Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UI UX 💒

Channel

UI UX 💒

@UXUI_design

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

3,610subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001100046194
TypeChannel
Username@UXUI_design
CreatedBetween 1 December 2016 and 30 April 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/UXUI_design

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,6103,6353,622.56 August 2026 — 3,635 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,635 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,634 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,631 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,628 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,625 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,621 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,610 subscribers6 August 202624 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 18 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,606–3,639 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 03:443,610-11
20 Aug 2026, 02:143,621-4
16 Aug 2026, 16:163,625-3
13 Aug 2026, 06:353,628-3
9 Aug 2026, 20:213,631-3
6 Aug 2026, 09:453,634-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:333,635no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:193,635first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

245 reactions across 19 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5522.4%
🔥5120.8%
4317.6%
🦄2610.6%
👏156.12%
💘114.49%
❤‍🔥104.08%
🥰83.27%
🎄62.45%
👀62.45%
👨‍💻31.22%
20.816%
👎20.816%
🍓10.408%
🍾10.408%
🕊10.408%
😁10.408%
🤓10.408%
🤝10.408%
🤬10.408%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2024 to 7 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @UXUI_design. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 October 2024 to 7 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Mar 2026, 11:47 UTC≈2,320 views10 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Новый подкаст на который пришел Раму 🧿 https://youtube.com/shorts/4zzNcBe_XEk?is=3wOSKzBBjj6KAYNX Универсальные аргументы при зашите своего дизайна.

4🥰3🦄2👍1

15 Dec 2025, 14:58 UTC≈3,680 views2 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Poll

Чувствуете новые флюиды пошли?

  1. 😵 Чувствую в худшую сторону35%
  2. ☕️ Чувствую в лучшую сторону17%
  3. 👍 Я вообще ничего не чувствую43%
  4. Напишу ответ в чатике5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤝1🤬1

15 Dec 2025, 14:50 UTC≈3,510 views11 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

🤡 Иногда кажется, что быть дизайнером — это попытка договориться с миром на языке, которого у мира нет. Хочу поговорить, желательно в формате диалога в комментах, о том как обстоят дела с работой у котов, в каких корзинках сидите и хорошо ли за вами ухаживают. 🪖 Для старта диалога провела расследование: Как изменился уровень ЗП Важные ключевые навыки в резюме Требования к дизайнерам Кто выжил на рынке Другая полез

🔥54👍2

4 Mar 2025, 14:55 UTC≈9,370 views18 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Архетипы в дизайне: Прокачай интерфейс через психологию Факт от Юнга: Наш мозг видит символы быстрее, чем читает текст. Именно поэтому логотип Apple или знак Nike мгновенно вызывают у тебя эмоции — они активируют архетипы в подсознании. Что внутри статьи? Как "Герой", "Мудрец" и "Любовник" прокачивают дизайн и бренды? Почему форма круга делает образовательные приложения круче? Как создать интерфейс, который заст

7👍5🔥3🦄3

24 Feb 2025, 16:13 UTC≈6,770 views1 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Poll

Друзья, какой формат вам интереснее?

  1. 🏆 Гайды56%
  2. 🥂 Личные консультации15%
  3. 🧠 Обучающие курсы40%
  4. 🚀 Готовые шаблоны43%
  5. Напишу свой вариант в комментах0%

The shares total 154%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1

21 Feb 2025, 09:00 UTC≈6,510 views11 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как психотипы формируют дизайн: Эпилептоид против Гипертима, или почему ваш арт-директор требует таблицы в Figma Если дизайн — это язык визуального мышления, то психотипы — его грамматика. 👮‍♂️ Эпилептоид создаёт дизайн как чёткую систему, где пиксели маршируют по сетке. 🤩 Истероид хочет вау-эффекта, хайпа и больше неонов. 🔮 А шизоид теряется в экзистенциальных мыслях, потому что баннер — это вообще иллюзия восприя

❤‍🔥8🦄2👍1

14 Feb 2025, 09:00 UTC≈4,640 views17 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Идея для дизайна интерфейса: Динамическое цветовое кодирование по Кандинскому, Кеплеру и Пифагору А что есть взять историю музыкальных нот, теорию Пифагора о музыке сфер и исследования о цвете Кандинского? Мы много раз обсуждали, что идеи для дизайна - это в первую очередь наши интересы и самообразование, широта души. Вот один из примеров совмещения интересующих меня теорий и того, как их можно применить в дизайне.

