Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🌐 全球观察 · 曝光第一线

Channel

🌐 全球观察 · 曝光第一线

@VietNAMVPNVN

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

56,098subscribers

+15,976 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001844767101
TypeChannel
Username@VietNAMVPNVN
Description#东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 东南亚大事件频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,海外华人求助,让你看尽海外华人大小事。 本频道谢绝任何政治敏感新闻,新闻仅供参考,无刻意引导~~避免我们的评论区火药味变得更重。 投稿:
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/VietNAMVPNVN

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

1.4 average views per post against 56,098 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.003%. Across the 1,310 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,545 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 0.984% and 5.71%, with a median of 2.42%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (25 September 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Posts measured131 of 131 published in the window (131 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled187
Mature posts only0.004% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers56,098 measured 24 October 2026
Cohortb31623:zho · 1,310 channels · p10 0.252% · p25 0.984% · p50 2.42% · p75 5.71% · p90 11.1%
Position in cohort0.076th percentile · 1/1000 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.051% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageChinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 25 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,07556,70632,390.57 August 2026 — 40,122 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,122 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,327 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,759 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,521 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,801 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,608 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,159 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,132 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,199 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,978 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,097 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,564 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,271 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,737 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,086 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,326 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,795 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,180 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,910 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,478 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,798 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,297 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,233 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,830 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,279 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,959 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,715 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,670 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,684 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,621 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,057 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,657 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,807 subscribers30 September 2026 — 9,034 subscribers7 October 2026 — 8,075 subscribers13 October 2026 — 47,773 subscribers14 October 2026 — 56,706 subscribers15 October 2026 — 56,432 subscribers16 October 2026 — 56,408 subscribers17 October 2026 — 56,340 subscribers18 October 2026 — 56,323 subscribers19 October 2026 — 56,302 subscribers20 October 2026 — 56,281 subscribers21 October 2026 — 56,214 subscribers22 October 2026 — 56,188 subscribers24 October 2026 — 56,154 subscribers24 October 2026 — 56,098 subscribers56,0987 August 202624 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 78 days, net +15,976. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 780–64,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 23:1056,098-56
24 Oct 2026, 00:4656,154-34
22 Oct 2026, 22:3756,188-26
21 Oct 2026, 16:4756,214-67
20 Oct 2026, 13:0656,281-21
19 Oct 2026, 10:4656,302-21
18 Oct 2026, 11:1956,323-17
17 Oct 2026, 13:5656,340-68
16 Oct 2026, 16:2756,408-24
15 Oct 2026, 19:0956,432-274
14 Oct 2026, 19:1856,706+8,933
13 Oct 2026, 07:2847,773+39,698
7 Oct 2026, 04:008,075-959
30 Sept 2026, 07:379,034-773
19 Sept 2026, 17:029,807-850
17 Sept 2026, 03:1710,657-400
15 Sept 2026, 06:1511,057-564
13 Sept 2026, 16:3611,621-1,063
12 Sept 2026, 00:5912,684-986
9 Sept 2026, 16:5713,670first reading

Engagement

675 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.002%
avg views ÷ 56,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.4
142 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
142
of 675 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held675 (7 August 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Views total198
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Oct 2026, 21:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈14,700
Videos
≈2,430
Links
≈3,470

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 17m
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 196 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

25 Oct 2026, 15:18 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Photo

菲律宾司法部警告电诈窝点重新出现,部分中国籍人员利用免签入境 10月25日,据《菲律宾星报》报道,菲律宾司法部副部长尼古拉斯·费利克斯·蒂表示,近期执法行动发现,菲律宾部分地区可能再次出现小规模电诈窝点。 本月早些时候,执法部门在三宝颜锡布盖省等地开展行动,控制约200名外国人。司法部指出,部分涉案人员为中国籍人士,可能通过免签政策入境,其中一些人涉嫌逾期居留。 调查还发现,部分中国籍人员可能在受聘时就被要求以中国公民为诈骗目标。 司法部表示,目前查获的窝点规模较过去大型离岸博彩园区明显缩小,涉案人员构成也有所变化,相关调查仍在进行中。 关注东南亚大事件投稿👉 @iphone18

25 Oct 2026, 15:18 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Photo

菲律宾司法部警告电诈窝点重新出现,部分中国籍人员利用免签入境 10月25日,据《菲律宾星报》报道,菲律宾司法部副部长尼古拉斯·费利克斯·蒂表示,近期执法行动发现,菲律宾部分地区可能再次出现小规模电诈窝点。 本月早些时候,执法部门在三宝颜锡布盖省等地开展行动,控制约200名外国人。司法部指出,部分涉案人员为中国籍人士,可能通过免签政策入境,其中一些人涉嫌逾期居留。 调查还发现,部分中国籍人员可能在受聘时就被要求以中国公民为诈骗目标。 司法部表示,目前查获的窝点规模较过去大型离岸博彩园区明显缩小,涉案人员构成也有所变化,相关调查仍在进行中。 关注海外大事件👉 @USD1 投稿👉 @USDE

