🔗 Chat • X • TonTrader
🤝3🔥2👍1

Channel
@TonTraderCrypto
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
39,206subscribers
-1,036 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002158230015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TonTraderCrypto |
| Description | Your reliable guide to crypto trading. Gamified learning, safe practice, and live trading! App: @TonTraderCryptoBot Partnership: https://affiliate.tontrader.com/register Community: @tontrader_chat_eng @Moderator_TonTrader |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 52 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TonTraderCrypto |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 39,206 | -22 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 39,228 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 39,235 | -12 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 39,247 | -31 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 39,278 | -13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:29 | 39,291 | -28 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:54 | 39,319 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:37 | 39,327 | +2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:07 | 39,325 | -27 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:57 | 39,352 | -15 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:48 | 39,367 | -26 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:07 | 39,393 | -34 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 02:55 | 39,427 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 39,433 | -30 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:29 | 39,463 | -94 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 39,557 | -109 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 16:42 | 39,666 | -96 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 39,762 | -157 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 39,919 | -163 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 40,082 | first reading |
287 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 97 of 98 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 287 (31 July 2026 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 27,922 |
| Reactions total | 683 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Oct 2026, 21:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,178 reactions across 281 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 612 | 28.1% | |
| 🤝 | 573 | 26.3% | |
| ❤ | 417 | 19.1% | |
| 🔥 | 408 | 18.7% | |
| 😱 | 72 | 3.31% | |
| 💯 | 47 | 2.16% | |
| 👌 | 30 | 1.38% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 0.275% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.275% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.184% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.138% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 281 of the 287 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 287 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TonTraderCrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 287 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 30 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔗 Chat • X • TonTrader
🤝3🔥2👍1
💳 Mastercard beats earnings expectations $9.8 billion in revenue, up 14% year over year. The company outperformed forecasts again in Q3, while card spending volume increased by 9%. ⏺ It’s not just payments driving growth. Mastercard’s value-added services including fraud protection, analytics and consulting grew by 19%, generating $4 billion in revenue. ⏺ Looking ahead, the company is exploring AI-powere…
🔥2👍1🤝1
💰 Binance reportedly lost control of wallets holding $6.3 billion This could become the largest crypto hack in history. On October 29, billions of dollars in ETH, USDT, USDC and other tokens reportedly began leaving Binance hot wallets. One of the largest transactions was worth around $2.5 billion. How did it happen? ⏺According to Binance’s preliminary explanation, attackers gained access to a DevOps engineer…
🔥2❤1👍1
🎬 AI spent two years making a movie. A mother and son made one for $200 and grossed $10M On October 23, China saw the release of a feature film made entirely with AI. It reportedly cost $1.5M, involved around 100 people, and took more than two years to produce. The result? Just $181K at the box office. Meanwhile, the animated film Nu Lai, created at home by a mother and her son for just $200, became a meme thanks …
👍6🔥2🤩2
🗳 AI made up elections and candidates In roughly one out of five cases, AI chatbots gave voters incorrect recommendations. The Washington Post tested six popular AI tools by asking them to create election guides based on specific US addresses. ⏺ ChatGPT told a Missouri resident about a Senate election that wasn’t happening in the state that year. Other bots included candidates who weren’t even on the ballot. …
👍3❤1🔥1
🏦 Canada hikes rates, while the Fed holds steady 🇨🇦 Canada: 2.25% → 2.5%. 🇺🇸 US: no change, but two Fed officials backed a hike. The Bank of Canada is tightening policy as inflation runs hotter than expected. The Fed is holding steady, despite divisions within the committee. 📊 What does it mean? Cheap money isn’t coming back just yet. New inflation data could influence the dollar and crypto markets. 📈 Stay on top …
🤝3❤1🔥1
🔒 Datavault AI can’t access its Bitcoin and shares plunge nearly 50% The company reported holding BTC. Now it says it couldn’t withdraw the coins. Datavault AI disclosed in a regulatory filing that it had been unable to withdraw Bitcoin from the Singapore-based Biconomy platform since requesting a transfer in June. 💬 The company initially received around 1,309 BTC as part of a $150 million deal with Scilex. It…
👌4👍1💯1
🖼 “AI promised less work. I’ve never worked more.” AI agents were supposed to save time. Instead, they created more work to manage. Orestis Ioannou, a technology executive, shared an essay that quickly gained traction on Hacker News. His argument: AI agents made tasks so much cheaper to tackle that he started taking on far more of them. ⏺ Multiple agents can now code, debug servers, review changes and research…
🤝3❤1🔥1
💳 Visa beats earnings estimates, but shares slip Strong results weren’t enough to impress the market. Visa reported its fiscal Q4 2026 results, with revenue up 13% year over year to $12.1 billion. Adjusted earnings reached $3.48 per share, beating analysts’ $3.44 estimate. 💬 Despite the beat, Visa shares fell in after-hours trading as investors weighed payment-volume growth and the company’s outlook for the ne…
😱3🔥1🤝1
🤑 Samsung takes a jab at the foldable iPhone Apple took years to enter the foldable market. Samsung was ready with a joke. Samsung has released an Instagram ad poking fun at Apple’s new iPhone Duo without even mentioning Apple by name. ⏺ The timing couldn’t be better. Some iPhone Duo owners have reported cracks in the inner display near the hinge. Apple has acknowledged reports affecting a small number of devi…
🔥4💯1🤯1
😺 ChatGPT Found a Replacement for Instagram Support: Journalists Locked out of your account? ChatGPT might suggest contacting the press. That’s what happened to 404 Media, whose inbox was flooded with messages from users directed there by AI. 🟡 The AI doesn’t just give advice it writes the email. In one case, ChatGPT advised a user who had lost access to Instagram to contact journalist Jason Koebler. It even d…
😱5❤3🔥1
🥇 Forget Gold: AI Server Cargo Is Becoming a Target for Thieves Since early June, more than $110 million worth of data-center equipment has reportedly been stolen in the US. Criminals are targeting servers, memory, cooling systems and networking hardware essential to the AI boom. ⏺ One heist can be worth millions. Individual stolen shipments reportedly reached $38 million in value. Server equipment has become …
🤝3💯1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 287 posts we hold for @TonTraderCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Smartphones are getting more expensive, memory is being used for AI, and upgrading your phone is becoming more costly every year. 👀
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How do you like the new version?
The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
If you had to pick a new smartphone right now, what are you going for? ⬇️
The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👀 So, who’s already put the signals to the test❔
The shares total 340%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤑 Half a month until fall. Your main summer highlight❔
The shares total 211%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤑 What does your perfect summer day look like❔
The shares total 203%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 287 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 30 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TonTrader: Investing in Crypto Wisely” (@TonTraderCrypto), 39,206 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TonTraderCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.