500RMB即可领取！ 仅限电子流水下分不限红！星河官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @XYHLPD 点击领取🧧流水夺宝 @XHYK_bot最高奖励999999U🧧🧧🧧 🧧星河 宝宝发送了一个红包 💴总金额: 80000.00 CNY,剩余:186/188 💰 流水红包: 3.00倍 💳 领取门槛: 累计充值满 1500 RMB 🔐 验证码: 5130 🥇雪儿 +320.34 CNY💴 🥈听风 出 NFT +298.27 CNY💴
星河娱乐彩金红包！累计充值500RMB即可领取！ 仅限电子流水下分不限红！星河官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @XYHLPD 点击领取🧧流水夺宝 @XHYK_bot最高奖励999999U🧧🧧🧧 🧧星河 宝宝发送了一个红包 💴总金额: 5888.00 CNY,剩余:84/88 💰 流水红包: 5.00倍 💳 领取门槛: 累计充值满 500 RMB 🔐 验证码: 2811 🥇小雅 +86.00 CNY💴 🥈微信工作室 +82.72 CNY💴 🥉吴杰 +73.08 CNY💴 🧧嘻嘻 +47.20 CNY💴
星河娱乐彩金红包！累计充值3000RMB即可领取！ 仅限电子流水下分不限红！星河官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @XYHLPD 点击领取🧧流水夺宝 @XHYK_bot最高奖励999999U🧧🧧🧧 🧧星河 宝宝发送了一个红包 💴总金额: 18888.00 CNY,剩余:84/88 💰 流水红包: 5.00倍 💳 领取门槛: 累计充值满 3000 RMB 🔐 验证码: 5408 🥇心心 +240.64 CNY💴 🥈微信工作室 +223.78 CNY💴 🥉嘻嘻 +167.33 CNY💴 🧧吴杰 +156.32 CNY💴
👑恭喜会员木木充值500u提款2160u，祝老板在星河娱乐天天爆大奖 👑 历史由赢家书写，而屏幕此刻为你加冕 💪 看准时机，一注封神， 👑星河爆奖瞬间，远胜十年征程。 📢 星河PG电子频道： @XHYLRS 📢 星河PG官方客服： @XHYLBB 📢 星河pg游戏中心： @XHYK_bot
👑恭喜会员天涯充值1000u提款5344u，祝老板在星河娱乐天天爆大奖 👑恭喜会员天涯在宝石旷工中多次中大奖，祝老板在星河pg电子娱乐城，天天爆大奖 👑 历史由赢家书写，而屏幕此刻为你加冕 💪 看准时机，一注封神， 👑星河爆奖瞬间，远胜十年征程。 📢 星河PG电子频道： @XHYLRS 📢 星河PG官方客服： @XHYLBB 📢 星河pg游戏中心： @XHYK_bot
👑恭喜会员汤臣****充值25000U总喜提77999u，祝老板在 星河娱乐天天爆大奖 👑恭喜会员汤臣**** 在《麻将糊了》中多次拉中大奖，祝老板在 星河pg电子娱乐城，天天爆大奖 👑 历史由赢家书写，而屏幕此刻为你加冕 💪 看准时机，一注封神， 👑 星河爆奖瞬间，远胜十年征程。 📢 星河PG电子频道： @XHYLRS 📢 星河PG官方客服： @XHYLBB 📢 星河pg游戏中心： @XHYK_bot
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @XYHLPD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 312,830 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“星河娱乐全网上押100万美金” (@XYHLPD), 6,676 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XYHLPD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.