Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 3 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.4%
- avg views ÷ 1,046 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 130
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.65%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 391
- Videos
- 10
- Links
- 37
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
31 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
3 Oct 2026, 18:40 UTC103 views5 reactionsread 4 October 2026 File
白蛇裸奔范围[云更新]
更新内容:
适配4.6版本
支持四服 不禁网大范围
将范围与半火集合
框架 root通用
﹉﹉﹉﹉﹉﹉﹉﹉﹉﹉
稳定大号连打
无需root即可使用
卡秘仅需一杯奶茶钱
一卡两用 只需购买一张永久卡
[裸奔范围 裸奔半火卡秘通用]
无需root即可使用
内置裸奔功能:
裸奔聚点 裸奔防抖
裸奔除雾 裸奔内透
枪械射速 全枪秒切
裸奔范围 裸奔无后
混搭美化 衣服美化
枪械美化 血雾美化
购买地址:
https://shop.368fk.cn/shop/WQT7NB
反馈/免手续费联系: @KSWQ66
👍5
3 Oct 2026, 18:35 UTC429 views4 reactionsread 4 October 2026 频道准备认真玩了 目前所有项目均退出 仅白蛇范围存在 有没有好的项目作者来找我做代理 最好是公益的 @KSWQ6
👍4
3 Oct 2026, 18:34 UTC113 views3 reactionsread 4 October 2026 阿呆已下 刷屏不存在
👍3
3 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC122 views4 reactionsread 4 October 2026 这无疑是稳定的
👍4
3 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC121 views4 reactionsread 4 October 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4
3 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC114 views3 reactionsread 4 October 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
3 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC79 views3 reactionsread 4 October 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
3 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC47 views3 reactionsread 4 October 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
3 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC44 views2 reactionsread 4 October 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @WQZPD6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“白蛇范围【主频道】” (@WQZPD6), 1,046 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WQZPD6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.