Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
小林家的托尔
@TooruchanNews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
6,804subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001146723984 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TooruchanNews |
| Created | 24 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TooruchanNews |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 6,804 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:59 | 6,805 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:21 | 6,809 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 6,813 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 6,814 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.5%
- avg views ÷ 6,804 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,810
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (14 January 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,415 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
已正义404
https://github.com/RainPPR/china-llms-anecdote-0721
Photo, posted without a caption
#不吐不快 GHG 重出江湖
@瑞泽老姜 @风越数码
在现今的内存/闪存大涨价趋势下,假如你的手机/平板电脑等移动设备损坏了,你会选择?
- 换一个存储规格同款或者更好的22%
- 以同样的价格换降配 SoC 等但同等存储规格的型号5%
- 换一个降配存储规格但是价格差不多的型号5%
- 不换了,修修也不是不能用68%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
现代的视频网站不需要贴片广告,因为甲方会用推荐算法和投放硬广来恶心所有免费和付费用户。 记得前几天看到一位 Vup 吐槽过他那奇葩的甲方,有的甲方只需要 UP 自行准备文案然后给甲方审核就行,其中也不乏某些甲方为了照顾视频观看体验,会让 UP 把广告贴到视频最后(有一种早年战渣浪时代依靠视频后段黑屏来躲避二次压制的感觉)。但是两大二手平台(知道的应该都懂我说的是谁),不仅要求固定文案,固定发音(用的 AI 念稿),甚至还来者不拒(我就不信你们没有见过搬油管/TikTok 加个 AI 翻译的二手号中间插过这种硬广)。 如果说传统贴片硬广视频网站(271 之流)没落的话,那纵容这种贴片硬广传播的甲方和内容提供方就应该步他们的后尘。
Photo, posted without a caption
厚古薄今收收味
酷态科:🤡
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TooruchanNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
在现今的内存/闪存大涨价趋势下,假如你的手机/平板电脑等移动设备损坏了,你会选择?
- 换一个存储规格同款或者更好的22%
- 以同样的价格换降配 SoC 等但同等存储规格的型号5%
- 换一个降配存储规格但是价格差不多的型号5%
- 不换了,修修也不是不能用68%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 316,483 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小林家的托尔” (@TooruchanNews), 6,804 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TooruchanNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.