8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,567–8,592 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 02:11
8,577
-2
24 Aug 2026, 20:24
8,579
-10
21 Aug 2026, 05:47
8,589
+16
18 Aug 2026, 10:34
8,573
-9
15 Aug 2026, 17:16
8,582
+12
11 Aug 2026, 21:53
8,570
-4
8 Aug 2026, 19:34
8,574
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:03
8,574
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 8,577 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,860
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
21 (23 March 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
3,714
Reactions total
95
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
57
Videos
4
Links
154
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
31s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,349 reactions across 21 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
725
53.7%
🔥
294
21.8%
👍
188
13.9%
👏
44
3.26%
💯
32
2.37%
🙏
14
1.04%
🤣
12
0.89%
👌
11
0.815%
❤🔥
7
0.519%
🎉
5
0.371%
😁
5
0.371%
👀
4
0.297%
🏆
3
0.222%
👎
3
0.222%
🆒
1
0.074%
🤩
1
0.074%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,349reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
CHAOS: Where you dreams go to die…
Back in 2014/15, I was pissing away 16 hours a week consuming a steady stream of partisan red meat. The result? I became a person consumed by anxiety and anger. My marriage was hanging by a thread.
I was shooting blanks in what I call the Theater of Chaos.
The Theater of Chaos is where your decision-making ammo is completely squandered on uncontrollable, uninfluencable BS. Yes, ar…
A decision I made 40 years ago still haunts me today. ☠️
When I was 16, I was overweight, invisible, and desperate for an "Easy" fix to be cool. Instead of choosing Hard (hitting the gym or learning a skill), I bought a dirt bike.
Four minutes of cheap adrenaline cost me forty years of physical pain.
I didn't just make a bad choice—I drew from life's Death Deck.
Nobody knowingly puts the Death Deck in their hands…
Fact: I live easy in a large comfort zone.
Fact: You’ll live hard in a small one.
Gurus love telling you your comfort zone is your ultimate enemy. They say you need to "break" it or "step out" of it to find success.
Bullshit.
Your comfort zone isn't the enemy. Its pathetic size is.
Imagine being trapped inside a tiny plastic bubble dropped smack in the middle of a 5-star beach resort. You’re nose-pressed against …
I spent four years writing Choose Hard, Live Easy, packing it with over 70+ mental models. And throughout the entire process, one ominous warning from Aldous Huxley echoed in my head:
"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude... producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties take…
9+ Asymmetric Decisions You'd be a Fool Not to Make! 📉📈
You never know which casual choice is the one where you're unknowingly betting your entire life savings to win a penny.
Most people are getting absolutely ruined by downside asymmetry—betting massive amounts of their time, health, and money for a cheap hit of dopamine or a tiny reward. NO ONE wakes up and consciously decides to have ten bucks in their bank ac…
Most people manage their money with forensic obsession. They comparison-shop for a dollar off gas, agonize over a $12 streaming subscription, and can tell you within a few bucks what's sitting in their checking account.
Yet, those same people will gamble away something infinitely more scarce, and do so without blinking. 📉
In my latest video, I offer you a coin flip that could potentially save your life from an enco…
A lot of you asked me over the years to return to YouTube and I have. This is my first video in 4 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQTAVn99oYE
I plan to do a few videos per month in the realms of Fastlane business, decision-making, and entrepreneurship. Maybe even a few AI takes. Please subscribe if you want to level-up your life and learn from someone who is truly living in the top 10% of the 1% life.
My so…
Let's be clear. I'm completely BULLISH on AI as the largest wealth window ever created in human history.
But I'm completely BEARISH on humans' ability to use it wisely with the appropriate guardrails.
One chart explains how you create wealth fast. 📈💸
Look at this graphic. This is the Wealth Window.
It’s a predictable, repeating cycle where early adoption meets massive opportunity. Every few years, the window cracks open, a new batch of millionaires sprints through, and then the latch clicks shut.
Choose Hard is a big cheat code, but only if you recognize, exploit, and direct it into a Wealth Window.
Deployed i…
The ultimate cure for low self-esteem and depression...
Learn something new.
Figure out a problem.
Choose Hard.
And then when you're on top of the mountain of the problem you just solved, OBSERVE how you feel.
Feel that rush? That high?
That's achievement.
Confidence.
The feeling that you can DO ANYTHING with the right process and effort.
As I wrote in Choose Hard, Live Easy - I've been learning jump rope an…
{{{ THIS }}} is the easiest decision any human can make… and it will also be your best…
Even better, you can do it sitting on your couch.
But to obtain life’s ultimate status symbol, you’ll need to get off that couch.
👇👇👇
https://news.thefastlaneforum.com/preview/364132/emails/185473847712023827
❤22🙏7🔥4👏1
Signed MJ DeMarco
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @UnscriptedNetwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Unscripted Entrepreneurial Network” (@UnscriptedNetwork), 8,577 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnscriptedNetwork.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
