Channel
@Wellmnn
On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,119subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003202080462 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Wellmnn |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Wellmnn |
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
1.3 average views per post against 8,119 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.016%. Across the 2,261 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,995 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 2.24% and 14.5%, with a median of 6.32%.
| Window | 30 days (31 July 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 18 of 18 published in the window (18 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 24 |
| Mature posts only | 0.016% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 8,119 measured 28 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:zho · 2,261 channels · p10 0.625% · p25 2.24% · p50 6.32% · p75 14.5% · p90 27.9% |
| Position in cohort | 0.044th percentile · 1/333 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.036% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 30 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 8,119 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 8,117 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 8,116 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 8,116 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (11 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 24 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 Cc公益端口 数据号 通知频道 📢 迪迦拯救昆明📸CCTV 📢 上海（怡红院）人气榜 📢 贵阳 技师 📢 源头-机器人开发|源码|网站|定制搭建二开 📢 秋叶公益项目主频道 📢 长沙来嫖 📢 AJ文案社🏖头像馆🌈壁纸 📢 上海品茗 📢 北海模型潮玩-玩具 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
⭐老师艺名：#小织梦 🪙地点兰州：#西固区 🪙身材比例：160cm 48kg🐻天然D 💵课费：600p 1200pp 🛫咨询老师：@XZmeng01 💬双向机器人：@XZmeng03_bot
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 Cc公益端口 数据号 通知频道 📢 迪迦拯救昆明📸CCTV 📢 上海（怡红院）人气榜 📢 源头-机器人开发|源码|网站|定制搭建二开 📢 贵阳 技师 📢 秋叶公益项目主频道 📢 长沙来嫖 📢 AJ文案社🏖头像馆🌈壁纸 📢 上海品茗 📢 Ayase直装主频道 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 七夜改文件官方🇨🇳《副频道》 📢 沈阳最新资源 📢 三角洲MVP公益 📢 kg集团 📢 昆明公开榜 📢 小芳的日常 📢 马桶先生 📢 频道封禁/解封/频道收录 📢 厦门出击日报鉴赏 📢 ATRI ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
⭐老师艺名：#莹莹 🪙地点兰州：#红古区 😊身材比例：168m 48kg🐻天然D 💵课费：600p 1200 pp 🛫咨询老师：@yingyingi2 💬双向机器人：@yingyingris_bot
⭐老师艺名：#椰奶 🪙地点兰州：#红古区 🪙身材比例：166m 46kg🐻天然C+ 💵课费：900p 1600 pp 🛫咨询老师：@YYYyenai0 💬双向机器人：@YYYyenai_bot
👍老师艺名：#雀瑾儿 👍地点兰州：#安宁区 👍身材比例：165cm 47kg🐻天然D 👍课费：800p 1500pp 👍咨询老师：@quejinerr 👍双向机器人：@quejiner001_bot
👍老师艺名：#希希 👍地点兰州：#安宁区 👍身材比例：160cm 48kg🐻天然D 👍课费：600p 1200pp 👍咨询老师：@xixibaoA1111 👍双向机器人：@xixixixi111_bot
👍老师艺名：#奶幼酥 👍地点兰州：#七里河区 👍身材比例：167cm 46kg🐻天然C+ 👍课费：600p 1200pp 👍咨询老师：@naiyousuBb1 👍双向机器人：@naiyousuoo1_bot
⭐老师艺名：#檀晚 🪙地点兰州：#城关区 🪙身材比例：164m 46kg🐻天然C+ 💵课费：800p 1500pp 🛫咨询老师：@chanwanwQ 💬双向机器人：@chanwaniii_bot
⭐老师艺名：#小织梦 🪙地点兰州：#西固区 🪙身材比例：160cm 48kg🐻天然D 💵课费：600p 1200pp 🛫咨询老师：@XZmeng01 💬双向机器人：@XZmeng03_bot
⭐老师艺名：#莹莹 🪙地点兰州：#红古区 😊身材比例：168m 48kg🐻天然D 💵课费：600p 1200 pp 🛫咨询老师：@yingyingi2 💬双向机器人：@yingyingris_bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Wellmnn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 869,835 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“无锡翠仙阁” (@Wellmnn), 8,119 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Wellmnn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.