25 Oct 2026, 14:55 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Photo

柬埔寨8号园区金主曝光:罗平华是谁? 柬埔寨备受关注的“8号园区”,背后的金主究竟是谁?随着美国制裁和国际媒体调查,越来越多的信息浮出水面。 有组织犯罪与腐败报道项目(OCCRP)10月23日发表调查报道,披露中国湖南商人罗平华(英文名Brendon Luo)与8号园区的关系。根据OCCRP获得的柬埔寨政府文件,罗平华是传奇创新有限公司(Legend Innovation)的登记所有人,而这家公司正是8号园区的运营方。 今年6月,美国财政部已对罗平华实施制裁,指控他与另一名人士是太子集团相关电诈园区的主要投资者。 罗平华1987年出生于中国湖南,今年39岁,持有柬埔寨、瓦努阿图和塞浦路斯的护照。 罗平华还曾担任太子广场投资有限公司董事,该公司于2025年10月被美国列入太子集团相关制裁名单。 8号园区位于柬埔寨波罗勉省,也被称为“芒奇商业城”,是柬埔寨近年来最受关注的大型电诈园区之一。(*图1-2) 今年3月,英国…

25 Oct 2026, 14:55 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Photo

柬埔寨8号园区金主曝光:罗平华是谁? 柬埔寨备受关注的“8号园区”,背后的金主究竟是谁?随着美国制裁和国际媒体调查,越来越多的信息浮出水面。 有组织犯罪与腐败报道项目(OCCRP)10月23日发表调查报道,披露中国湖南商人罗平华(英文名Brendon Luo)与8号园区的关系。根据OCCRP获得的柬埔寨政府文件,罗平华是传奇创新有限公司(Legend Innovation)的登记所有人,而这家公司正是8号园区的运营方。 今年6月,美国财政部已对罗平华实施制裁,指控他与另一名人士是太子集团相关电诈园区的主要投资者。 罗平华1987年出生于中国湖南,今年39岁,持有柬埔寨、瓦努阿图和塞浦路斯的护照。 罗平华还曾担任太子广场投资有限公司董事,该公司于2025年10月被美国列入太子集团相关制裁名单。 8号园区位于柬埔寨波罗勉省,也被称为“芒奇商业城”,是柬埔寨近年来最受关注的大型电诈园区之一。(*图1-2) 今年3月,英国…

25 Oct 2026, 14:32 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Photo

#网友爆料:70万转进艾圣富老婆账户,一句“银行卡被冻结”就没了下文?我哥太相信人,最后却落得这个下场! 这几天我夜不能寐,思来想去,决定把事情写出来。之前看到对艾圣富的举报,我没亲眼目睹的事就不多说。今天只讲发生在我大哥身上的事。 一、70万去向我只是个普通打工的,没背景也不想惹事。但大哥出事了,我不能不说话。 前段时间,大哥需要洗钱,通过艾圣富操作。70万元人民币转到了艾圣富老婆的银行卡上。转过去后,艾圣富声称银行卡被冻结,此后这笔钱再无下文。 我所知的是,这70万里有几十万可能涉及银行冻结,还有部分与大哥之前赌博欠款以及艾圣富代为处理的事项有关。完整账目我没经手,也没看到全部流水,所以具体情况我无法完全确认。 毕竟是70万元,不是小数目。 二、西港出事没过几天,我们团队在西港出事了。很多人被抓,大哥也被带走。我当时刚好外出打针,没在现场。消息传来时,我整个人都懵了。 三、我必须曝光如果只是普通老板和员工关系,…

25 Oct 2026, 14:32 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Photo

#网友爆料:70万转进艾圣富老婆账户,一句“银行卡被冻结”就没了下文?我哥太相信人,最后却落得这个下场! 这几天我夜不能寐,思来想去,决定把事情写出来。之前看到对艾圣富的举报,我没亲眼目睹的事就不多说。今天只讲发生在我大哥身上的事。 一、70万去向我只是个普通打工的,没背景也不想惹事。但大哥出事了,我不能不说话。 前段时间,大哥需要洗钱,通过艾圣富操作。70万元人民币转到了艾圣富老婆的银行卡上。转过去后,艾圣富声称银行卡被冻结,此后这笔钱再无下文。 我所知的是,这70万里有几十万可能涉及银行冻结,还有部分与大哥之前赌博欠款以及艾圣富代为处理的事项有关。完整账目我没经手,也没看到全部流水,所以具体情况我无法完全确认。 毕竟是70万元,不是小数目。 二、西港出事没过几天,我们团队在西港出事了。很多人被抓,大哥也被带走。我当时刚好外出打针,没在现场。消息传来时,我整个人都懵了。 三、我必须曝光如果只是普通老板和员工关系,…

