百度户有没有可以做的
Signed 王富贵 收天马 Q群 CPA

Channel
@Wangfuguisefen
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,381subscribers
+123 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001669229989 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Wangfuguisefen |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Wangfuguisefen |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 1,381 | +61 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 1,320 | +27 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 1,293 | +9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 1,284 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:07 | 1,282 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 1,279 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 1,271 | +13 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 1,258 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 1,258 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,222 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
百度户有没有可以做的
Signed 王富贵 收天马 Q群 CPA
☹️👍☹️👍☹️👍 天马 Q群 CPA 色站浏览器(好站点) Q附近人 抖音粉丝群系列 快手真人直播 探探附近人头像转 抖音AB转 闲鱼 抖音自热 快手采集 Q站街 灵魂Q码 劫持技术粉 快手语音厅 抖音点赞 抖音截流粉丝群 色播V扫 小红书自热微转 抖音热评美女素材 陌陌动态V转 qq附近人 口信附近人 美团系列 Steam游戏粉 百度关键词贴吧 有量的来测, 假粉别浪费时间 杀杀杀 做数据的 杀杀杀 真粉无限☹️👍认准🟢 @wangfugui
Signed 王富贵 收天马 Q群 CPA
海的对面是家乡吗? 你说我们这一生还能走到对岸吗?
Signed 王富贵 收任何色粉
收全姿势色粉😃😄😃😄😃 天马:渠道姿势-打手-单价 (24小时) Q群:渠道姿势-打手-单价(24小时) CPA:渠道姿势-打手-单价(24小时)
Signed 王富贵 收任何色粉
收任何色粉,q群 天马 CPA 不收假粉
Signed 王富贵 收任何色粉
CPA来量 全吃 只要你能保产值 价格多少你来定!
Signed 王富贵
CPA色粉疯狂收价格起飞 炮台收色站cpa 优质站优先 真量不扣 0暗扣
Signed 王富贵
天马开工,有量直接报账量,真粉包结算
👎3
Signed 王富贵
有好姿势能打q群的联系我一下
Signed 王富贵
😂😂☹️☹️☹️☹️ 😃😃😃😄😃 ➡️高价大量收各类高产值色粉 😎抖音自热V转 😎抖音自热浏览器 😎抖音同城热评V 😎抖音同城热评浏览器 😎抖音协议点赞公众号 😎抖音热评公众号 😎抖音热评浏览器 😎抖音全姿势 😎小红书系列 😎陌陌全姿势 😎探探全姿势 😎灵魂全姿势 😎色播 楼凤 游戏 😎各种小平台 ➡️❗️❗️假粉勿扰❗️❗️ 欢迎各粉商,工作室以及手子跳槽合作,单价+1+2,长期稳定,大力扶持,产值3倍以上单价+3,实力承接,稳定上量,欢迎对接。 @wangfugui
Signed 王富贵
😂😂☹️☹️☹️☹️ 😃😃😃😄😃 ➡️高价大量收各类高产值色粉 😎抖音自热V转 😎抖音自热浏览器 😎抖音同城热评V 😎抖音同城热评浏览器 😎抖音协议点赞公众号 😎抖音热评公众号 😎抖音热评浏览器 😎抖音全姿势 😎小红书系列 😎陌陌全姿势 😎探探全姿势 😎灵魂全姿势 😎色播 楼凤 游戏 😎各种小平台 ➡️❗️❗️假粉勿扰❗️❗️ 欢迎各粉商,工作室以及手子跳槽合作,单价+1+2,长期稳定,大力扶持,产值3倍以上单价+3,实力承接,稳定上量,欢迎对接。 @wangfugui
Signed 王富贵
😂😂☹️☹️☹️☹️ 😃😃😃😄😃 ➡️高价大量收各类高产值色粉 😎抖音自热V转 😎抖音自热浏览器 😎抖音同城热评V 😎抖音同城热评浏览器 😎抖音协议点赞公众号 😎抖音热评公众号 😎抖音热评浏览器 😎抖音全姿势 😎小红书系列 😎陌陌全姿势 😎探探全姿势 😎灵魂全姿势 😎色播 楼凤 游戏 😎各种小平台 ➡️❗️❗️假粉勿扰❗️❗️ 欢迎各粉商,工作室以及手子跳槽合作,单价+1+2,长期稳定,大力扶持,产值3倍以上单价+3,实力承接,稳定上量,欢迎对接。 @wangfugui
Signed 王富贵
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Wangfuguisefen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“王富贵盘口收色粉频道” (@Wangfuguisefen), 1,381 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Wangfuguisefen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.