Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TRADERSPIN

Channel

TRADERSPIN

@Traderspin101

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Cite this entry

55,070subscribers

+5,666 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001356254062
TypeChannel
Username@Traderspin101
Description📊 8 Years of Experience in the Forex Market ✅ ❌ No Account Management ❌ No Copy Trading ❌ No Investment Services ⚠️ Trade Responsibly. Trading Involves Risk.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held49
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Traderspin101

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

49,36155,35552,3586 August 2026 — 49,404 subscribers6 August 2026 — 49,404 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,361 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,424 subscribers9 August 2026 — 49,747 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49,844 subscribers11 August 2026 — 49,908 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,029 subscribers13 August 2026 — 50,113 subscribers14 August 2026 — 50,152 subscribers16 August 2026 — 50,393 subscribers17 August 2026 — 50,504 subscribers18 August 2026 — 50,447 subscribers19 August 2026 — 50,446 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,515 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,488 subscribers23 August 2026 — 50,685 subscribers24 August 2026 — 50,708 subscribers25 August 2026 — 50,706 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,657 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,650 subscribers28 August 2026 — 50,648 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50,861 subscribers30 August 2026 — 51,078 subscribers1 September 2026 — 51,094 subscribers1 September 2026 — 51,074 subscribers3 September 2026 — 51,042 subscribers4 September 2026 — 50,983 subscribers7 September 2026 — 51,398 subscribers10 September 2026 — 51,503 subscribers12 September 2026 — 51,509 subscribers14 September 2026 — 51,699 subscribers16 September 2026 — 51,768 subscribers18 September 2026 — 51,745 subscribers1 October 2026 — 53,853 subscribers6 October 2026 — 54,164 subscribers10 October 2026 — 54,517 subscribers13 October 2026 — 54,893 subscribers15 October 2026 — 54,909 subscribers16 October 2026 — 54,963 subscribers17 October 2026 — 55,030 subscribers18 October 2026 — 55,184 subscribers19 October 2026 — 55,293 subscribers20 October 2026 — 55,319 subscribers21 October 2026 — 55,355 subscribers22 October 2026 — 55,351 subscribers23 October 2026 — 55,244 subscribers24 October 2026 — 55,142 subscribers25 October 2026 — 55,070 subscribers55,0706 August 202625 October 2026
49 measurements spanning 80 days, net +5,666. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,462–56,254 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 14:0455,070-72
24 Oct 2026, 17:1055,142-102
23 Oct 2026, 13:4655,244-107
22 Oct 2026, 16:3155,351-4
21 Oct 2026, 09:4955,355+36
20 Oct 2026, 04:0655,319+26
19 Oct 2026, 07:3655,293+109
18 Oct 2026, 07:0655,184+154
17 Oct 2026, 05:3055,030+67
16 Oct 2026, 02:0154,963+54
15 Oct 2026, 01:5754,909+16
13 Oct 2026, 20:4554,893+376
10 Oct 2026, 08:3954,517+353
6 Oct 2026, 03:1954,164+311
1 Oct 2026, 01:4053,853+2,108
18 Sept 2026, 06:1751,745-23
16 Sept 2026, 00:1851,768+69
14 Sept 2026, 06:1951,699+190
12 Sept 2026, 11:5651,509+6
10 Sept 2026, 06:1951,503first reading

Engagement

347 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.81%
avg views ÷ 55,070 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,750
99 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
99
of 347 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held347 (4 August 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Views total371,440
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Oct 2026, 02:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,500
Videos
≈290
Links
≈2,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 27s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

24 Oct 2026, 05:20 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 26 October 2026

‼️GOOD NEWS‼️ I will be hosting an online seminar this month October on the 30th. In the seminar,I’ll be sharing the trading strategy I personally use for trading and engaging with traders. 🔴TO BE PART OF THE ONLINE SEMINAR, FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW🔴 STEPS TO FOLLOW ➡️IMPORTANT: Exness is not available in India, Afghanistan, Iran, USA, UK, and a few others. 🔵Sign up with my recommended BROKER below https:…

23 Oct 2026, 14:30 UTC652 viewsread 24 October 2026

‼️GOOD NEWS‼️ I will be hosting an online seminar this month October on the 30th. In the seminar,I’ll be sharing the trading strategy I personally use for trading and engaging with traders. 🔴TO BE PART OF THE ONLINE SEMINAR, FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW🔴 STEPS TO FOLLOW ➡️IMPORTANT: Exness is not available in India, Afghanistan, Iran, USA, UK, and a few others. 🔵Sign up with my recommended BROKER below https:…

23 Oct 2026, 08:12 UTC466 viewsread 23 October 2026

‼️GOOD NEWS‼️ I will be hosting an online seminar this month Octotober on the 30th. In the seminar,I’ll be sharing the trading strategy I personally use for trading and engaging with traders. 🔴TO BE PART OF THE ONLINE SEMINAR, FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW🔴 STEPS TO FOLLOW ➡️IMPORTANT: Exness is not available in India, Afghanistan, Iran, USA, UK, and a few others. 🔵Sign up with my recommended BROKER below http…

23 Oct 2026, 07:17 UTC≈2,030 viewsread 26 October 2026

GBPCHF RUNNING 🎯 https://www.tradingview.com/x/CSduEjzQ/

23 Oct 2026, 03:18 UTC≈2,060 viewsread 26 October 2026
Poll

Have you had a profitable week so far this week?

  1. Yes44%
  2. No40%
  3. It’s average20%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Oct 2026, 05:16 UTC≈2,520 viewsread 26 October 2026

NZDCHF SL HIT❌⚠️ https://www.tradingview.com/x/QYhjpvhR/

Showing the 12 most recent of 347 posts we hold for @Traderspin101. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Traderspin101 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 October 2026
Most recent edit
12 October 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 23 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Oct 2026, 03:18 UTCAnonymous Poll117 voters

Have you had a profitable week so far this week?

  1. Yes44%
  2. No40%
  3. It’s average20%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Oct 2026, 12:21 UTCAnonymous Poll288 voters

Are you trading this week?

  1. yes67%
  2. no22%
  3. not sure15%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Oct 2026, 04:59 UTCAnonymous Poll118 voters

how often do you trade per week?

  1. everyday33%
  2. almost everyday19%
  3. not everyday19%
  4. it depends33%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Oct 2026, 05:25 UTCAnonymous Poll296 voters

How’s your trading week going so far?

  1. Good39%
  2. Bad39%
  3. Average22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Oct 2026, 05:37 UTCAnonymous Poll148 voters

will you trade Gold this week?

  1. yes84%
  2. no17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Oct 2026, 05:45 UTCAnonymous Poll349 voters

How has been your trading week?

  1. Good35%
  2. Bad44%
  3. Average21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 347 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 25 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TRADERSPIN” (@Traderspin101), 55,070 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Traderspin101.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.