Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Whale Tale 🐋

Channel

Whale Tale 🐋

@Whale_Tale

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,324subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002091811690
TypeChannel
Username@Whale_Tale
DescriptionRide crypto waves with Whale Tale! Jokes @DegenMemeWorld Collaboration @alevob #bitcoin #ethereum #altcoin #ton #not #toncoin #notcoin #blockchain #memecoin #defi #nft #play2earn #crypto #money #airdrop #bullrun #airdrop #money #hamster #blum #memefi
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 September 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Whale_Tale

Growth

3,3247 Sept 2026, 16:47 — 3,324 subscribers7 Sept 2026, 17:22 — 3,324 subscribers7 Sept 2026, 16:477 Sept 2026, 17:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,321–3,327 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 17:223,324no change
7 Sept 2026, 16:473,324first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.596%
avg views ÷ 3,324 subscribers
Avg views / post
19.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held20 (26 August 20267 September 2026)
Views total396
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,110
Videos
93
Links
756

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC5 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

$ONDO is printing a big Symmetrical Triangle on the 3D chart 🧐 If $BTC behaves $ONDO could break out very soon 📈 Use the MA50 to manage the risk

6 Sept 2026, 20:25 UTC8 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

My opinion on $TAO #Bittensor I really like this 900-Day Chopsolidation. When #TAO breaks out it will be massive 🚀 🎯 My $TAO targets for 2027-2029 would be: $1230 & $2200

6 Sept 2026, 11:10 UTC9 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Recently I was asked if $LTC could reach a $30B market cap in 2027-2029 I think it's possible. I believe #Litecoin market cap will have to touch that Resistance line at some point. So my Target would be $36-43B, which is approximately $460-550 for 1 $LTC 📍

4 Sept 2026, 18:14 UTC15 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Pay attention to $XMR here 👀 It can be a real breakout this time. August had the highest monthly close ever $2k for 1 $XMR is just a matter of time 😉

4 Sept 2026, 13:25 UTC17 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

$SUI 1W line chart Looks like $SUI is ready to break out of this giant 500-Day Falling Wedge 👀 📈 Hey $SUI holders, are you ready? 😏

3 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC20 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

$OTHERS 1M chart Printed a textbook Morning Star reversal pattern 👀 Still facing the EMA50 resistance though, but the way everything is shaping up September could be pretty bullish for #Alts

3 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC24 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

💭 People ask me if I'm still bearish or fully bullish now, still expecting new lows or not, etc. This is my main scenario as long as we stay above the 200-Day MA. ⚠️ If we lose the 200-Day MA in October-November, that will automatically put new lows back on the table. $BTC 1D chart update So far so good. This chart is valid Here's what I'm expecting next: a pump to $85-88k by the end of the month and a 2-month c

2 Sept 2026, 15:50 UTC18 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

This Morning Star reversal pattern on the monthly usually marks the beginning of a new Bull Market 📈 🧐 $BTC

2 Sept 2026, 05:38 UTC17 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

$BTC 1M chart update Bears tried their best, but were only able to sweep the February low in June-July. So pathetic Now take a look at what Bulls did in August -> closed the monthly candle above the EMA9 & EMA21! That's impressive

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Whale_Tale. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

جواب سوالات سایت نهاد
@nahadchanal · 30,093
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Whale Tale 🐋” (@Whale_Tale), 3,324 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Whale_Tale.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.