Channel
@Whale_Friend
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,374subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001597581970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Whale_Friend |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Whale_Friend |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 3,374 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 3,378 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 3,382 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 3,382 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
91 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 65 | 71.4% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 12.1% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 11.0% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 26 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Интересно SP500 может рухнуть на 50%? Знаете такое вот чувство неизбежного глобального пиздеца, который коснется каждого ☹️ Да уже коснулось на самом деле, везде войны, сокращения, урезают зп, инфляция и т.д и т.п. С времен ковида идет затянувшийся сериал.
👍9🕊1
Да или просто бот в тг, по любому есть у кого нибудь который RSI сигналит. Пришлите в комменты плз 🥲
Хочу AI агента, чтобы он присылал мне сообщение в тг о том что где то на какой то паре RSI ушел ниже 30 на дневке или что образовался пин бар, а лучше и то и то сразу.
#BTC Потрогали 75 и отбились. Пока такие мысли, что будет возня до тех пор пока цена не доберется до верхней границы канала. Причём это может произойти просто боковиком и потом по идее будет спуск к нижней границе.
👍5
Я когда читаю подобные вещи мне становится максимально жутко
🔥3🗿2
Citrini был прав? ИИ вытесняет людей на обочину экономики? Джек Дорси уволил 40% Block (бывший Square) - около 4 000 человек. Компания при этом прибыльна, $24 млрд выручки в 2025, растёт. Написал детальный пост с объяснением - если коротко, причина одна: ИИ. Меньше людей, больше фокус на агентные процессы, компания станет ещё эффективнее. Его акция $XYZ +22% на премаркете. (рынок вознаграждает тех кто aligned с ИИ р…
👍4❤1
Citrini написали лонгрид - что если AI-бычий тезис полностью сбудется, но для экономики это окажется медвежьим. Не прогноз, а мысленный эксперимент, и он довольно жуткий в своей логичности. Статья вызвалу бурю критики в твиттере, и вчера (понедельник 23.02.26) спровоцировала массивную распродажу в некоторых секторах традфи (да, вот так и живем - какая-то думерская статейка может испарить сотню-другую ярдов капитализ…
👍2
#APT Стоп в б.у можно воткнуть и часть прикрыть
👍8
#APT Может отскок показать к 1-1.14-1.28, было бы круто через откат к 0.086. Отмена, если уйдёт под 0.80.
👍3
#FIGHT 10% есть, стоп в б.у
❤2
#FIGHT Скамчик пытается пробить наклонку. 20-40-97% цели. Интересно получится или нет.
🔥7
https://app.lighter.xyz/explorer/accounts/0 Адрес куда складывают байбеки $LIT
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Whale_Friend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 354,402 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Whale Friend” (@Whale_Friend), 3,374 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Whale_Friend.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.