Channel
Experiment Trader
@Trader_Fx_659
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,362subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001263796944 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Trader_Fx_659 |
| Description | Best Account Management available 💪💯 Without Any Risk 100% profit 👌 Minimum Equity 1000$-2000$ 3000$ 4000$ 5000$ 💵 Profits Sharing 50/50 Any Broker Accepted (MT4/MT5) 👍 💰Payment method Binance usdt nettler Skrill btc Contact me @ExperimentTrader |
| First recorded | 1 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Trader_Fx_659 |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 17:49 | 31,362 | first reading |
Engagement
No public post preview. We read this entry on 1 October 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@MrRoberto_king1 · 15,786#1
@httpsgilityforex1918 · 9,631#2
@goldeaglegorer3 · 9,365#3
@EasyForexPips · 242,954#4
@ameritfxvip5425 · 15,719#5
@Xau_Empire7 · 17,345#6
@Horizon_FxGold · 8,671#7
@goldsnipers11 · 195,022#8
@mViewXuk50 · 5#9
@GoldPrifitgallery · 11,381#10
@octaforex_22 · 11,966#11
@wiserfx9 · 15,917#12
@GOLDBTCUSD1 · 6,693#13
@raza_jaan_1778 · 13,481#14
@fxpipspredators007 · 41,836#15
@GOLDSNNPERS0 · 6,228#16
@GOLDSNNPER1 · 10,582#17
@Masterfxgold22 · 14,766#18
@GoldInfinity193 · 12,598#19
@JesseGoldOfficial · 9,196#20
@Profit_Trader_Xauusd · 5,844#21
@goldtradersunny · 109,106#22
@Fxscorpionzzz · 17,581#23
@Trading_lab_usa · 18,708#24
@ictconceptsignals · 8,037#25
@precisegoldscalping · 4,006#26
@Btcusdtt15 · 10,317#27
@GoldKing_Hub · 6,761#28
@GLOBAL_MARKETINSIGHT72 · 15,549#29
@Pro_Trade_Freu_Fx_927 · 4,339#30
@falconfxsignals · 5,542#31
@Joan_FX_KING_77 · 3,957#32
@wells_crypto · 69,247#33
@goldprotradertame · 43,543#34
@GOLDSNNPER786 · 53,214#35
@Technicalforexteam · 3,083#36
@mmsignalsfx · 104,630#37
@Education_Cycle01 · 7,095#38
@GoldEmpire_1709 · 7,786#39
@TURBOtradersInternationals · 118,443#40
@forexanalysis · 114,462#41
@xauusdgoldsignals777 · 9,650#42
@schooloftrades · 154,454#43
@ForexProSignalsHub · 16,979#44
@bengoldtrader · 354,113#45
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TeamPerfect1489 · 19,493
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Experiment Trader” (@Trader_Fx_659), 31,362 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Trader_Fx_659.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.