Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for توییتر دانشگاه صنعتی اراک

Channel

توییتر دانشگاه صنعتی اراک

@TwitterAUT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,858subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001159646678
TypeChannel
Username@TwitterAUT
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TwitterAUT

Growth

1,8581,8731,865.57 August 2026 — 1,873 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,873 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,870 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,867 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,864 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,863 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,862 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,858 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,856–1,875 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 03:431,858-4
24 Aug 2026, 01:581,862-1
20 Aug 2026, 01:111,863-1
17 Aug 2026, 10:271,864-3
13 Aug 2026, 12:461,867-3
10 Aug 2026, 19:211,870-3
7 Aug 2026, 01:301,873no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:191,873first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.7%
avg views ÷ 1,858 subscribers
Avg views / post
440
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held27 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total11,868
Reactions total333
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

333 reactions across 24 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24974.8%
👎5015.0%
3410.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 333reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC208 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بین دانشگاه صنعتی اراک و دانشگاه آکسفورد کدوم رو بزنم؟ #مارتنزیت @Twitteraut

👍8

7 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC207 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

الان تازه پیوی ایتا رو نگاه کردم و دیدم اصلا امتحانی که توی خرداد داده بودم رو استاد سین نزده بوده ولی نمره هارو رد کرده بود #خانوم_لوبیا @Twitteraut

👍61

7 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC266 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

دعوا داخل توییتر دانشگاه رو دیدم و بعدش دانشگاه تعطیل و اعضا دانشگاه در استراحت یا روانشناسی سیاه افتادم #کهکشان @Twitteraut

7 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC435 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

این همه طولانی تایپ می‌کنید من نگران #چرنوبیل ام. کاش تا الان به مقصد رسیده باشه #رسانا @Twitteraut

👍9

7 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC436 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

وقتی فرق بین خوابگاه خودگردان و استیجاری و ملکی رو نمیدونی از خودت تِز نده لطفا! یکی اومده گفته سال فلان ارشدا عملکرد خوبی داشتن،طرف جوابشو داده که زحمت خوده ارشدا بوده به اساتید ارتباطی نداشته چون همون استادی که داره برای ارشدا تدریس میکنه،واسه کارشناسی هم داره تدریس میکنه ارشدا یه پیش زمینه ای دارن درباره واحدایی که میخونن و بیشتر کارشون مطالعه و تحقیقه برای همین عملکرد خوبی داشتن کارشناسی پیش زمینه ای نداره و بای

👍81👎1

7 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC456 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ای دورت بگردم من اگر واقعا قراره پایاننامه های صنعتی اراک رو بررسی کنی پس حداقل چندتا جلسه دفاع ارشد برو و ببین سطحشونو تا متوجه بشی چقدر فرمالیته دارن میگیرن ازشون. چهارترمه که نه پنج ترمه تموم کردن ارشد هم که والا ما که بودیم چیزی ندیدیم جز محدودی ایشالله از این به بعد باشه. شرط مقاله هم که خدابخواد ندیدیم داشته باشن بچه های ارشد اون دانشگاه پس این آمار رتبه برتری دانشگاه از کجا اومده رو خدا میدونه. گفتی خوابگاه آ

👍5👎2

6 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC498 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

چرا وفتی حال هست کار نیست؟ وقتی کار هست حال نیست؟ #هان @Twitteraut

5👍4

6 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC480 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

قربون شکل ماهت اشتباه متوجه شدی پیامشو نمیگه که تو کنکور ارشد رتبه ۱ آورده که میگه عملکرد مقطع کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه ما نسبت به بقیه دانشگاه ها،رتبه بالا آورده هزینه هم داره برای دانشگاه های دیگه رو داره میگه خوابگاه بیات هم یه خوابگاه خودگردان خصوصیه اینم که میگی یه همچین مبلغی دادید واسه هر ترم که به نظرم زیاد بوده باید خودتون به فکر خودتون میبودید و حرفتونو میزدید چرا بحث ها رو باهم قاطی میکنی؟ #گولوگولو @Twitter

👍2

6 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC496 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ببین چه شری انداختی... #کا_گ_ب @Twitteraut

👍11👎2

6 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC510 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

واقعا خوابگاه ملکی امتیاز و تبلیغ بزرگیه که توی توضیحات دانشگاه صنعتی اراک توی دفترچه انتخاب رشته گذاشتن من خودم رتبه ام به دانشگاه خواجه نصیر می‌رسید ولی چون خوابگاهش معلوم نبود کجاس بی خیالش شدم #کامپوزیتی @Twitteraut

👎21👍82

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @TwitterAUT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 944,575 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پاسخ آزمون های نهاد - جواب ازمون نهاد
@NahadChannel · 171,527
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
شخص غایب ༄.°
@missing158 · 43,498
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“توییتر دانشگاه صنعتی اراک” (@TwitterAUT), 1,858 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TwitterAUT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.