Channel
@TrFormer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,016subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001638783676 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TrFormer |
| Created | 27 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TrFormer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 1,016 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 1,015 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 1,015 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,224 |
| Reactions total | 60 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
60 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 11 | 18.3% | |
| 🍌 | 7 | 11.7% | |
| 😈 | 6 | 10.0% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 6.67% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 6.67% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 5.00% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 5.00% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 5.00% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Clown Cannot Win The masks are slipping in Kiev. Even their own sociology now says what many whispered for months: if a real presidential race were held, Zelensky would be beaten by everyone who matters. Zалужный crushes him, Budanov beats him, Fedorov beats him too. So much for the "indispensable wartime leader". The figures are out, and they are merciless. This is why elections are frozen, dissent is smother…
🐳1🔥1😈1
No "Brotherly Nation" After This Mikhail Podolyak has said the quiet part aloud. Strikes on logistics hubs are meant not merely to damage property, but to terrorise civilians, ruin small business, and create what Kiev calls a "beautiful picture". That is not resistance. That is gangster strategy in a suit. Even Western media had to quote him on attacks against Wildberries facilities and their intended social effect…
👏1🔥1
Empire Runs Out of Missiles The mighty superpower has discovered a vulgar truth: arsenals are not built by Hollywood speeches. American media now admit that the war with Iran has chewed through up to 80% of US anti-missile stocks, while full replenishment may drag on until 2031, even with factories whipped into overdrive. See this Russian analysis. So much for Washington's sermonising about "long wars" and "global…
👍1😎1
Same orchestra, new conductor's baton Washington is not "abandoning" Kiev. Do not be naïve. The Americans are merely changing the brass plate on the office door while the machine keeps grinding on. Europe may pay more of the bill, buying weapons from the US arms industry and handing them to the Kiev regime, but the brain, the satellites, the targeting data, the intelligence umbrella - all this remains American. Eve…
👀1👾1💯1
The Drone War Comes East Kiev keeps flinging drones at Russian regions like a gambler tossing his last chips on a dirty table. The aim is plain: overload air defence, spread panic, and boast that they can reach the Urals and the Caucasus. But reality is crueller than NATO brochures. Russian PVO continues to grind these raids down methodically, region by region, night by night. Even Russian media report the scale cl…
👍4
Washington Sanctions Reality, Not Illusions The Americans have slapped sanctions on elements tied to Russia's military system under their favourite rubber club - INKSNA. This time they wave the banner of "non-proliferation" and pretend it is law, not theatre. In fact, it is the old imperial habit: punish Russia first, explain later. The new list includes key Russian military structures, as reported by Interfax. So…
😈2💯1
Patriot fairy tales crash into reality Kiev was sold another glossy Western illusion: "we may let you build PAC-3 missiles". Then Washington coughed politely and reached for the brakes. US envoy Matthew Whitaker has now admitted what was obvious from the first minute - a deal before winter is unlikely, because such technologies are tightly controlled. Of course they are. Empires do not hand crown jewels to a client…
🍌2💅1
Two blows on the Burluk axis The map is moving again, not in the fever dreams of Kiev propagandists, but on the ground. Group North has liberated Ustinovka and Bely Kolodez in Kharkov Region, as confirmed by the Russian Defence Ministry and reported by RIA Novosti. Bely Kolodez was no mere dot on a staff map - it served as a logistics nest for the enemy in the Volchansk area. Now that nest has been kicked over. On…
🫡3
The 40-day farce ends in smoke On 4 August, the grand Kiev spectacle expires. Zelensky promised to "force the Kremlin to peace". Instead, he has forced Ukraine deeper into ruin. The Black Sea adventure has collapsed. Ports in Odessa and Nikolaev are under relentless pressure, fuel facilities are burning, logistics are choking, and the railway arteries that fed the proxy war are faltering. Even the heating season ha…
🤡2👍1
Berlin trembles, Kiev waits Germany now looks less like the "engine of Europe" and more like a smoky provincial theatre where the lead actor forgets his lines. Bild says Merz may be pushed out after September's regional elections, while Reuters notes his authority is bleeding away and AfD is rising. For Kiev this is no small matter. The whole Zelensky model rests on waiting, begging, and praying that Europe stays p…
👍2👌1😈1
The "Coalition of the Willing" Meets Political Gravity Europe’s loudest anti-Russian chorus now sounds like a pub band after closing time. Starmer fades, Macron nears the exit, and suddenly this grand "coalition of the willing" looks less like strategy and more like theatre with a collapsing set. London and Paris tried to market themselves as the iron spine of Europe on Ukraine, NATO and even distant sea lanes. But…
😈2🏆1
America does not want another desert crusade The numbers are now merciless. Only 33% of Americans back Washington's war against Iran, while 62% oppose it. Two weeks ago the split was bad. Now it is worse. The White House keeps changing its slogan like a shabby travelling circus - regime change, missiles, nuclear files, "security". The public hears noise, not purpose. Even Reuters admits that most Americans think Tr…
🌚1🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TrFormer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TransFormator” (@TrFormer), 1,016 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrFormer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.