Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 黑神话不悟空(舍经记)

Channel

黑神话不悟空(舍经记)

@TranGPT7

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,319subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002069997538
TypeChannel
Username@TranGPT7
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TranGPT7

Growth

1,3181,3331,325.57 August 2026 — 1,333 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,333 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,332 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,328 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,327 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,323 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,322 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,318 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,319 subscribers1,3197 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,316–1,335 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 03:231,319+1
24 Aug 2026, 01:081,318-4
20 Aug 2026, 03:531,322-1
17 Aug 2026, 14:241,323-4
14 Aug 2026, 07:271,327-1
11 Aug 2026, 06:131,328-4
8 Aug 2026, 04:321,332-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:301,333no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:471,333first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.11%
avg views ÷ 1,319 subscribers
Avg views / post
41.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (21 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total123
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC14 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

《投名状》里,庞青云说:有希望打赢的仗,绝对轮不到我们上,让我们上的,肯定是没有希望打赢的。把没有希望打赢的仗打赢,我们才有机会,但仅仅是个机会。你说很难?但不难根本轮不到你。

6 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC34 viewsread 7 August 2026

鬼会附着在人身上,把人性里面极端的部分放大可以看到大大小小的鬼,鬼是迷惑灵魂的东西。极度虚无后的无底线泛滥、恶狠狠不顾人性的阴谋、极度理性的逻辑推理陷入绝对自由主义和自证“人神”的毁灭,每一种极端后面都衍生着一个鬼。 我曾思考过虚无,先是看到茨威格先生写的把一个人关在一个屋子里面,隔断外界的交往,有人按时送给你吃的,但是没有人和你说话,没有东西给你消遣,只有一张床,一张桌子,一把椅子,还有一些用品,这个人会经历虚无。后来看到西西弗神话里面的无意义劳动,觉得个人所做的东西徒劳无功也会虚无。再后来是强制性群居类似监狱那种,我在想在一大堆人里面没有说的上话的人,别人排斥你,你尽可能融入别人却格格不入,你会开始思想活跃起来投向自身的思考,而人一旦思考过度了也会是无止境的虚无。 而在这里我看到了虚无不是“什么都无所谓”,更可怕的是对“什么都无所谓”都不在乎,然后超越底线去追求存在感快感崩塌于自我世界观的拉扯。 虚无是每个人多多少少都存在的

1 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC75 viewsread 7 August 2026

很久以前我就学会了如何放手管理。你不能让自我成为障碍,成为一个高增长公司的唯一办法就是聘用在各自专业领域里比你更好、更聪明的人,使他们熟悉自己要做的事情,要随时接近他们,以便让他们不断听到你为他们设定的方向,然后,你就可以走开了。

25 Jul 2026, 00:12 UTC77 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

此画应景,醒酒 这幅画是19世纪俄罗斯著名海洋画家伊万·康斯坦丁诺维奇·艾瓦佐夫斯基(Ivan Aivazovsky)的名作: * 画名:《巨浪》(*The Wave* / 俄语:*Волна*) * 作者:伊万·艾瓦佐夫斯基(Ivan Aivazovsky, 1817–1900) * 创作年份:1889年 * 现藏地:俄罗斯圣彼得堡·俄罗斯博物馆(State Russian Museum) ### 画作简析 这幅画是艾瓦佐夫斯基晚年极其重要的代表作之一。画中展现了一艘在狂风巨浪中艰难挣扎的帆船,他运用了标志性的罩染透明法(Glazing),将前景清澈通透的翡翠绿海水与背景沉闷阴冷的大气层、凶猛的巨浪形成强烈对比,完美展现了浪漫主义艺术中对自然伟力(Sublime)的震撼描绘。

23 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC80 viewsread 7 August 2026

让我们尽量相信,每一个有坏处的人都有他值得人同情和原谅的地方。一个人的过错,常常并不只是他一个人所造成的。

23 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC79 viewsread 7 August 2026

能媚我必能害我,宜加意防之;肯规予者必肯助予,宜倾心听之。

23 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC79 viewsread 7 August 2026

知其善而守之,锦上添花;知其恶而弗为,祸转为福!

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TranGPT7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 689,404 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“黑神话不悟空(舍经记)” (@TranGPT7), 1,319 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TranGPT7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.