Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VikingXBT's retarded takes

Channel

VikingXBT's retarded takes

@VikingXBT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,690subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001332361206
TypeChannel
Username@VikingXBT
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VikingXBT

Growth

1,6901,6941,6927 August 2026 — 1,694 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,694 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,692 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,690 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,689–1,695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:041,690-2
11 Aug 2026, 13:051,692-2
7 Aug 2026, 16:181,694no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:081,694first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 1,690 subscribers
Avg views / post
244
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,873
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VikingXBT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC32 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/vikingxbt/status/2085750765885284793 Someone answer me why you butcher your execution? You can still watch tokens on fomo without using it.

6 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC59 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BWEnews

AggrNews: ROBINHOOD US LISTS $CASHCAT AggrNews: ROBINHOOD 美国上架 $CASHCAT ———————————— 2026-08-06 20:41:54

1 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC195 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The only ones who properly ate from this little onchain season we had so far has been the ones launching launchpads. Wouldn't even be surprised if it's the same few people packing the same shit in a different name. Also with that said, if BTC/Majors start performing bad again, it doesn't exclude onchain continuously being good. It has thrived in those conditions before. I've taken a little bit of time to watch the

31 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC195 viewsread 7 August 2026

My weekly rant on Pump Fun team now grifting their own employees out of 7 figures: https://x.com/vikingxbt/status/2083164599902155026?s=61&t=BBszxz038jfQvf084opHPQ

26 Jul 2026, 10:07 UTC308 views0 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Use rh-scan.xyz as your explorer on Robinhood. Basically 1:1 etherscan instead of the trash default one!

26 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC300 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/100baggers_nft/status/2080967601216245839?s=46&t=Eg9GeypaC30AW2yBNBMUug

24 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC333 viewsread 7 August 2026

Price down on $SLVR, but I’m actually eating quite good regardless. Not as good as a few days ago, but I’m happy. https://x.com/vikingxbt/status/2080745454669603070?s=46&t=Eg9GeypaC30AW2yBNBMUug

23 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC367 viewsread 7 August 2026

There's a lot of issues with bridge liquidity. They all ran out.

23 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC359 viewsread 7 August 2026

Works for bridging to Stable too - Did it in the past 2 hours and bought $FEFER and a few low cap ponzis

22 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC375 viewsread 7 August 2026

Man, if you're not using basedbot yet for Robinhood, try it out. It's honestly "life changing" for me in terms of trade execution and wallet tracking etc. I use telegram for alerts and buys as I prefer to type it there and sells, managing, tracking etc on the web - which also works great in your phone browser! I'm not paid by basedbot-or any other trading terminal for that matter. I just genuinely enjoy the product

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VikingXBT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VikingXBT's retarded takes” (@VikingXBT), 1,690 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VikingXBT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.