#广东广电 #ExpressVPN 好吧并不怎么能用,回到广东了

Channel
VPN测评-各类VPN相关资讯+真实测评
@VPNceping
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,221subscribers
-35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001488578327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VPNceping |
| Created | Between 1 May 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VPNceping |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 09:41 | 2,221 | -2 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 2,223 | -14 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 2,237 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 2,242 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 2,244 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 2,243 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:05 | 2,249 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 2,252 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 2,255 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 2,258 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 2,257 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 2,258 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 2,256 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 2,256 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 2 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
ExpressVPN这两天在内地开始变得比较可用了,最开始我以为仅限电信,结果发现广电也能用,就是不知道是不是江西没这么严格的限制,我在广东反正是基本不可用的
新年快乐
#ExpressVPN 开始搞花活了,开始折腾各种VPN以外的业务了,学NordVPN搞各种分级别的套餐了,不同的套餐包含不同的东西了,就是不知道现有套餐订阅是否包含所有组件。以及价格也下降了,这是要从高端的定位上走下来吗?不过我对那个临时邮件挺感兴趣的,密码管理器就纯纯一坨了。 https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/vpns/no-longer-just-a-vpn-expressvpn-launches-four-new-products-to-create-a-total-privacy-suite
#Surfshark #广东电信 新加坡节点在连上一段时间后会极慢/没网,所以我又去试了下日本和台湾节点,然后发现日本会有m247和datacamp两种,然后m247会有多跑几次测速后速度降低到20mbps的情况,不清楚是电信在搞鬼还是什么情况,但日本节点整体上来看延迟和速度都更优,虽然cloudflare并不这么认为
#Surfshark #广东电信 相对来说最近一两年Surfshark在中国内地的体验给我的感受是最好的,延迟不咋地(毕竟是datacamp),但速度还是能跑得上去的,而且绝大部分情况下还是比较容易连上的,比同为一家人的 #NordVPN 好到不知道哪里去了。别的节点我就不知道了,我就看了个最快写的是新加坡就直接连接了
#ExpressVPN #广东移动 #广东电信 移动直接死球了死活连不上,电信要么不停地断联要么卡的生活不能自理,基本处于不可用的状态,离谱是我选pick it up,连上了美国后我连测速页面都打不开,回来一看发现变日本了,后来选到香港才勉强打开测速页面,但结果也是可想而知
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @VPNceping. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VPN测评-各类VPN相关资讯+真实测评” (@VPNceping), 2,221 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VPNceping.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.