25 Oct 2026, 14:10 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Photo

马来西亚怡保移民局夜间突查,109名外国人被扣留 据马来西亚国家新闻社(Bernama)10月25日报道,马来西亚移民局于10月24日晚至25日凌晨,在霹雳州怡保市展开两项执法行动,共扣留109名外国人,其中包括34名女性和75名男性。行动由霹雳州移民局、布城移民局特别行动情报部门及警方联合展开,共出动66名执法人员。 一、娱乐场所及按摩中心突查,34名女性被扣留 10月24日晚9时,移民局展开名为“Ops Gegar”的执法行动,对怡保市一家娱乐场所及4家按摩中心进行检查。 行动期间,执法人员共检查70名外国人,并扣留其中34名女性。根据官方报道,被扣留人员来自泰国和越南。 二、怡保批发市场检查,75名男性被扣留 10月25日凌晨1时30分,执法人员转赴怡保批发市场展开第二项行动。 当局共检查77名外国人,最终扣留75名男性,涉及缅甸、孟加拉国、老挝及印度尼西亚籍人员。 三、涉嫌违反移民法规,5名雇主接传票 根据移…

25 Oct 2026, 14:10 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Photo

马来西亚怡保移民局夜间突查,109名外国人被扣留 据马来西亚国家新闻社(Bernama)10月25日报道,马来西亚移民局于10月24日晚至25日凌晨,在霹雳州怡保市展开两项执法行动,共扣留109名外国人,其中包括34名女性和75名男性。行动由霹雳州移民局、布城移民局特别行动情报部门及警方联合展开,共出动66名执法人员。 一、娱乐场所及按摩中心突查,34名女性被扣留 10月24日晚9时,移民局展开名为“Ops Gegar”的执法行动,对怡保市一家娱乐场所及4家按摩中心进行检查。 行动期间,执法人员共检查70名外国人,并扣留其中34名女性。根据官方报道,被扣留人员来自泰国和越南。 二、怡保批发市场检查,75名男性被扣留 10月25日凌晨1时30分,执法人员转赴怡保批发市场展开第二项行动。 当局共检查77名外国人,最终扣留75名男性,涉及缅甸、孟加拉国、老挝及印度尼西亚籍人员。 三、涉嫌违反移民法规,5名雇主接传票 根据移…

25 Oct 2026, 13:48 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Video

#执法视频:马来西亚移民局近日在吉隆坡安普路(Jalan Ampang)一家夜总会展开突击执法行动,共检查113人,并逮捕68名外籍人员,其中包括54名泰国籍人员及14名孟加拉籍人员。 关注东南亚大事件投稿👉 @iphone18

25 Oct 2026, 13:48 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Video

#执法视频:马来西亚移民局近日在吉隆坡安普路(Jalan Ampang)一家夜总会展开突击执法行动,共检查113人,并逮捕68名外籍人员,其中包括54名泰国籍人员及14名孟加拉籍人员。 关注海外大事件👉 @USD1 投稿👉 @USDE

25 Oct 2026, 13:34 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Photo

#群友反馈:今天西港OB5山顶公寓这次检查只抓了几个没护照的傻逼,还有房间有电脑的,而且这几个人把电脑扔下来差点砸到警察,所以才调了大部队来查的 有护照的没事,而且有本地女友的房间也没查,就是问问就过去了,算是保守执法了,而且本地物业也算办了正事,帮忙解释和谈判,算是还不错了 关注东南亚大事件投稿👉 @iphone18

25 Oct 2026, 09:48 UTC1 viewsread 25 October 2026
Photo

🇱🇰 中国籍网络诈骗巨头斯里兰卡遭绑架杀害 揭示跨国黑产转移隐患 据OCCRP及《周日泰晤士报》报道,今年7月23日凌晨,31岁的中国籍网络诈骗高管陈国庆(音译)在斯里兰卡科伦坡港口城被十几名男子绑架,随后被押至70公里外的乡村虐待致死。 调查显示,受害者拥有三重身份及柬埔寨(化名Chen Hao)和苏里南(化名Tao Guoqing)两本护照。斯警方已逮捕5名涉案中国籍嫌犯,另有3人在逃。警方认为此案系犯罪集团内部资金纠纷引发的买凶杀人。 专家指出,此案凸显了网诈集团因东南亚(如柬埔寨)严打而向斯里兰卡等执法薄弱地区转移的趋势。尽管斯里兰卡警方曾大规模逮捕涉诈人员,但迄今尚无一例针对跨国诈骗犯罪的成功起诉。 关注东南亚大事件投稿👉 @iphone18

Showing the 12 most recent of 675 posts we hold for @VietNAMVPNVN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌐 全球观察 · 曝光第一线” (@VietNAMVPNVN), 56,098 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VietNAMVPNVN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.