👍9🦄5❤‍🔥2💘1

31 Jan 2025, 11:38 UTC≈4,010 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какая твоя ведущая стихия?

  1. 🌊 Вода36%
  2. ☄️ Огонь28%
  3. 🌪 Воздух20%
  4. 🌳 Земля16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jan 2025, 11:35 UTC≈3,840 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Как расширить воображение через стихии. Одно из главных эволюционных преимуществ человека — это способность моделировать будущее в уме. Эта способность основана на работе префронтальной коры, которая строит воображаемые сценарии. Быстрая тренировка на "симулятор реальности": Разделите холст на 4 части. Каждому квадрату присвойте одну эмоцию: 😊 радость / 😔 грусть / 😡 гнев / 😌 спокойствие Каждой эмоции присвойте пр

👍52🔥1

27 Jan 2025, 13:49 UTC≈3,460 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Фундаментальные принципы дизайна. Сегодня говорим о фундаментальных принципах дизайна. Всего есть два кита, на которых держится весь дизайн. Над ними можно строить что угодно: нагромождать верблюдов, возводить целые вселенные, но основа всегда остаётся неизменной, эти киты обеспечивают устойчивость и целостность всего построения. В статье: Принцип первый: Мысль существует только в визуальном воплощении. Нет картин

👍10🔥32👏2

20 Jan 2025, 14:42 UTC≈3,390 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Идеи для внедрения онтологических и онтических уровней в UI/UX Внедрение понятий "онтологического" и "онтического" в UI/UX-дизайн связано с созданием системы, которая помогает пользователю воспринимать различие между поверхностным опытом (чувственным, предметным, "онтическим") и более глубоким смысловым уровнем (структурой, связями, "онтологическим"). Это может быть реализовано через дизайн, который буквально "воспи

🔥9👍2🕊1🥰1🦄1

15 Jan 2025, 08:46 UTC≈3,210 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Подробнее про личный бренд по Юнгу. Зачем нужно распознавать архетипы и как это реализовано в дизайне?

👍81

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UXUI_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Dec 2025, 14:58 UTCAnonymous Poll75 voters

Чувствуете новые флюиды пошли?

  1. 😵 Чувствую в худшую сторону35%
  2. ☕️ Чувствую в лучшую сторону17%
  3. 👍 Я вообще ничего не чувствую43%
  4. Напишу ответ в чатике5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Feb 2025, 16:13 UTCAnonymous Poll117 voters

Друзья, какой формат вам интереснее?

  1. 🏆 Гайды56%
  2. 🥂 Личные консультации15%
  3. 🧠 Обучающие курсы40%
  4. 🚀 Готовые шаблоны43%
  5. Напишу свой вариант в комментах0%

The shares total 154%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jan 2025, 11:38 UTCAnonymous Poll171 voters

Какая твоя ведущая стихия?

  1. 🌊 Вода36%
  2. ☄️ Огонь28%
  3. 🌪 Воздух20%
  4. 🌳 Земля16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Dec 2024, 12:05 UTCAnonymous Poll63 voters

А какой твой ведущий радикал?

  1. паранойяльный (целеустремленный) 💼21%
  2. истероидный (демонстративный) 💃19%
  3. эпилептоидный (застревающий и возбудимый) 🧐14%
  4. шизоидный (странный) 👻14%
  5. гипертимный (жизнерадостный) 😂13%
  6. эмотивный (чувствительный) 🥺33%
  7. тревожный (боязливый) 🙈29%

The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2024 to 7 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UI UX 💒” (@UXUI_design), 3,610 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UXUI_design.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.