Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

متجر أيانتي 🎀

@W_M_15

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,655subscribers

+51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002188673942
TypeChannel
Username@W_M_15
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/W_M_15

Growth

1,6041,6701,6376 August 2026 — 1,604 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,651 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,670 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,655 subscribers1,6556 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,594–1,680 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:571,655-15
10 Aug 2026, 04:261,670+19
6 Aug 2026, 22:461,651+47
6 Aug 2026, 08:201,604first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.5%
avg views ÷ 1,655 subscribers
Avg views / post
720
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held7 (14 July 202620 July 2026)
Views total5,037
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC643 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ׅ ׄ ୭ৎ ׅ 𝗕𝖾𝖺𝘂𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗎𝗅 𝐍𝖾𝗐 ℙ𝗋𝗈𝖽𝘂𝖼𝗍 ໑ˬ . ‌ ⸦ ⋆ ۪ ֹ #𝗔ʏ𝖺𝗇𝕥𝗂_𝗦𝗍𝗈𝕣𝖾 ࣮ ֹ 🎀 ⸧ ───┈ ───┈ ───┈ ── ⋆ المُنتَج: ميداليات الشوكولاتة الفاخرة ✨🍫 تميزوا بتفاصيل أنيقة مع تعليقات المفاتيح والحقائب المصممة على شكل قطع الشوكولاتة الشهية. خامة جودة عالية ومشبك متين باللون البني. متوفرة بعدة أشكال وألوان متناسقة. - السَعر: 1 - التَوصِيل: الغزالية 3 ، بغداد والمحافظات 5 الطلب يلي سعره 50 التوصيل مجاني ╭──────────────╮ ╰──➛I

19 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC697 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

ׅ ׄ ୭ৎ ׅ 𝗕𝖾𝖺𝘂𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗎𝗅 𝐍𝖾𝗐 ℙ𝗋𝗈𝖽𝘂𝖼𝗍 ໑ˬ . ‌ ⸦ ⋆ ۪ ֹ #𝗔ʏ𝖺𝗇𝕥𝗂_𝗦𝗍𝗈𝕣𝖾 ࣮ ֹ 🎀 ⸧ ───┈ ───┈ ───┈ ── ⋆ المُنتَج: عطر ليبر يجسد الأناقة والثقة في كل رشة، بمزيج ساحر من الزهور الفرنسية والنفحات الدافئة التي تترك أثراً لا يُنسى - السَعر: 10 - التَوصِيل: الغزالية 3 ، بغداد والمحافظات 5 الطلب يلي سعره 50 التوصيل مجاني ╭──────────────╮ ╰──➛I للتواصل ꢁ @M_W_15 Iاراء فراشات ايانتي ꢁ @WWWMEV

15 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC857 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ׅ ׄ ୭ৎ ׅ 𝗕𝖾𝖺𝘂𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗎𝗅 𝐍𝖾𝗐 ℙ𝗋𝗈𝖽𝘂𝖼𝗍 ໑ˬ . ‌ ⸦ ⋆ ۪ ֹ #𝗔ʏ𝖺𝗇𝕥𝗂_𝗦𝗍𝗈𝕣𝖾 ࣮ ֹ 🎀 ⸧ ───┈ ───┈ ───┈ ── ⋆ المُنتَج: قلادة الشمس الترند - السَعر: 3 - التَوصِيل: الغزالية 3 ، بغداد والمحافظات 5 الطلب يلي سعره 50 التوصيل مجاني ╭──────────────╮ ╰──➛I للتواصل ꢁ @M_W_15 Iاراء فراشات ايانتي ꢁ @WWWMEV

14 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC805 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ׅ ׄ ୭ৎ ׅ 𝗕𝖾𝖺𝘂𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗎𝗅 𝐍𝖾𝗐 ℙ𝗋𝗈𝖽𝘂𝖼𝗍 ໑ˬ . ‌ ⸦ ⋆ ۪ ֹ #𝗔ʏ𝖺𝗇𝕥𝗂_𝗦𝗍𝗈𝕣𝖾 ࣮ ֹ 🎀 ⸧ ───┈ ───┈ ───┈ ── ⋆ المُنتَج: سدادة اكياس كورية ✨ - السَعر: 1 - التَوصِيل: الغزالية 3 ، بغداد والمحافظات 5 ╭──────────────╮ ╰──➛I للتواصل ꢁ @M_W_15 Iاراء فراشات ايانتي ꢁ @WWWMEV

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @W_M_15. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 18,562 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“متجر أيانتي 🎀” (@W_M_15), 1,655 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/W_M_15.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.